|
Post by montygas on May 7, 2019 8:24:25 GMT
Reduced attendance does mean personal space on the terraces that's the only personal positive I do like stats, and obviously it doesn't factor everything but... I count in 25 league games under GC we have 9(36%) wins, 6(24%) loses & 10(40%) draws. Drag that split percentage out across a season of 46 games we'd be looking at 17 wins, 11 loses & 18 draws. 69 points in total which equates to a finish of about 8th. And just because I have the data...DC's league one performance being; 113 games - 38(33.63%) wins, 47(41.59%) loses, 28(24.78%) draws, total points 162.
|
|
|
Post by montygas on May 7, 2019 8:30:40 GMT
Looking specifically at Home form this season...
GC - 4 wins, 4 loses, 4 draws. DC - 2 wins, 7 loses, 2 draws.
based on an exact repeat we can hope for a few happier Saturday evenings next season.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on May 7, 2019 8:51:34 GMT
I think we have to give Coughlan our full support. DC's problem was he complained about the pitch, and then when it was fixed put out a team that couldn't play on it !!
|
|
|
Post by northridinggas on May 7, 2019 8:56:28 GMT
Looking specifically at Home form this season... GC - 4 wins, 4 loses, 4 draws. DC - 2 wins, 7 loses, 2 draws. based on an exact repeat we can hope for a few happier Saturday evenings next season. Assuming we replace Locks and Bonham with players of equivalent quality. Even better if we can get some creativity in to beat teams that defend in depth when they come to our place
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on May 7, 2019 8:58:15 GMT
People will watch a winning team. Simple
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2019 9:54:52 GMT
Looking specifically at Home form this season... GC - 4 wins, 4 loses, 4 draws. DC - 2 wins, 7 loses, 2 draws. based on an exact repeat we can hope for a few happier Saturday evenings next season. Assuming we replace Locks and Bonham with players of equivalent quality. Even better if we can get some creativity in to beat teams that defend in depth when they come to our place Little chance of replacing Lockyer and Bonham with equivalent quality. Generally, although not always, these players cost money.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2019 10:02:00 GMT
Reduced attendance does mean personal space on the terraces that's the only personal positive I do like stats, and obviously it doesn't factor everything but... I count in 25 league games under GC we have 9(36%) wins, 6(24%) loses & 10(40%) draws. Drag that split percentage out across a season of 46 games we'd be looking at 17 wins, 11 loses & 18 draws. 69 points in total which equates to a finish of about 8th. And just because I have the data...DC's league one performance being; 113 games - 38(33.63%) wins, 47(41.59%) loses, 28(24.78%) draws, total points 162. Interesting stats. So based on that, GC points per game is 1.48, whereas DC got 1.43. Broadly similar and both have mitigating circumstances. GC took over a side that was struggling; DC had a side that needed to adapt to playing up a level (or two levels in quick succession). Equally, GC's stats are very short term given they cover less than a quarter of the games. I'd much prefer to watch DC's football but GC has done a good job on the pitch so far. I do have some reservations about his style but think he must be backed and given the chance to build his team next season. He's earned that chance.
|
|