|
Post by Baxtinho on Nov 20, 2017 14:28:56 GMT
I couldn't get a Sweet Potato Pie as they were sold out again at 2:50. Not sure if this is major enough, but I was sad.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 20, 2017 14:34:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2017 14:37:47 GMT
Even the SC are playing ITK God. Why dont they just say what it is? Everyone wants to have a secret nowadays. What a farce our club has become, was there any need to sh!t stir even more, now we'll have 50+ pages trying to guess what the hell Jim's talking about!!
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Nov 20, 2017 14:41:32 GMT
I can't take anymore of these subliminal rumours!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 16:28:03 GMT
ok so the board has halved in size so its suggested 2 sc directors are a bit over the top for 8% holding.
compromise...sc keeps 2 directors but agree only one will attend meetings at any given time (rotate). However the legally binding option of two should be kept...as at a future time more investors might come along and the board could return to 8 or 10 people.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Nov 20, 2017 16:34:09 GMT
ok so the board has halved in size so its suggested 2 sc directors are a bit over the top for 8% holding. compromise...sc keeps 2 directors but agree only one will attend meetings at any given time (rotate). However the legally binding option of two should be kept...as at a future time more investors might come along and the board could return to 8 or 10 people. Isn't it to be more about the share scheme / SC shares becoming a value where they can no longer have a representative? I'm no expert on such issues but if the shareholding is worth a place on the board then surely the changing of board members shouldn't worry the SC? As I say, this isn't my territory....
|
|
|
Post by dinsdale on Nov 20, 2017 17:09:58 GMT
If they also ban Ken Masters il start paying into the share scheme again. Banning the SC directors is the best thing they have done so far.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2017 17:16:49 GMT
If they also ban Ken Masters il start paying into the share scheme again. Banning the SC directors is the best thing they have done so far. Ban the SC's? What so supporters have zero input into any BoD decisions, aren't things seemingly bad enough already?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Nov 20, 2017 17:17:44 GMT
If they also ban Ken Masters il start paying into the share scheme again. Banning the SC directors is the best thing they have done so far. Ban the SC's? What so supporters have zero input into any BoD decisions, aren't things seemingly bad enough already? What input has KM had? Ever?
|
|
|
Post by dinsdale on Nov 20, 2017 17:30:56 GMT
If they also ban Ken Masters il start paying into the share scheme again. Banning the SC directors is the best thing they have done so far. Ban the SC's? What so supporters have zero input into any BoD decisions, aren't things seemingly bad enough already? The supporters club are interested in themselves and nothing more. Ken does f**k all and they never looked out for our interests both when we almost dissapered and when Mike Turl offered a decent blueprint for a sustainable club. They are so stuck in the past they are of zero relevance
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2017 18:09:21 GMT
Ban the SC's? What so supporters have zero input into any BoD decisions, aren't things seemingly bad enough already? What input has KM had? Ever? That's the SC's members fault for reelecting him, I assume they must think he does something useful, I though BSS did a good job - perhaps that's why he's decided not to stand for reelection.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 20, 2017 19:49:16 GMT
Surely this 'major issue' has been discussed in the corridor of power . Anyone been earwigging and care to divulge ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 19:50:41 GMT
They are adding an additional number to the 50/50tickets following selling the rights to a Canadian pension fund.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Nov 20, 2017 19:56:09 GMT
They are adding an additional number to the 50/50tickets following selling the rights to a Canadian pension fund. But bideford isn't in Canada!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 20:09:41 GMT
They are adding an additional number to the 50/50tickets following selling the rights to a Canadian pension fund. But bideford isn't in Canada! Yet another who buries their head in the sand and ignores the truth. Bideford, Prince Edward Island C0B 1J0, Canada
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2017 0:19:35 GMT
How can the supporters club not tell us about the major issue? ?? Were the friggin supporters arnt we?
|
|
|
Post by RD on Nov 21, 2017 13:15:58 GMT
SC are f**king dead to me after that remark.
What a pathetic and childish remark to make. Pretty much amounts to "some sh*t has gone down, we know about it, but you peasants will have to wait".
Hang on a minute....
...has anyone ever seen gansincider and the SC in the same room?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Nov 21, 2017 13:23:08 GMT
SC are f**king dead to me after that remark. What a pathetic and childish remark to make. Pretty much amounts to "some sh*t has gone down, we know about it, but you peasants will have to wait". Hang on a minute.... ...has anyone ever seen gansincider and the SC in the same room? This club is seriously f**ked. So many petty people protecting little empires.
|
|
|
Post by jungleboogie on Nov 21, 2017 13:41:22 GMT
SC are f**king dead to me after that remark. What a pathetic and childish remark to make. Pretty much amounts to "some sh*t has gone down, we know about it, but you peasants will have to wait". Hang on a minute.... ...has anyone ever seen gansincider and the SC in the same room? This club is seriously f**ked. So many petty people protecting little empires. That's just it, they're only little empires, so let them have their 5 mins, and hopefully, sooner rather than later they all bog off, never to be seen again, and take their moaning of open top buses, and crap books with them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2017 16:55:11 GMT
So the major issue is on top of the negotiations with the FC president about the number of directors the sc has on the board. Blimey...wonder what it can be...the loss of a director is pretty major I would have thought.
|
|