|
Sad day
Apr 19, 2024 18:32:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 19, 2024 18:32:48 GMT
Boycott!
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 19, 2024 15:07:15 GMT
Luton v Brentford 1-0. Sheff utd v Burnley 1-1. Huddersfld v Swansea 1-1. Blackpool v Barnsley 0-2. Gas v Posh 2-1. Donnie v Barrow 1-2. Grimsby v Swindon 0-1. Tranny v Wimbledon 2-0. Blyth v Brackley 2-1. Hereford v Boston 3-2. Scarboro v Alfreton 3-0. Aveley v Bath 1-0.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 17, 2024 16:10:31 GMT
Good appointment. Stevenage had a wobble, but they didn't fall over.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 17, 2024 7:32:28 GMT
Ward 6.5 done most things right. Hoole 6.5 nice forward movement. Taylor 6 still not to his best Baggott 7 best of defence. Vale 7.5 excellent! Thomas 8 m o m dazzling! Rossiter 6.5 ok but still needs more time. Evans 7.5 decent lay off to LT for the ball but his dead ball deliveries leave a lot to be desired. Aguilera 5 inaffective. Sinclair 6 looked ok rightfully subbed. Martin 7 all he does is score goals....and miss them!
Cox Connolly 5 strange sub. Gordon Brown 4 done his usual nothing apart from regulation shot and regulation save. Conteh 7 better than his replacement. McCormick Vaughan 5 looks like a child out there but he ran around the playground a bit
Ref 6.5 got some things wrong but majority right. Soft pen. Cambridge 5.5 steady 3rd division team looked pacey and well organised.
Yea ok a good win MT, we again failed to score when on top and only the woodwork and clearance off the line stopped it being a credible draw for both sides.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 16, 2024 22:21:29 GMT
Just got back..
Lovely eve on the malecon glos road where the drinks in the restaurant is cheaper than the pub!? At least you can pay cash though.... and have a choice.
Anyhoos, onto something far less important..
As 0-0s were going, this one was heading in a decent direction until m o m LT decided to do something special again, like make another run. His precision passing and breaking runs is a gem... he's also laid on more balls than my ex. Definitely worthy of accolades here.
And, Bags until substitution... don't know why? I thought he was our best defender.
Scotty again looking dangerous.
Yep we played some pretty stiff until the penalty area...but we're getting around this and dominating some teams in final third.
Really liked Luca tonight and Vale. Even Evans passed one decent ball...
I think we possessed better technical abilities than Cambridge who were well organised, physical and fast....they looked dangerous from set pieces and counter....yep they're a good strong architect 3rd division outfit.
Nice for CM to continue to score. The pen award was soft, and a joke shot really, we're obviously in this zone where can't define a penalty taker atm. Good job we're not off to Euros I guess.
A good win, I suppose, MT .... Now we move on to Peterborough and jch love in. What could possibly go wrong...?
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 16, 2024 15:26:12 GMT
Get your sun tan lotion out as we're on Severn Beach so you know what sort of match to expect!
Anyone who wants it more will get it.
So, if we stuff Cambridge I'm sure Gary Monk will give them a mouthful.... imagine that? A mouthful of Gary Monk... 🤔
Anyways I digress.... £5.10 is too much for lager in this establishment, I guess we'll have to try another.....oh and the match?
Yea...a bore 0-0 probably. Only 2 to go after this....🥱
Enjoy the eve everyone....*hic*
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 15, 2024 10:54:15 GMT
It's like the third time I've posted it. Prison. There's none as blind as those who choose not to see..
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 14, 2024 9:58:37 GMT
From Ifollow..
Cox 7 it's right for him to be brought back. Hunt 7 offered outlet on right moving forward. Wilson 6 looked shaky. Baggott 8 commanding performance, almost m o m but hit the post. Vale 7.5 very good assist and all round play. Thomas 7.5 dangerous to them. Ward 5 hope he's ok but injured again. Evans 5 cr@p dead ball deliveries and shots. Rossiter 8 nice to see him back and look like he enjoyed his first start back. Sinclair 8 m o m record breaking goal, almost scored again and wound back the years to make himself undroppable with menacing their defence. Martin 7.5 working progress and put in a shift on his own.
Aguilera 7.5 took his goal well, again in front of the adoring GasHeads. Conteh 5 didn't do much.
Ref 6.5 ok.
Cheltenham 4 poor. Relegation written all over them. Any team with that winker in it deserves relegation so DC can't have his snake and eat it!
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 14, 2024 9:02:59 GMT
Nice to see the original green and black in a rare TV footage.
Not nice to see us wearing red.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 14, 2024 9:01:36 GMT
Just got back.. From stop start iFollow.
It looked like our team with full potential v our team last time out!?
Well well well, you play your strongest team and hey presto!? ....you get a positive response!? Who would have thought it...?
It kinda makes the last few matches where presumably we haven't played our strongest available team, a bit of a joke on those paying and travelling Gas fans.... because not everyone lives in BS7?
MT comments..... what a plum.
Really liked some contributions today. Scotty was immense and a constant threat. Scored a record breaking goal and finished well.. My m o m.
Baggy looking like the stable defender we've needed all season, added a goal to his CV and hit post too.
CM worked hard and his timely header set up the assist for 2nd goal.
And of course, welcome back, Rossiter.
