|
Post by socrates on Sept 9, 2017 23:18:27 GMT
dive for me but don't they all,I've slow moed it 5 times and both feet are in the air before he gets to slovombe Yeah I haven't slowed it down but their mans dived right in to it both feet in line with each other arms out like superman taking off, if you get caught in a full sprint you don't go down like that you go down awkwardly and roll. He's done the ref but he was a crap ref so not surprised but at least the cheats didn't prosper. UTG
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 9, 2017 23:22:25 GMT
Having seen that, a definate trip by Slocombe. Have to say at the time thought it was a clear dive. Ref got that right, but he and his linesmen hardly covered there selves with glory with a number of poor decisions. It was a clear dive . There's no way he would have gone down like that if he'd been running properly and got caught by our keeper , he thrown both feet out and his arms in a perfect dive . I'm not saying that because it was their player if I saw one of ours do that I'd be appalled at that kind of behaviour, but as I've said cheats didn't prosper so all good . UTG
|
|
|
Post by 68 on Sept 10, 2017 8:04:32 GMT
dive for me but don't they all,I've slow moed it 5 times and both feet are in the air before he gets to slovombe Totally agree. Their guy is in the air well before Slocombe is near him. Bakayoko looks quite stupid in the "freeze frames" I have. Ref was terrible from the first foul on Gaffney which he didn't give.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2017 8:31:09 GMT
I don't agree mate , pause it immediately before alleged contact and his feet are both clearly off the floor showing his attempt to dive its plain to see
|
|
|
Post by 68 on Sept 10, 2017 8:57:20 GMT
I don't agree mate , pause it immediately before alleged contact and his feet are both clearly off the floor showing his attempt to dive its plain to see I'm not sure why some think the ref had a good view; he's still in the centre circle, in our half of the field. He only saw the rear view. He had the worse view of all. Can't see properly, at the exact point of the incident, but the lino seems way behind. No way could either have seen the incident properly to send a player off.
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Sept 10, 2017 8:58:22 GMT
I don't think it's worth appealing the sending off. Even if the bloke did dive, and I can't fine control my iPad enough to watch frame by frame, I just know they'll back the ref because they always do.
I suppose it would only be worth appealing if it meant we could get a stay of execution fot Tuesdays game and give DC time to sort out a loan for next Saturday.
Although I'm not sure we'd be allowed to that as we do have Andre junior.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2017 9:13:33 GMT
I don't think it's worth appealing the sending off. Even if the bloke did dive, and I can't fine control my iPad enough to watch frame by frame, I just know they'll back the ref because they always do. I suppose it would only be worth appealing if it meant we could get a stay of execution fot Tuesdays game and give DC time to sort out a loan for next Saturday. Although I'm not sure we'd be allowed to that as we do have Andre junior. I have freeze framed it screen shotted it and it shows him diving when you zoom in but it would've been tricky for the ref to decipher, how do you upload photos?
|
|
|
Post by popuppirate on Sept 10, 2017 9:57:48 GMT
Not sure we'll win an appeal, I've not seen it frame by frame yet but if the striker is first to the ball and Slocombe makes no contact with it I think it will be classed as a foul, contact or no contact.
|
|
|
Post by 68 on Sept 10, 2017 10:16:39 GMT
Not sure we'll win an appeal, I've not seen it frame by frame yet but if the striker is first to the ball and Slocombe makes no contact with it I think it will be classed as a foul, contact or no contact. That may be but does it result in a sending off if their player dived, which he clearly did? Ref was conned.
|
|
|
Post by popuppirate on Sept 10, 2017 10:20:42 GMT
Not sure we'll win an appeal, I've not seen it frame by frame yet but if the striker is first to the ball and Slocombe makes no contact with it I think it will be classed as a foul, contact or no contact. That may be but does it result in a sending off if their player dived, which he clearly did? Ref was conned. Doubt it, the striker would claim that he touched the ball past the keeper, who went to ground, and that he was avoiding being taken out by a mistimed tackle.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Sept 10, 2017 11:15:42 GMT
That may be but does it result in a sending off if their player dived, which he clearly did? Ref was conned. Doubt it, the striker would claim that he touched the ball past the keeper, who went to ground, and that he was avoiding being taken out by a mistimed tackle. My only thoughts are - what a dire back pass from Leadbitter - he is prone to these mis-hit passes - it could hold his career back despite his good qualities.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 10, 2017 11:18:51 GMT
Doubt it, the striker would claim that he touched the ball past the keeper, who went to ground, and that he was avoiding being taken out by a mistimed tackle. My only thoughts are - what a dire back pass from Leadbitter - he is prone to these mis-hit passes - it could hold his career back despite his good qualities. He's got a hell of a lot of work to do to become a good all round player that's for sure. His pace is Premier league but his positioning passing crossing etc can look very non league at times.
|
|
|
Post by Gashead51 on Sept 10, 2017 12:58:29 GMT
That may be but does it result in a sending off if their player dived, which he clearly did? Ref was conned. Doubt it, the striker would claim that he touched the ball past the keeper, who went to ground, and that he was avoiding being taken out by a mistimed tackle.
|
|