|
Post by jaggas on Jan 21, 2019 19:27:12 GMT
Openly in favour of a second referendum: 71 Labour MPs 35 SNP MPs 11 Lib Dem MPs 9 Tory MPs 4 Plaid MPs 1 Green MP = 131 MPs = 20% of all MPs
Second referendum is as dead as Mays awful deal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 19:30:25 GMT
Openly in favour of a second referendum: 71 Labour MPs 35 SNP MPs 11 Lib Dem MPs 9 Tory MPs 4 Plaid MPs 1 Green MP = 131 MPs = 20% of all MPs Second referendum is as dead as Mays awful deal. Source?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 19:36:59 GMT
Talking of quick links, the anti Brexit group putting posters up detailing leading Brexiteers previous comments, has raised £60k in crowd funding. Here is there latest expose of Johnson. flip.it/dty950Christ Oldie. The very first image, Jaguar. As we all know they started the planning to move production to Slovenia in 2015, before the referendum. Their main problem is having a product that relies on Diesel engines of 90%. Their business model is flawed. Nothing to do with Brexit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 19:48:16 GMT
Talking of quick links, the anti Brexit group putting posters up detailing leading Brexiteers previous comments, has raised £60k in crowd funding. Here is there latest expose of Johnson. flip.it/dty950Christ Oldie. The very first image, Jaguar. As we all know they started the planning to move production to Slovenia in 2015, before the referendum. Their main problem is having a product that relies on Diesel engines of 90%. Their business model is flawed. Nothing to do with Brexit. I wasn't claiming any of that. The focus is on Johnson's comment. The location of the poster is a stretch I agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 19:48:51 GMT
Openly in favour of a second referendum: 71 Labour MPs 35 SNP MPs 11 Lib Dem MPs 9 Tory MPs 4 Plaid MPs 1 Green MP = 131 MPs = 20% of all MPs Second referendum is as dead as Mays awful deal. Source? Source?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 20:03:43 GMT
Excellent sequence of logic here
Check out @rolandmcs’s Tweet:
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jan 21, 2019 20:47:52 GMT
Openly in favour of a second referendum: 71 Labour MPs 35 SNP MPs 11 Lib Dem MPs 9 Tory MPs 4 Plaid MPs 1 Green MP = 131 MPs = 20% of all MPs Second referendum is as dead as Mays awful deal. Source? The Guardian, The Mirror, businessinsider plenty out there quoting the same stats.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 20:50:17 GMT
The Guardian, The Mirror, businessinsider plenty out there quoting the same stats. Link?
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jan 21, 2019 21:13:47 GMT
Go find it yourself I am not your personal search engine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 21:17:42 GMT
Go find it yourself I am not your personal search engine. Ah right. I guess there isn't one then. And I get accused...you have to laugh.
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Jan 21, 2019 21:30:07 GMT
71 Labour MPs is available from lots of sources the lib dems makes sense as Cable and co would adopt the Euro tomorrow if they could....You doubting 9 Tories?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 21:54:38 GMT
71 Labour MPs is available from lots of sources the lib dems makes sense as Cable and co would adopt the Euro tomorrow if they could....You doubting 9 Tories? So it's just your opinion. Either way your opinion is totally devalued by your values as indicated by Hugo. Bye bye.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jan 22, 2019 6:34:26 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2019 7:33:53 GMT
So, this document is claiming that there may be serious disruptions to cross-channel trade because of the actions of the French. There is not much we can do about the French being complete and utter barstwards. They are like that because they are! I really don't think we can cancel Brexit just to keep the French happy. There are plenty of other ports in other countries who would only to too happy for the increase in business. Adapt, improvise and overcome. Surely this only applies to goods going INTO the EU. There shouldn't be any problems with trade coming the other way?
