|
|
Post by chewbacca on Jun 19, 2019 10:47:23 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny.
Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal.
Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal.
Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford.
Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth.
Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak.
|
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,088 
|
Post by Marshy on Jun 19, 2019 10:50:11 GMT
immanent news about Avonmouth VERY SOON ! Yes, it still smells! |
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on Jun 19, 2019 10:54:10 GMT
I think someone misheard.....it's actually 'exciting new signage'!
Apparently we're getting more LED advertising around the pitch!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 19, 2019 10:55:24 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. Can't argue with the stats, I think it's mostly because Jakubiak offers something different though. Reilly is very similar to Nichols IMO, although his finishing it better but his link up play is a bit worse. |
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Jun 19, 2019 10:57:49 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. Can't argue with the stats, I think it's mostly because Jakubiak offers something different though. Reilly is very similar to Nichols IMO, although his finishing it better but his link up play is a bit worse. We've already got a striker that offers something a bit different without scoring. Really don't get the obsession with some people wanting to sign him... |
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 19, 2019 11:09:48 GMT
Can't argue with the stats, I think it's mostly because Jakubiak offers something different though. Reilly is very similar to Nichols IMO, although his finishing it better but his link up play is a bit worse. We've already got a striker that offers something a bit different without scoring. Really don't get the obsession with some people wanting to sign him... Other than Nichols & Reilly, who? I agree, we can do better than Jak - we can't rely on JCH only next season, we need a striker who can at least get 10 goals ffs |
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,448
|
Post by pirate on Jun 19, 2019 11:12:09 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. I don't want Jakubiak and in an ideal world I'd offload Reilly. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 19, 2019 11:22:32 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. I don't want Jakubiak and in an ideal world I'd offload Reilly. Why not keep Reilly Nd off load Nichols? It's going to take Nichols 2 more seasons to catch Reilly at his current strike rate. |
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jun 19, 2019 11:29:49 GMT
We've already got a striker that offers something a bit different without scoring. Really don't get the obsession with some people wanting to sign him... Other than Nichols & Reilly, who? I agree, we can do better than Jak - we can't rely on JCH only next season, we need a striker who can at least get 10 goals ffs I feel sure Sir Tom will come good next season, he needs a new contract ! |
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jun 19, 2019 11:30:30 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. I don't want Jakubiak and in an ideal world I'd offload Reilly. Bring Back the Snake i say ! |
|
|
|
Post by philbemmygas on Jun 19, 2019 11:31:25 GMT
I don't want Jakubiak and in an ideal world I'd offload Reilly. Bring Back the Snake i say !  |
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,448
|
Post by pirate on Jun 19, 2019 11:32:23 GMT
I don't want Jakubiak and in an ideal world I'd offload Reilly. Why not keep Reilly Nd off load Nichols? It's going to take Nichols 2 more seasons to catch Reilly at his current strike rate. I'd get rid of Nichols too if it was possible! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2019 11:38:54 GMT
immanent news about Avonmouth VERY SOON ! The (poisonous) gas The (poisonous) gas You'll never get rid of the (poisonous) gas |
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Jun 19, 2019 11:46:19 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. I have my doubts whether Jak and Reilly will ever become effective L1 players but your stats are very unfair because they are not the number of games they started ! coming on in the last 10 mins or less is hardly played a game!? If you tot up 5 or 6 of those then in my view you can count that as played one game. |
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Jun 19, 2019 11:47:00 GMT
IMO We need to off load Nichols, Payne, Bennett, Mathews and Mensah Nichols = probably on a high wage and apart from falling over does little to improve his scoring rate.  Payne = if he doesn't go then I think he will be on the bench and we don't want that do we? Not too mention he is slow  Bennett = too small and well passed his best, the sooner he takes a pay cut and goes to Swinedon the better  Mathews = non league and another of Clarkes midget army  Mensah = non league and has a poor first touch, very poor, although I think GC will give him a go Reilly, I would keep him, better than any of the above, although that's not difficult |
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Jun 19, 2019 11:49:00 GMT
I do find the treatment Jukubiak and Reilly get quite funny. Jukubiak - Played 38 - Scored 2 - Points 3 - 742 Minutes per Goal. Reilly - Played 30 - Scored 4 - Points 10 - 356 Minutes per Goal. Jukubiak's goals came 48 minutes apart in the same game against Oxford. Reilly scored against Coventry, Fleetwood, Southend and Plymouth. Payne, Lines, Bennett, Martin, Sercombe, Rodman and O Clarke all had better goals per minute ratios than Jakubiak. I have my doubts whether Jak and Reilly will ever become effective L1 players but your stats are very unfair because they are not the number of games they started ! coming on in the last 10 mins or less is hardly played a game!? If you tot up 5 or 6 of those then in my view you can count that as played one game. Minutes per goal was included... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2019 11:52:50 GMT
Either way! I need some rovers news! Being at home the last few days unwell has been well boring! Come on cogs! Sign em up!
|
|
|
|
Post by Fetch on Jun 19, 2019 12:03:21 GMT
A fit THD and Little will hopefully offer us a lot of attacking width. For most of last season we started with Kelly and Clarke, both of who are more defensive-minded. A new striker and another winger and we'll be a good side imo.
In GC interviews and press comments he does mention the need for pacey players quite a lot which is encouraging as its probably the thing opposition players would fear the most, and something we don't have that much of just yet.
Trouble is we have a number of players who are injury risks, like the two you mentioned, so if we have a small squad its vital we can rely on them as much as possible.
I agree with your last sentence but also need a creative midfielder as well imo.
I'd like a creative midfielder to replace Lines, but I get the feeling GC is gonna fill central midfield with battlers, and rely on the fullbacks and wingers to create chances - with Ollie Clarke and/or Sercombe providing an edge-of-area shooting threat with anything JCH doesn't nod in. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 19, 2019 12:17:35 GMT
I totally agree that we have to let some players go but lets be honest with the signings so far we will again face a season fighting relegation and this time probably won't succeed in avoiding it. My reasoning is that we will still struggle to score enough goals without more creativity in the side and also that we can't guarantee that the new defence and goalkeeper will be able to again give us the tremendous defensive record we had last season. What I am saying is that if we cannot get rid of some players then it would be a disaster if we could not still bring in 3-4 creative players whether they be wingers,Central midfield or strikers- I would say 2 strikers,a midfielder and a winger are essential and the more we can bring in BEFORE the two big home friendlies the more chance we have of geling in what could well be as many as 7 players into the starting line up. If GC had said he'd made his major signings I'd be worried but it seems fairly obvious to most of us that's not the case. I'm not sure we can worry too much about "gelling" as quality is more important than just getting bodies though the door. I doubt the transfer window being extended til the end of August really does us any favours this summer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2019 12:17:42 GMT
Either way! I need some rovers news! Being at home the last few days unwell has been well boring! Come on cogs! Sign em up! Being ill is for the weak. Show some gumption man. |
|
