|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 9:33:48 GMT
Also, I thought this was already turned down once? Has this been re submitted due to the legal action we have brought against Sainsburys?
|
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 9:44:00 GMT
The objection at the top states that they would prefer a library and park on the site. Fine. For £28m it's all yours. I swear to God some of these people are living on a different planet.
|
|
|
|
Post by ganymede on Sept 25, 2014 9:58:19 GMT
Also, I thought this was already turned down once? Has this been re submitted due to the legal action we have brought against Sainsburys? Yes. This is the appeal being made by Sainsbury brought about by the writ issued by the club. If this one passes then it looks as if Sainsbury have no wiggle room [says he who is not party to any privileged information.] |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 11:31:12 GMT
Also, I thought this was already turned down once? Has this been re submitted due to the legal action we have brought against Sainsburys? Yes. This is the appeal being made by Sainsbury brought about by the writ issued by the club. If this one passes then it looks as if Sainsbury have no wiggle room [says he who is not party to any privileged information.] Sainsburys have said they waived two other such store onerous conditions. You can bet your last penny they will use everything they have if this smokescreen application goes through |
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 11:38:07 GMT
Yes. This is the appeal being made by Sainsbury brought about by the writ issued by the club. If this one passes then it looks as if Sainsbury have no wiggle room [says he who is not party to any privileged information.] Sainsburys have said they waived two other such store onerous conditions. You can bet your last penny they will use everything they have if this smokescreen application goes through That's my worry and what I feel from my uneducated guess will be the biggest hurdle. The 2 other onerous conditions. They have a plan b and c ready to go right there. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 11:40:11 GMT
Sainsburys have said they waived two other such store onerous conditions. You can bet your last penny they will use everything they have if this smokescreen application goes through That's my worry and what I feel from my uneducated guess will be the biggest hurdle. The 2 other onerous conditions. They have a plan b and c ready to go right there. Precisely that. I believe this is now a battle for compensation but I'd love to be wrong |
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 11:43:16 GMT
That's my worry and what I feel from my uneducated guess will be the biggest hurdle. The 2 other onerous conditions. They have a plan b and c ready to go right there. Precisely that. I believe this is now a battle for compensation but I'd love to be wrong Again, another worry is that we wouldn't get any compo as the clause in the contract says they can pull out if there are any store onerous conditions that are not met. Out of interest, does anyone know what the other 2 conditions are! |
|
|
|
Post by ganymede on Sept 25, 2014 12:07:35 GMT
Precisely that. I believe this is now a battle for compensation but I'd love to be wrong Again, another worry is that we wouldn't get any compo as the clause in the contract says they can pull out if there are any store onerous conditions that are not met. Out of interest, does anyone know what the other 2 conditions are! Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. |
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 12:14:46 GMT
Again, another worry is that we wouldn't get any compo as the clause in the contract says they can pull out if there are any store onerous conditions that are not met. Out of interest, does anyone know what the other 2 conditions are! Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. Does that mean they can not be used as leverage to pull out. If so surely a massive cock up by them as regardless of delivery times they could have used these 2 issues to pull out? |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 12:20:13 GMT
Well if they've waived them and it's all in writing then I don't see how they could get out of it without paying a large sum of money.
|
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 12:38:37 GMT
Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. Does that mean they can not be used as leverage to pull out. If so surely a massive gentlemans appendage up by them as regardless of delivery times they could have used these 2 issues to pull out? Strange that my post is changed? The British expression 'cock-up' isn't commonly used in the USA, where it is generally assumed to have a vulgar meaning. What they might make of Robert Burns' poem, which took the name of the old Scottish rhyme 'Cock up your beaver', is best left to the imagination. What Burns was actually referring to was adorning a beaver fur hat by putting a cock's feather into it. 'Cock', in the sense of this term, means 'stand up conspicuously', 'turn up at the edge', 'bend at an angle' etc. This is the sense of the early usage of the term 'cock-up', in the terms 'cock-up one's ears', 'cock-up one's nose'. In the 17th and 18th centuries people were also often advised to 'cock-up' their bonnets, eyes, even legs. The expression 'cock a snook' also derives from that same sense of 'cock'. Definition of cock-up in English: cock-up Line breaks: cock-up NOUN British informal Something done badly or inefficiently: we’ve made a total cock-up of it |
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 12:39:35 GMT
The soldier needed to gentlemans appendage his rifle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 13:21:57 GMT
Every morning I am awoken by a cock. It hurts my ears.
|
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 14:07:05 GMT
I ate a cock once, once past the toughness it was quite juicy. Tasted just like chicken
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 14:26:54 GMT
I'm glad to see the swear filter is being put to good use.
I feel quite cock-o-hoop about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 15:33:04 GMT
sh** f**k cock.
|
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 15:34:00 GMT
poo flip gentlemans appendage.  Much better than a telling off from the mods. Plus if you're in a water it cheers you up when you read your post again. |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Sept 25, 2014 15:34:39 GMT
poo flip gentlemans appendage. Much better than a telling off from the mods. Plus if you're in a Widdle it cheers you up when you read your post again. Widdle? Goodness me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 16:04:35 GMT
Much better than a telling off from the mods. Plus if you're in a Widdle it cheers you up when you read your post again. Widdle? Goodness me. Trololol |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Sept 25, 2014 16:19:21 GMT
Also, I thought this was already turned down once? Has this been re submitted due to the legal action we have brought against Sainsburys? Yes. This is the appeal being made by Sainsbury brought about by the writ issued by the club. If this one passes then it looks as if Sainsbury have no wiggle room [says he who is not party to any privileged information.] It also appears to be an appeal where we have submitted noise evidence in German with no accredited translation |
|
