|
Post by matealotblue on Sept 14, 2019 22:12:26 GMT
Who the f**king hell is Roy? Who the f**k is Alice?......that was Roy.🤪
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Sept 15, 2019 0:14:46 GMT
You would get more kudos and respect if you didn’t post with such a self inflated view of yourself Roy, presenting it as if you are at the centre of such talks, when you aren’t. You were leaked information, probably by the same known source that has leaked information to the SC, PC and the other supporters used to create an agenda or for whatever unknown reason. The arrogance of it is astounding. If you really had a humble view of yourself you would either keep it to yourself entirely, (as all good businessmen should do) or be happy to post the name of the company so everyone could have a look and be a judge of whether it’s good or bad. Again your experience might be wide but your judgement may be impaired and biased to your opinion and therefore your supposed authority on the subject in hand to be flawed. Now I understand why you wouldn’t do the latter, there are many ramifications if you did, but the best way to save face Roy, is to keep the bottom half well and truly closed until the club and the AlQadi family decide to announce something? That is their right as the majority shareholders. Of course if I was involved in the Business transaction I would be combing every piece of information available, but you aren’t involved, it’s nothing to do with you. You aren’t a majority shareholder in the club and you aren’t a majority shareholder in any of the companies involved in this project. I feel you're attacking the poster here which is bang out of order. As a moderator it would be a good idea if you set an example and stick to the unwritten rules of the forum. I suggest, if you have an issue with his postings (which I don't btw) you pm him and not try and put him down on here - smacks of bullying to me. I’m not attacking the poster, I am attacking the stance of the poster, the absurdity of his claims and the arrogance to which he speaks and I have pointed out exactly from his postings where that sits, not only that, why it is damaging to the club. The poster has made several claims in the last 135 pages and also to me in PM which in parts I have also published within this long thread, to which he cannot substantiate nor verify but continues to give some cryptic clues to represent the consortium. I have not name called, made false accusations or misrepresented what he has written. If he is writing from opinion then I am free to challenge it with my own. If he is writing based on “fact” he needs to substantiate it with evidence and if he won’t then the integrity of his statement can be freely challenged by anyone who wishes to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Gasshole on Sept 15, 2019 2:01:53 GMT
New Fruit market at the colony ? How bout dat.
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Sept 15, 2019 6:48:36 GMT
I feel you're attacking the poster here which is bang out of order. As a moderator it would be a good idea if you set an example and stick to the unwritten rules of the forum. I suggest, if you have an issue with his postings (which I don't btw) you pm him and not try and put him down on here - smacks of bullying to me. I’m not attacking the poster, I am attacking the stance of the poster, the absurdity of his claims and the arrogance to which he speaks and I have pointed out exactly from his postings where that sits, not only that, why it is damaging to the club. The poster has made several claims in the last 135 pages and also to me in PM which in parts I have also published within this long thread, to which he cannot substantiate nor verify but continues to give some cryptic clues to represent the consortium. I have not name called, made false accusations or misrepresented what he has written. If he is writing from opinion then I am free to challenge it with my own. If he is writing based on “fact” he needs to substantiate it with evidence and if he won’t then the integrity of his statement can be freely challenged by anyone who wishes to do so. Sounds like semantics to me. You are quite obviously attacking the poster, who you seem to have a real issue with. You have given all sorts of reasons why you don't think you are, but that's how it comes across. And that's what counts.
|
|
|
Post by Westy on Sept 15, 2019 6:49:30 GMT
Is there a Fish Market in Bristol ? Asking for a friend. Yep, but it's a pub down on Baldwin Street. If our gates keep falling we could probably host home matches there in the not too distant future. And I'm assuming the smell would match the business behind the club
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Sept 15, 2019 8:16:17 GMT
I’m not attacking the poster, I am attacking the stance of the poster, the absurdity of his claims and the arrogance to which he speaks and I have pointed out exactly from his postings where that sits, not only that, why it is damaging to the club. The poster has made several claims in the last 135 pages and also to me in PM which in parts I have also published within this long thread, to which he cannot substantiate nor verify but continues to give some cryptic clues to represent the consortium. I have not name called, made false accusations or misrepresented what he has written. If he is writing from opinion then I am free to challenge it with my own. If he is writing based on “fact” he needs to substantiate it with evidence and if he won’t then the integrity of his statement can be freely challenged by anyone who wishes to do so. Sounds like semantics to me. You are quite obviously attacking the poster, who you seem to have a real issue with. You have given all sorts of reasons why you don't think you are, but that's how it comes across. And that's what counts. Semantics? Nonsense. I’ve questioned everything in his posts each tine. He has also ignored several others who have asked questions of him. It’s nothing personal, I hope he is right in lots of things. Perhaps you can point out what is exactly attacking the poster or hit the complain button and another mod can mod it.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 15, 2019 8:28:21 GMT
I know it's mentioned a lot, as if it were a golden rule, but the attacking the poster thing is not a rule, afaict, it is just guidance for good posting, and a short-hand way of condemning outright abuse, but doesn't need to be taken literally and out of context.
For example, 'you are a lady garden' is obvious attack on the poster, and is not helpful or positive.
But, 'you are constantly making these sorts of remarks but make no effort to back them up with evidence' is also just as clearly an attack on the poster, but in context could well be in good faith and be constructive and helpful.
