|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 24, 2014 10:18:39 GMT
The difficulty with this game is if we were playing a week ahead I would probably have gone for the same team as yesterday but seeing as thought we only have a day in between the two games I have made a few changes.
Mildenhall
Lockyer
Trotman
Parkes
Brown
Gosling
Sinclair
Mansell (C)
Martin
Harrison
Cunnington
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 24, 2014 10:24:02 GMT
Not for me that. I think if you have to play lockyer right back then you need monkhouse in the squad because if there's one thing he does well it is tracking back to cover when lockyer goes forward.
Also I don't think Taylor warrants a drop. He looked dangerous at times and as much as id like to see Ellis play, hes better as an impact sub later on in the game when everyone is getting tired. Then watch the fear on the defenders faces when he runs at them.
Id keep the same squad that won and tell them to play it on the deck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 24, 2014 10:31:13 GMT
Not for me that. I think if you have to play lockyer right back then you need monkhouse in the squad because if there's one thing he does well it is tracking back to cover when lockyer goes forward. Also I don't think Taylor warrants a drop. He looked dangerous at times and as much as id like to see Ellis play, hes better as an impact sub later on in the game when everyone is getting tired. Then watch the fear on the defenders faces when he runs at them. Id keep the same squad that won and tell them to play it on the deck. I like Taylor, I just would like to give him a rest and then bring him on against a tired FGR as he will have a point to prove. |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Aug 24, 2014 10:38:10 GMT
Not for me that. I think if you have to play lockyer right back then you need monkhouse in the squad because if there's one thing he does well it is tracking back to cover when lockyer goes forward. Also I don't think Taylor warrants a drop. He looked dangerous at times and as much as id like to see Ellis play, hes better as an impact sub later on in the game when everyone is getting tired. Then watch the fear on the defenders faces when he runs at them. Id keep the same squad that won and tell them to play it on the deck. I like Taylor, I just would like to give him a rest and then bring him on against a tired FGR as he will have a point to prove. You could say the same for Ellis though. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 24, 2014 10:46:38 GMT
I like Taylor, I just would like to give him a rest and then bring him on against a tired FGR as he will have a point to prove. You could say the same for Ellis though. Yes but Ellis didn't play 80 minutes of football yesterday. Maybe even start White. I just think we need to freshen the team up a bit for this game. FGR should know all about Taylor and as much as I rate the bloke, I can see him getting outmuscled against the likes of Pipe, Coles etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Aug 24, 2014 10:51:09 GMT
Thought Sinclair's still suspended?
|
|
|
|
Post by gasheadnaboo on Aug 24, 2014 10:56:43 GMT
The last thing Clarke needs to be doing is changing a winning team, if we lose (which is quite likely) he will be decimated for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 24, 2014 11:04:33 GMT
The last thing Clarke needs to be doing is changing a winning team, if we lose (which is quite likely) he will be decimated for it. I would normally agree with you but 2 games in 3 days and FGR would have had a good chance to have taken a look at us yesterday, I think it would be naive of us to stick with the same team. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 24, 2014 11:05:33 GMT
Thought Sinclair's still suspended? Only 1 game ban I believe? |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 24, 2014 11:11:36 GMT
Sinclair or Clarke seems the big decision for me, it would be madness to rest Taylor against FGR when he will have a point to prove.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Aug 24, 2014 11:24:13 GMT
If Sinclair plays he will most likely be playing against his brother, who looks even more like Jesus than O'Toole!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 24, 2014 11:26:16 GMT
I had Sinclair out for 3 games! That's s good option. He will be up for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by WeAreTheGas on Aug 24, 2014 11:36:05 GMT
Did Sinclair not get a straight red for stopping their bloke when he was last man? I assumed straight red cards always warranted a 3-match ban?
Anyway, I can see both sides of the argument. I can see why you'd want to keep a winning team, and I can also see why it might be a good idea to freshen it up a bit seeing as FGR will have an extra day's rest over us.
I have no idea what I'd go for tbh! Need height on the pitch though to defend corners and freekicks. We know they have two massive lumps upfront and are a team that bombards you aerially.
|
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Aug 24, 2014 12:01:45 GMT
For me the interesting opponent will be the winger Freer whom DC said didn't want him because he wouldn't be able to play in front of a big crowd. Very much hope he is right tomorrow!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gastroenteritis on Aug 24, 2014 12:16:48 GMT
Not for me that. I think if you have to play lockyer right back then you need monkhouse in the squad because if there's one thing he does well it is tracking back to cover when lockyer goes forward. Also I don't think Taylor warrants a drop. He looked dangerous at times and as much as id like to see Ellis play, hes better as an impact sub later on in the game when everyone is getting tired. Then watch the fear on the defenders faces when he runs at them. Id keep the same squad that won and tell them to play it on the deck. This, but I would swap Ollie Clarke with "the beard" give us a bit more presence in the midfield. |
|
|
|
Post by parsonstgas on Aug 24, 2014 14:15:14 GMT
I'm so surprised that Monkhouse or Sinclair are getting in the team ahead of Gosling. Our best creative and ball player for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Aug 24, 2014 14:49:27 GMT
So does anyone actually know how long Sinclair is out for?
|
|
|
|
Post by WeAreTheGas on Aug 24, 2014 14:53:58 GMT
They're saying 1 game on the FGR forum too, because it was a 'professional foul' you get a lesser punishment apparently.
Good news if so, I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 24, 2014 14:59:03 GMT
Surely there's nothing apparent about it, a player is sent off for a professional foul it's just a one game ban, serious foul play is a 3 game ban. Sinclair's was the former.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Aug 24, 2014 15:19:50 GMT
Surely there's nothing apparent about it, a player is sent off for a professional foul it's just a one game ban, serious foul play is a 3 game ban. Sinclair's was the former. Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk Straight red in the PL and FL is an automatic 3 game ban regardless of the offence as far as I'm aware. |
|