|
|
|
Post by South Stand Ultra on Jan 22, 2019 7:50:25 GMT
Ahh, another scare story with the infamous words "could" "might" Just like all the scare stories we had prior to the referendum.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jan 22, 2019 8:05:04 GMT
So, this document is claiming that there may be serious disruptions to cross-channel trade because of the actions of the French. There is not much we can do about the French being complete and utter barstwards. They are like that because they are! I really don't think we can cancel Brexit just to keep the French happy. There are plenty of other ports in other countries who would only to too happy for the increase in business. Adapt, improvise and overcome. Surely this only applies to goods going INTO the EU. There shouldn't be any problems with trade coming the other way? where does it say the French are going to be a pain? It just says the least the French will do is apply the minimum standard checks in a no deal scenario.
on the basis of what it says Rotterdam and Zebrugge will wave stuff through
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2019 8:17:25 GMT
So, this document is claiming that there may be serious disruptions to cross-channel trade because of the actions of the French. There is not much we can do about the French being complete and utter barstwards. They are like that because they are! I really don't think we can cancel Brexit just to keep the French happy. There are plenty of other ports in other countries who would only to too happy for the increase in business. Adapt, improvise and overcome. Surely this only applies to goods going INTO the EU. There shouldn't be any problems with trade coming the other way? where does it say the French are going to be a pain? It just says the least the French will do is apply the minimum standard checks in a no deal scenario.
on the basis of what it says Rotterdam and Zebrugge will wave stuff through
If the EU decide to penalise the UK with their petty actions, then instead of the majority of trade going through Calais, it would be better to spread it out through many more ports. I am not saying that other ports will 'wave stuff through', but I am just saying that if the EU do adopt this policy then just spread the load out. Of course, the EU must understand that if British exports are hit by their actions, then they should not be surprised if the UK reciprocates, and let us not forget that the EU export 80 billion more per year to the UK than the UK does to the EU. The other advantage for the UK is that if there are problems getting imports from the EU, then we will be able to source those same products from elsewhere in the World, where I am pretty sure that other countries would only be too happy for the increased business. Short term pain maybe, for long term gain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2019 8:32:15 GMT
where does it say the French are going to be a pain? It just says the least the French will do is apply the minimum standard checks in a no deal scenario.
on the basis of what it says Rotterdam and Zebrugge will wave stuff through
If the EU decide to penalise the UK with their petty actions, then instead of the majority of trade going through Calais, it would be better to spread it out through many more ports. I am not saying that other ports will 'wave stuff through', but I am just saying that if the EU do adopt this policy then just spread the load out. Of course, the EU must understand that if British exports are hit by their actions, then they should not be surprised if the UK reciprocates, and let us not forget that the EU export 80 billion more per year to the UK than the UK does to the EU. The other advantage for the UK is that if there are problems getting imports from the EU, then we will be able to source those same products from elsewhere in the World, where I am pretty sure that other countries would only be too happy for the increased business. Short term pain maybe, for long term gain. Who do you think will feel the pain most? (In the UK)
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jan 22, 2019 8:34:26 GMT
If the EU decide to penalise the UK with their petty actions, then instead of the majority of trade going through Calais, it would be better to spread it out through many more ports. I am not saying that other ports will 'wave stuff through', but I am just saying that if the EU do adopt this policy then just spread the load out. Of course, the EU must understand that if British exports are hit by their actions, then they should not be surprised if the UK reciprocates, and let us not forget that the EU export 80 billion more per year to the UK than the UK does to the EU. The other advantage for the UK is that if there are problems getting imports from the EU, then we will be able to source those same products from elsewhere in the World, where I am pretty sure that other countries would only be too happy for the increased business. Short term pain maybe, for long term gain. Who do you think will feel the pain most? (In the UK) dam the CBI scaremongering again
www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/22/north-east-england-will-be-hit-hardest-by-no-deal-brexit-says-cbi
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2019 8:43:15 GMT
Is this the same CBI that predicted a recession in the event of a Leave vote winning the referendum? This really is all so childish. The NE was one of the hotspots for Leave votes, and this attempt at making it look as though now they will be hit the hardest is really beyond contempt. This just demonstrates how low the elite class are willing to go. Seriously Spiderman, why even bother reading this nonsense. Don't you understand the underlying message they are trying to promote? I can't believe you fall for it.
|
|