Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 4:42:26 GMT
Well I love the fact we didn't have an open top bus tour so that the players and management could go back to their families forget Bristol Rovers and enjoy a well earned rest as soon as possible.Does he expect Lee Brown to be there on the bus to wave at him instead of being with his family to await the birth of the new child? They all deserve so much thanks from us for their fantastic efforts for the last two seasons and we seem a more united club from top to bottom since Wael bought the club than any other time in my 61 years of being a supporter. I now question if those with the OP's attitude should be anywhere near the decision making as their attitude seems one of total negativity. Just because people give their time freely it doesn't mean they are having a positive affect on the club. I am grateful to the OP for exposing the type of attitude he has employed working away in the background for many years. It has been an attitude that has created very little for us and would have continued to do so if the new owners hadn't come in. Thankfully we all have a right to express ourselves too as an ordinary fan not connected to any particular group. I am confident the new positive attitude in the club will overcome the old negativity that has been festering away in the background for years. For once we have a chance to succeed lets all work TOGETHER to achieve that. C'mon Rovers c'mon you blues. Well, what an ungrateful, patronising person you are. The next time you go through the turnstiles,buy a 50/50 ticket,pop into the supporters hut or buy a programme just remind yourself who is serving you and how they give/gave their free time to Rovers. These people have done this for years when the club were on its knees and to think they were helping some of the convinent memory loss brigade in this thread must make their blood boil,if unfortunate enough to read the trash on here. A simple question for you.. The new positive attitude the club now has which you are confident will overcome the old negativity,would you be so confident if the new owners didn't have a money tree in their back garden? Thought not.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on May 21, 2016 4:47:40 GMT
And why doesnt NH take them out and thank them for their efforts for his team during his tenure?
If Nick signed the.good players he also signed a lot of utter dross over the years.
As for the new regime they have been here five minutes. Uplifted the club but appear to be uncovering sh** day by day to put.right
What significant purchase does Jim mean. Dont the SC own the same or even less share than before the share scheme started.
Finall perhaps he should talk to BSS his own SC director who was quick to lament how his hands were tied under NH and co once they were gone
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 4:57:00 GMT
And perhaps the same people who now know and accept that Symour Smith had the clout of a rubber mallet in the boardroom will also realise that, despite the same obstacles,the supporters club chairman and his band of volunteers still gave their services to Rovers out of their love for the club to help keep it going for the us supporters.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on May 21, 2016 5:08:05 GMT
And perhaps the same people who now know and accept that Symour Smith had the clout of a rubber mallet in the boardroom will also realise that, despite the same obstacles,the supporters club chairman and his band of volunteers still gave their services to Rovers out of their love for the club to help keep it going for the us supporters. I.dont think anyone has ever questioned the hard work of volunteers. Having occasionally done things myself i know about having to out of your way. However Jim paints or at least insinuates something that doesnt ring true about the relationship between the SC and the old board There is a place for the SC but probably not as what it thinks it should be (whatever that is) Should the volunteers be thanked? Absolutley. Whilst pointing the finger at Mr Al-Qadi, Jim hardly backed it up with evidence of how Nick Higgs thanked them for their hard work.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 5:29:43 GMT
And perhaps the same people who now know and accept that Symour Smith had the clout of a rubber mallet in the boardroom will also realise that, despite the same obstacles,the supporters club chairman and his band of volunteers still gave their services to Rovers out of their love for the club to help keep it going for the us supporters. I.dont think anyone has ever questioned the hard work of volunteers. Having occasionally done things myself i know about having to out of your way. However Jim paints or at least insinuates something that doesnt ring true about the relationship between the SC and the old board There is a place for the SC but probably not as what it thinks it should be (whatever that is) Should the volunteers be thanked? Absolutley. Whilst pointing the finger at Mr Al-Qadi, Jim hardly backed it up with evidence of how Nick Higgs thanked them for their hard work. I don't think the finger was pointed at Mr Al wadi, I think it was Mr Hamer. I didn't take his post as a rant towards the owners just Hamer decision over the celebrations of promotion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:06:32 GMT
Wow. Posters having a pop at the volunteers for having an opinion! Whatever next?
I'd say the SC chairman is more than entitled to express an opinion on matters tbf.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 21, 2016 6:07:43 GMT
Wow. Posters having a pop at the volunteers for having an opinion! Whatever next? I'd say the SC chairman is more than entitled to express an opinion on matters tbf. Then express it to people who matter, not in public Attention seeker
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:20:27 GMT
Wow. Posters having a pop at the volunteers for having an opinion! Whatever next? I'd say the SC chairman is more than entitled to express an opinion on matters tbf. Then express it to people who matter, not in public Attention seeker Maybe he already has. Attention seeking? Like allowing yourself to be carried down the A38 amongst thousands of drunken footy supporters and singing songs outside of a run down boozer? All this whilst apparently being a billionaire? Hmm so that guy commands supporters ears yet the hard working SC chairman gets told to f**k off!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:23:55 GMT
The dramatic heading should be changed for a start. Are Rovers really ruled by a 'regime'??