Similarly 'That's just bullshit,' or 'that's f**king stupid,' is an attack on the post, but depending on the context could well be unhelpful (it could be a reasonable critique of some f**king stupid bullshit, of course).
So, I would suggest simply saying 'attack the post not the poster' isn't actually a literal description of what should happen, and is actually unhelpful and not accurate if taken too literally and out of context.
It's much better istm to look at posts in context and think about them and decide whether they are helpful or not, and whether they contribute to the debate or not, and whether they hit upon the more relevant aspects of what is being discussed or needs to be said.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 9:51:40 GMT
Any news on this Roy fella?
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Sept 15, 2019 9:59:00 GMT
A takeover will happen in October. Source please! Gaschat 2018
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Sept 15, 2019 10:10:04 GMT
And you have been told this by whom ? No offence, but why would anyone in either the club's current hierarchy, or the developer itself confide in someone who is of no consequence to them and who can't help dropping itk comments on a fans forum ?? Beggars belief sorry. I think you knowjackshit personally but love the attention from saddos who hang onto your every written word. It's not helpful fella. You can be as rude as you like but when you know the real facts and have studied their past record and accounts as I have you will agree we will be in good hands. Can you post the accounts and redacted the names and company numbers?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 13:37:13 GMT
You can be as rude as you like but when you know the real facts and have studied their past record and accounts as I have you will agree we will be in good hands. Can you post the accounts and redacted the names and company numbers? or just tell me your surname and who on Earth you are?
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Sept 15, 2019 14:32:31 GMT
Can you post the accounts and redacted the names and company numbers? or just tell me your surname and who on Earth you are? I do think the forum should allow annonimity. I thought it was a little harsh using his first name in a previous post.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Sept 15, 2019 15:07:23 GMT
or just tell me your surname and who on Earth you are? I do think the forum should allow annonimity. It does, and if anyone feels they have any problems with it then report it immediately....
|
|
|
Post by toddy1953 on Sept 15, 2019 15:14:40 GMT
or just tell me your surname and who on Earth you are? I do think the forum should allow annonimity. I thought it was a little harsh using his first name in a previous post. He actually gave his full name & the fact he has been a supporter since the 1940’s, on this thread back in August sometime (I think).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 16:09:56 GMT
I do think the forum should allow annonimity. I thought it was a little harsh using his first name in a previous post. He actually gave his full name & the fact he has been a supporter since the 1940’s, on this thread back in August sometime (I think). must have been deleted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 17:28:55 GMT
He actually gave his full name & the fact he has been a supporter since the 1940’s, on this thread back in August sometime (I think). must have been deleted. Still there on the row outside the boxes thread.
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Sept 15, 2019 18:33:18 GMT
Still there on the row outside the boxes thread. Firstly, perhaps I should declare my real self. I am Roy Cowell. supporter since 1947, yes, I may not look 76 ( I hope I don't) but I am, a member of the President's Club since the 1960s and Chairman of the PC during the first few years at the Mem. In which I like to think I played a major part in securing the ownership for BRFC. I stand by my pseudonym because I do know a lot about what has happened to BRFC. I class myself as a friend and supporter of the Dunford family, Denis, Geoff, Sharon and Peter. All of whom, have my greatest respect. I am also a friend and supporter of both of the giants who locked horns, Edward Ware and John Harding who are the subject of this thread. For those who do not know Edward, has been a fantastic supporter, Director, and backer of BRFC since he first became a President's Club member when really just a boy (a long time ago). John Harding has been a major supporter and wise head and confident of Denis and Geoff and Vernon Stokes during the important years when the Football Club re-located from Eastville to Bath and back to Bristol over many years of BRFC history. Why should such giants of BRFC history be involved in such angst? well to me. it is obvious. It takes years to understand the heartbeat of a football Club, and Ed and John are passionate people at the sharp end of our Club, who are currently frustrated because the future of the Club is in the hands of those who do not know the history and maybe do not even care? When this Club becomes the property once again, of those who care for all the right reasons, we will 'have our Club back' I am confident that will be soon. From the thread in question
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 18:51:31 GMT
Aha.. I won’t be personal but don’t believe a word written based on that background! Thanks 1981!
|
|
|
Post by CheshireGas on Sept 16, 2019 9:50:56 GMT
Still there on the row outside the boxes thread. Why should such giants of BRFC history be involved in such angst? well to me. it is obvious. It takes years to understand the heartbeat of a football Club, and Ed and John are passionate people at the sharp end of our Club, who are currently frustrated because the future of the Club is in the hands of those who do not know the history and maybe do not even care? When this Club becomes the property once again, of those who care for all the right reasons, we will 'have our Club back'I am confident that will be soon. From the thread in question It was the point I have put in bold that I found of interest. I asked, as this intimates, if the potential purchasers are fans and would return us to fans owning the club and we will 'have our club back' why don't they just buy it now. Why are they waiting until the club gets planning permission or buys a site so that there is a potential upside? If they are simply waiting until it becomes a viable, profitable proposition then they are no different to property speculators or, as the insiders keep eluding to, like the current owners and simply in it to make money. I have yet to receive an answer that stacks up.
|
|
|
Post by kruger on Sept 16, 2019 10:03:22 GMT
Didnt someone say on here he that we should know something by the end of September ?
|
|