Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2017 14:24:44 GMT
I see the new panel have charged the first player of simulation where the referee did not see it as simulation and awarded a penalty to Carlisle. Admittedly they only look at incidents that involve a penalty or dismissal but it is a start
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Oct 19, 2017 14:46:59 GMT
Bit of a weird one. He didn't appeal for anything, and then tried to play the ball.
Nothing like, eg, Richarlison's ridiculous dive against Arsenal.
Not surprised they should try to enforce it on a lower league player, though.
|
|
|
Post by toddy1953 on Oct 19, 2017 15:03:02 GMT
Agree it's a start, probably reasonably harsh by the looks of that one, but worse case for him is a 2 game ban. Unless they start overturning the event ie No Pen, therefore in this case a 3-2 defeat or start banning for 10/12 games then things won't change. Need to ensure that the cheats don't prosper & that includes the club they play for, even if it's us.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Oct 19, 2017 15:11:13 GMT
Looked like a clear dive.
Nice long ban needed.
|
|
|
Post by Strange Gas on Oct 19, 2017 17:28:37 GMT
Agree. Didn’t realise the beast was still playing!
|
|
|
Post by Blueside on Oct 19, 2017 18:31:52 GMT
Agree it's a start, probably reasonably harsh by the looks of that one, but worse case for him is a 2 game ban. Unless they start overturning the event ie No Pen, therefore in this case a 3-2 defeat or start banning for 10/12 games then things won't change. Need to ensure that the cheats don't prosper & that includes the club they play for, even if it's us. Exactly! So a robber robs a bank for a million, gets caught, does 5 years but is allowed to keep the money? Seems odd to me 🤔
|
|