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 21, 2016 6:26:05 GMT
Then express it to people who matter, not in public Attention seeker Maybe he already has. Attention seeking? Like allowing yourself to be carried down the A38 amongst thousands of drunken footy supporters and singing songs outside of a run down boozer? All this whilst apparently being a billionaire? Hmm so that guy commands supporters ears yet the hard working SC chairman gets told to f**k off! That post by the SC Chairperson was a long conceived document not a spontaneous action by supporters to carry our president down glos road, hardly the same is it ? I'm pretty sure our President did not plan it or even wanted it but it happened
|
|
|
Post by parsonstgas on May 21, 2016 6:28:27 GMT
Wow. Posters having a pop at the volunteers for having an opinion! Whatever next? I'd say the SC chairman is more than entitled to express an opinion on matters tbf. He's entitled to an opinion and should be respected for his hard work, however, where was his opinion and criticism of Higgs when he made mistake after mistake and told lie after lie. I cannot respect the man's opinion when he's happy to say nothing on behalf of the SC and supporters in general whilst the club is run like a dictatorship for years, bumbling from one disaster to another but no bus tour and the toys are well and truly out of the pram. Bizarre! The blokes out of touch I'm afraid and to me he seems threatened that now we may not be 'Ragbag Rovers' anymore, he will be less important. He should apologise to SH.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:33:01 GMT
Maybe he already has. Attention seeking? Like allowing yourself to be carried down the A38 amongst thousands of drunken footy supporters and singing songs outside of a run down boozer? All this whilst apparently being a billionaire? Hmm so that guy commands supporters ears yet the hard working SC chairman gets told to f**k off! That post by the SC Chairperson was a long conceived document not a spontaneous action by supporters to carry our president down glos road, hardly the same is it ? I'm pretty sure our President did not plan it or even wanted it but it happened No it's not the same. It's just an example of how some things are seen as acceptable and some aren't. The SC chairman's words can draw such negativity because he has taken a swipe at decisions by the new guys yet maybe he has a point? As always, these type of topics will split opinion and there will be some petty arguments on here before HTE locks the thread....
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 21, 2016 6:39:28 GMT
That post by the SC Chairperson was a long conceived document not a spontaneous action by supporters to carry our president down glos road, hardly the same is it ? I'm pretty sure our President did not plan it or even wanted it but it happened No it's not the same. It's just an example of how some things are seen as acceptable and some aren't. The SC chairman's words can draw such negativity because he has taken a swipe at decisions by the new guys yet maybe he has a point? As always, these type of topics will split opinion and there will be some petty arguments on here before HTE locks the thread.... Don't get me wrong, but i don't trust the new owners anymore than the previous owners, but actions speak louder than words and at the moment i don't "See" a lot of "Action" from the family Maybe in the fullness of time we will get to know about all these so called background activities but i'm not so sure we will
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:46:36 GMT
It's quite obvious some people have personal agendas against the SC chairman so whatever he says will be twisted to suit.
I will leave you to it.
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on May 21, 2016 7:02:48 GMT
Bang out of order that. I don't know the bloke personally but I don't think he could do or say anything to Nick Higgs and be listened to, do You? BRSC may well be out of date and touch but just remember all the good they have done for the club over the years when the begging bowls were a regular accurence!! Reading that he is not moaning about the takeover is he? He's pointing out a valid reason to have an open top parade to celebrate promotion from his angle How can you say he is not moaning about the takeover, The thread is titled Supporters club chairman not happy with new regime. Who wrote the title ?
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on May 21, 2016 7:06:58 GMT
How can you say he is not moaning about the takeover, The thread is titled Supporters club chairman not happy with new regime. Who wrote the title ? Realised that after my post (now deleted). Must pay more attention
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on May 21, 2016 7:07:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on May 21, 2016 7:17:03 GMT
No it's not the same. It's just an example of how some things are seen as acceptable and some aren't. The SC chairman's words can draw such negativity because he has taken a swipe at decisions by the new guys yet maybe he has a point? As always, these type of topics will split opinion and there will be some petty arguments on here before HTE locks the thread.... Don't get me wrong, but i don't trust the new owners anymore than the previous owners, but actions speak louder than words and at the moment i don't "See" a lot of "Action" from the family Maybe in the fullness of time we will get to know about all these so called background activities but i'm not so sure we will They have only been here five minutes. It may not work out, but Mr Al-Qadi is a suucesful investment banker, not some fly by night microwave salesman and seems to be assembling a professional team at the club Even if we fall, we will have survived a bit longer than the oblivion we were heading to before hand
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on May 21, 2016 7:20:17 GMT
It's quite obvious some people have personal agendas against the SC chairman so whatever he says will be twisted to suit. I will leave you to it. No personal agenda here. Would like to know the SCs thoughts on the crippling loan we were stuck with, the loss of the court case and where they thought we were heading But i guess that was all nasty sainsburys fault and NH was a very nice man who kept us going
|
|
|
Post by parsonstgas on May 21, 2016 7:32:22 GMT
It's quite obvious some people have personal agendas against the SC chairman so whatever he says will be twisted to suit. I will leave you to it. No personal agenda here. Would like to know the SCs thoughts on the crippling loan we were stuck with, the loss of the court case and where they thought we were heading But i guess that was all nasty sainsburys fault and NH was a very nice man who kept us going Spot on, all of this was allowed to go on unquestioned by the Supporters Club and our Fans Directors, no open top bus though and a public display of criticism towards the Chairman. Hypocrisy.
|
|