Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 16:28:39 GMT
My father in law has an angry little cock that keeps pecking the neighbour.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 17:07:59 GMT
The wife knocks up a tasty cock-a-leekie soup, using a secret ingredient.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 17:09:39 GMT
The wife knocks up a tasty gentlemans appendage-a-leekie soup, using a secret ingredient. I prefer her cock au vin myself.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 17:12:31 GMT
The wife knocks up a tasty gentlemans appendage-a-leekie soup, using a secret ingredient. I prefer her gentlemans appendage au vin myself. Your a wrong un!
|
|
|
Post by inee on Sept 25, 2014 17:16:14 GMT
Much better than a telling off from the mods. Plus if you're in a Widdle it cheers you up when you read your post again. Widdle? Goodness me. ah a word from the song spasticus artisticus (probably spelt wrong)
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 25, 2014 17:37:04 GMT
I prefer her gentlemans appendage au vin myself. Your a wrong un! You'd need a lot of wine to take her cock!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 17:42:20 GMT
My father in law has an angry little gentlemans appendage that keeps pecking the neighbour. peckering?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 17:42:54 GMT
The wife knocks up a tasty gentlemans appendage-a-leekie soup, using a secret ingredient. what's the secret ingredient?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 17:43:34 GMT
ah a word from the song spasticus artisticus (probably spelt wrong) riddlin diddlin widdlin spasticus
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 18:03:51 GMT
Well if this thread is meant to shut up all the doubters, then good luck with that. We have just sued our "partners" for failing to progress an appeal which could allow the sale of the Mem to go ahead. This may be a half baked rubbish conspriracy theory, but I would suggest that litigation against a partner for failing to support a joint project does not bode well for that project. It might however be a warning shot across the bows to our "partners" that we are willing to sue them in full if/when they withdraw. I might dare to be so bold as to suggest it is as clear as a monkey's arse that the UWE is now dead in the water and all that remains is how much compo we can get to salvage the situation. I don't blame NH for this situation. Our "partners" have changed their minds about the purchase and are using get-out clauses to extricate themselves. I'm not wishing it to fail, feeding a frenzy or wanting the club to go down the drain. Just commenting on it as it clearly seems to be. Does anyone really think it will still happen? I've got no problem with the doubters I certainly have my own doubts I just get fed up with all the speculation. I won't believe we will get a stadium until i'm sat in it. On the other hand I am not going to write it off until it is announced officially. I actually think a stadium will be built on that site all the work is done and it has got to be too good an opportunity to miss.
|
|
|
Post by ganymede on Sept 25, 2014 19:01:21 GMT
Already added a Support comment - reminded BCC of the impact on the local economy, new jobs to take people off benefits, massive business rates and the spreading out of deliveries away from peak traffic hours. Mind you, if I lived in Filton Avenue, I suspect I'd be an objector! So far there are 76 objectors and 58 supporters. Supporting/objecting might not influence anything ... but supporting cannot do any harm. If you are inclined to support then now is the time ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 19:16:42 GMT
cock dick penis prick manhood
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 19:38:50 GMT
gentlemans appendage dick penis prick manhood Thanks for clearing that up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 19:58:24 GMT
gentlemans appendage dick penis prick manhood Thanks for clearing that up. any time sir
|
|
|
Post by ganymede on Sept 25, 2014 20:31:53 GMT
Again, another worry is that we wouldn't get any compo as the clause in the contract says they can pull out if there are any store onerous conditions that are not met. Out of interest, does anyone know what the other 2 conditions are! Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. Lulworth … reading the writ it would seem the other two onerous conditions were … 1) Imposing conditions on noise levels emanating from the Store Development and/or the Property with which it would be impossible to comply or which could only be complied with at an additional cost in excess of £40,000 2) Restricting customer and/or vehicular service and/or pedestrian access to and egress from the Property to and from the highway known as Filton Road. Later in the writ it states “The Defendant waived two of those conditions” and the remaining condition was stated to be the access times. All of this is in the public domain and I do not have any legal training and I don’t have any inside info.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Sept 27, 2014 11:54:04 GMT
Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. Lulworth … reading the writ it would seem the other two onerous conditions were … 1) Imposing conditions on noise levels emanating from the Store Development and/or the Property with which it would be impossible to comply or which could only be complied with at an additional cost in excess of £40,000 2) Restricting customer and/or vehicular service and/or pedestrian access to and egress from the Property to and from the highway known as Filton Road. Later in the writ it states “The Defendant waived two of those conditions” and the remaining condition was stated to be the access times. All of this is in the public domain and I do not have any legal training and I don’t have any inside info. Cheers mate.
|
|
|
Post by malmersgas on Sept 27, 2014 12:20:32 GMT
Lulworth … reading the writ it would seem the other two onerous conditions were … 1) Imposing conditions on noise levels emanating from the Store Development and/or the Property with which it would be impossible to comply or which could only be complied with at an additional cost in excess of £40,000 2) Restricting customer and/or vehicular service and/or pedestrian access to and egress from the Property to and from the highway known as Filton Road. Later in the writ it states “The Defendant waived two of those conditions” and the remaining condition was stated to be the access times. All of this is in the public domain and I do not have any legal training and I don’t have any inside info. Cheers mate. But in simple English what does this actually mean?!
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 27, 2014 13:16:23 GMT
Lulworth ... I can look up the other two conditions when I get home from work ... but I believe Sainsbury have already waived the other two conditions. Lulworth … reading the writ it would seem the other two onerous conditions were … 1) Imposing conditions on noise levels emanating from the Store Development and/or the Property with which it would be impossible to comply or which could only be complied with at an additional cost in excess of £40,000 2) Restricting customer and/or vehicular service and/or pedestrian access to and egress from the Property to and from the highway known as Filton Road. Later in the writ it states “The Defendant waived two of those conditions” and the remaining condition was stated to be the access times. All of this is in the public domain and I do not have any legal training and I don’t have any inside info. Haven't Rovers already offered to pay anything over the £40K already? It's seems amazing to me that on a development costing Sainsbury's, what £50/60m in total, they'd pull out over any work costing over £40K to implement, somebody should have a smelt a rat with that condition!!
|
|