LT just loves running at them. Nice assist or two . Wing back? Ok for a few minutes, but his best position is attacking wing play.....so the formula was simple all along, MT, play players in their rightful natural positions and balance the team out!?
Also, think about playing 2 up front at some point..(?)
Cheltenham were poor. Heads went down on the first goal. DC has worked a miracle just to get them into the running for relegation escape, but they're slump in form at this critical time and a horrendous last couple of matches might prove too much.
At least he can dust himself down. And take the lesson you can't have your snake and eat it... 🐍
Well done MT for a regulation win, but for me over all, the jury is very much out.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 13, 2024 10:12:44 GMT
On ITV4....(+1 later).
18th April 1981.
Highlights of Luton Town v Bristol Rovers.....you can catch it on +1. Let's just say some things never do blinking well change....🤬
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 13, 2024 10:01:18 GMT
Tough choices today for this one....I mean, flip flops or sandals!?
Overpaid, non interested, and some only have a four game potential to ever see again in Gas shirt....make the most of this spectacular festival!
I'll plump for a 1-0 Gas win. Deflected own goal. Won't be easy, they're playing for their lives.
Safe journey everyone and enjoy the next sh!t show
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 11, 2024 16:58:12 GMT
Hang on?
I thought talking about sacking of a club employee was an abomination, completely unethical and morally obtuse!?
As per other threads on this matter, I shall remain completely neutral and sit on the fence!
Some double standards here....
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Apr 11, 2024 16:48:55 GMT
Burnley v Brighton 0-2. Notts F v Wolves 1-2. Brum v Coventry 0-1. Millwall v Cardiff 1-1. PNE v Norwich 0-2. Bolton v Pompey 1-1. Cambridge v Charlton 1-0. Chelts v Gas 0-1. Oxturd v Posh 2-2. Shrews v Wycombe 0-0. M K Dons v Mansfield 1-2. Swindon v Wimbledon 1-1.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 24, 2024 9:29:09 GMT
Only if you know your ACAS from your elbow.. Which some posts here I do question if they do. Ps....much love, bluetooth 🥰 I am aware of ACAS, and the fact that details of cases they may have been involved in are not in the public domain, whereas Employment Tribunals take place in a public court. Yes, TT. Good post. One procedure can follow the other. Obviously acas has been more well known in much bigger cases of conciliation such as Strike actions etc. It was a tongue in cheek remark that on stage may have gotten a titter..
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 24, 2024 9:19:08 GMT
I know exactly what I'm on about and exactly some of the bods involved..... unfortunately. OK. Fair enough. But you can't link us to any evidence to back up your claims. You also can't tell us where to look/search for the evidence to back up your claims. However you insist your claims are verifiable....so how can we verify them? Companies will bury payouts deep in their accounts where no one will find them. Both sides will often want all details kept out of the public record (and different sides will have different reasons for that). So I'm still at a loss as to how we substantiate your claims... Thanks for your reply. Exactly that, the settlements can be covered up and lost so probably the best for all parties. I would start with a timeline of employed staff from then until now, but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 24, 2024 9:08:20 GMT
I know exactly what I'm on about and exactly some of the bods involved..... unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 23, 2024 16:12:36 GMT
I'm afraid that's not correct ,if a case has been heard in a tribunal it is listed and a matter of public knowledge. Correct. Apparently the truth is out there, but we are all too stupid or lazy to find it, the only person who has the research super power is O2O2. Only if you know your ACAS from your elbow.. Which some posts here I do question if they do. Ps....much love, bluetooth 🥰
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 22, 2024 20:44:52 GMT
And that's the reason why you don't know. So when we are told to do our research there is nothing we can actually research - only ITKers will know? A quick internet search shows Bristol Sport versus one of their employees is officially documented and publicly available. I couldn’t see anything for Bristol Rovers, perhaps those smarter than me can find something? In the meantime I’ll take with a pinch of salt these allegations that TG has caused Rovers into a litigation that has cost the clubs thousands. If a quick internet search is the extent of your research, that's a fair enough post. But I'm not here to fan the flames of a lazy researcher. There are peoples lives concerned. Decent hard working and loyal staff that have been affected. It's not up to me to assist you out your lazy bed, e.... you're far better than that. And so am I. It's a shame TG can't acknowledge some of his mistakes have led to these type of threads and unfortunately the club to spend needless £ to litigants but hey we are where we are and it's not the club I recognise. It might be for you, have a blast.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 22, 2024 20:37:54 GMT
Seriously? Does it matter specifically whom? If you know anyone in and around the club post his appointment that had been established, you would know who. Even the most little of research would delve into that and anyone can do that for themselves.... you'll get there eventually. Sorry but 'research' doesn't help those of us with little to no direct involvement. Sounds more like 'who you know, not what you know.' Without something tangible all this is, is hearsay and innuendo. Help us understand, but you'll need to be more open. Yep totally get the point. And well made. As you'll totally understand my position too and we are in an impasse... I'm not here to do the whole bastion of work and deliver it to the table warm and ready to go....there are stories out there, I've pointed everyone in the right direction to research. I know what I know. But placing it in a fish and chips paper for you isn't what am about without express permission of everyone concerned. I'm sure you would agree. Apologies for the frustrations, but it doesn't take away the facts....no matter how much they are publicly disclosed, or not. So....dig a bit deeper and the truth will be revealed.
|
|