|
|
Post by gasandelectricity on Jul 20, 2020 13:51:49 GMT
A very reassuring signing for me. Look forward to seeing him play for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 20, 2020 13:52:21 GMT
A very reassuring signing for me. Look forward to seeing him play for us. Whenever that is. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 20, 2020 13:54:46 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. Being slightly cynical but you'd want him signing a new deal purely because of sell on value at the moment, but you're right that he's likely in the plans. Agree that the 3 at the back seems like the reasonable solution but even then you have 6 CBs on pro deals and that's before you start to include the likes of Grant and Little who can play there. Seems like an awful amount of money to have spent on one position when we have glaring frailties in other places. Although if Davies is out until at least January and Rollin went out on loan then you'd still have 4 players available who can all seemingly do a job in league one so maybe that's what ends up happening. If we're going to develop youngsters into £1m+ player then surely AK's the perfect player to develop, Oxford are apparently hoping to get £3m for Rob Dickie this summer who I doubt was a better prospect than AK at his age. |
|
|
|
Post by Gashead73 on Jul 20, 2020 13:57:36 GMT
I think BG has signed well so far, be interesting to see who else actually comes in now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2020 14:29:05 GMT
Welcome to the gas Jack, look forward to seeing in the quarters.
Really starting to feel positive about the club again, long may it continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jul 20, 2020 14:35:32 GMT
I like Alfie, but could he find himself as a victim of Garner's intent to play from the back? Ends up as RB2 and CB3. He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- |
|
|
|
Post by lavalamp on Jul 20, 2020 14:43:58 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- No room for Bennett? 🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 20, 2020 14:53:52 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Rush back goalie? |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 20, 2020 15:03:35 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Surely is Hare a better option at RWB? Although that CM looks as inspiring as OC/Ogogo/Upson if Grant is going to be played as a DCM, having spent big on 3 players hopefully we've enough in the kitty to sign a decent ACM. Daly looks an out and out No 10 to me so is role would better suit a fit Barrett. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 20, 2020 15:07:24 GMT
I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Surely is Hare a better option at RWB? Although that CM looks as inspiring as OC/Ogogo/Upson if Grant is going to be played as a DCM, having spent big on 3 players hopefully we've enough in the kitty to sign a decent ACM. Daly looks an out and out No 10 to me so is role would better suit a fit Barrett. RWB? CM? OC? DCM? ACM? What the hell? Is it really that difficult? Jesus. |
|
|
|
Post by TAGas on Jul 20, 2020 15:09:03 GMT
Is he going to play Ogogo and Grant in the same team though. 🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jul 20, 2020 15:16:17 GMT
I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Surely is Hare a better option at RWB? Although that CM looks as inspiring as OC/Ogogo/Upson if Grant is going to be played as a DCM, having spent big on 3 players hopefully we've enough in the kitty to sign a decent ACM. Daly looks an out and out No 10 to me so is role would better suit a fit Barrett. just a rough idea of the sort of formation we could play Topper |
|
|
|
Post by piratejames on Jul 20, 2020 15:30:38 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. Being slightly cynical but you'd want him signing a new deal purely because of sell on value at the moment, but you're right that he's likely in the plans. Agree that the 3 at the back seems like the reasonable solution but even then you have 6 CBs on pro deals and that's before you start to include the likes of Grant and Little who can play there. Seems like an awful amount of money to have spent on one position when we have glaring frailties in other places. Although if Davies is out until at least January and Rollin went out on loan then you'd still have 4 players available who can all seemingly do a job in league one so maybe that's what ends up happening. Good point also, but I think Kilgour will be a very important player this year, and Yh we do have 6 and maybe with the Ehmer singing it will be 7 but I would say it’s better to do you business like this rather than lose a few players and then you have to go out looking. I’d expect to see a couple leave on loan. |
|
|
|
Post by piratejames on Jul 20, 2020 15:36:09 GMT
He’s only just signed a new contract so I’d assume he is in BG’s plans. Normally attacking and possession based football is started with 3 at the back, cause you’ve got the cover needed when the full backs are attacking, so I’d image it’s gonna be a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, with the latter making room for wingers as the front three. I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Yh this is the kind of formation I’d imagine he’d go with, gives the best chance for attacking threat, I know that your not saying this is your starting 11 but I’ll give my two cents anyways. I think Ogogo will be a bit part player this year, which is a shame as he looked decent last year, but I don’t think he’s what garner wants or looks for, Rodman will be sub if hare is fit, Leahy has been a frustrating one because he looks brilliant sometimes and then has a shocker, wouldn’t be surprised if we bring in a left sided attacking full back, and assuming that Barrett gets fit he’ll be the other centre mid. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 20, 2020 15:40:24 GMT
Surely is Hare a better option at RWB? Although that CM looks as inspiring as OC/Ogogo/Upson if Grant is going to be played as a DCM, having spent big on 3 players hopefully we've enough in the kitty to sign a decent ACM. Daly looks an out and out No 10 to me so is role would better suit a fit Barrett. RWB? CM? OC? DCM? ACM? What the hell? Is it really that difficult? Jesus. Just ignore my post if you don't understand it, the OP (original poster) did and that's all that matters. |
|
|
|
Post by clampdown on Jul 20, 2020 16:16:00 GMT
I can see us playing a variant of 3 at the back in some shape or fashion. speculative/for illustrative purposes and so no nit picking anybody -----Baldwin--Ehmer---Kilgour Rodman---Ogogo---Grant---Leahy --Nicholson-----------------Daly-- ---------------JCH------------- Yh this is the kind of formation I’d imagine he’d go with, gives the best chance for attacking threat, I know that your not saying this is your starting 11 but I’ll give my two cents anyways. I think Ogogo will be a bit part player this year, which is a shame as he looked decent last year, but I don’t think he’s what garner wants or looks for, Rodman will be sub if hare is fit, Leahy has been a frustrating one because he looks brilliant sometimes and then has a shocker, wouldn’t be surprised if we bring in a left sided attacking full back, and assuming that Barrett gets fit he’ll be the other centre mid. Wouldn't surprise me if one of Ogogo or Upson left, either on a free or more likely on loan with us picking up part of their wage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2020 16:27:22 GMT
RWB? CM? OC? DCM? ACM? What the hell? Is it really that difficult? Jesus. Just ignore my post if you don't understand it, the OP (original poster) did and that's all that matters. 👜 |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 20, 2020 17:13:04 GMT
RWB? CM? OC? DCM? ACM? What the hell? Is it really that difficult? Jesus. Just ignore my post if you don't understand it, the OP (original poster) did and that's all that matters. That's all that matters? Well thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Jul 20, 2020 17:23:22 GMT
Never been the same player since sh*gging Dierdre Barlow..
|
|
|
|
Post by wilmslowgas on Jul 20, 2020 17:31:09 GMT
This is a very encouraging signing. He has the potential to play at a higher level, is young ( for a defender) and has buckets of experience. What is there not to like?
|
|
