|
Post by yattongas on Jul 20, 2017 14:06:20 GMT
Got to be honest, I can never understand the annual fuss about kit designs. Home kit blue and white quarters and away kit whatever ....job done. More worried about who's wearing the kits than design.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2017 14:55:42 GMT
I like both of them. Not sure that I'd have been happy with a "BC" logo on the away one!
|
|
|
Post by stapletongas on Jul 20, 2017 15:37:43 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering.
Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in.
|
|
|
Post by gaelgas on Jul 20, 2017 15:44:41 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Point is that no players tuck their shirts in anymore so were the quarters asymmetrical they would look ridiculous. Next you'll be suggesting we all wear our trousers just under our chests like old men, fashions change is all. Also these shirts are designed to be worn by our (hopefully athletic) squad, not some overweight middle-aged bloke on the terraces!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2017 15:49:17 GMT
I'm 55 and just ordered both. I will be wearing them around sunny Telford to the bemusement of the armchair premier team fans as well as when I am down for a match. I'm a gashead and I'll wear what I want. Your mums pants ? Must admit, when iwas wearing his mums pants theye did smell nice..
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Jul 20, 2017 15:51:22 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Point is that no players tuck their shirts in anymore so were the quarters asymmetrical they would look ridiculous. Next you'll be suggesting we all wear our trousers just under our chests like old men, fashions change is all. Also these shirts are designed to be worn by our (hopefully athletic) squad, not some overweight middle-aged bloke on the terraces! "Some overweight middle-aged bloke on the terraces".... I've never seen one of those
|
|
|
Post by stapletongas on Jul 20, 2017 16:18:35 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Point is that no players tuck their shirts in anymore so were the quarters asymmetrical they would look ridiculous. Next you'll be suggesting we all wear our trousers just under our chests like old men, fashions change is all. Also these shirts are designed to be worn by our (hopefully athletic) squad, not some overweight middle-aged bloke on the terraces! No my point is not about how they look on the players...my point is we are selling shirts to fans, average blokes. Many complaints about sizing last year, but it wasn't the sizing, they are designed for a tight fit. The problem is many fans can't or don't want to wear them like that and go a few sizes bigger, resulting in the quarters looking ridiculous. If we are selling shirts to fans then let's not have them looking unflattering.
|
|
|
Post by syg on Jul 20, 2017 16:38:11 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Losing weight is a good way around that.
|
|
|
Post by gaelgas on Jul 20, 2017 16:50:58 GMT
Point is that no players tuck their shirts in anymore so were the quarters asymmetrical they would look ridiculous. Next you'll be suggesting we all wear our trousers just under our chests like old men, fashions change is all. Also these shirts are designed to be worn by our (hopefully athletic) squad, not some overweight middle-aged bloke on the terraces! No my point is not about how they look on the players...my point is we are selling shirts to fans, average blokes. Many complaints about sizing last year, but it wasn't the sizing, they are designed for a tight fit. The problem is many fans can't or don't want to wear them like that and go a few sizes bigger, resulting in the quarters looking ridiculous. If we are selling shirts to fans then let's not have them looking unflattering. I understood what your point was, but the point is these shirts are first and foremost match day shirts for our players not fashion items for fans. Whether there should be supporters shirts specifically designed as an option for fans is a different question, personally I'd probably look like a Zeppelin in a condom whether there were a supporters option or not, but either way, I reiterate, these are designed primarily for our players to play in. Unless you think our players should be made to play in small marquees just so you don't feel a bit self conscious when wearing your replica shirt.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jul 20, 2017 16:54:38 GMT
I like both of them. Not sure that I'd have been happy with a "BC" logo on the away one! BC. Before Clarke. It's how our future success will always be measured. What's not to like?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2017 16:54:39 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Relax, it's just a footy shirt.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jul 20, 2017 16:56:21 GMT
I like both of them. Not sure that I'd have been happy with a "BC" logo on the away one! BC. Before Clarke. It's how our future success will always be measured. What's not to like? AD, After Daniel?
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jul 20, 2017 17:07:52 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. So you're saying Macron should design their kits around fat blokes rather than athletes?
|
|
|
Post by gaelgas on Jul 20, 2017 17:09:33 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. So you're saying Macron should design their kits around fat blokes rather than athletes? Old fat blokes that still tuck their shirts into their trousers
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2017 17:11:10 GMT
Just pre ordered an away kit for my son. Will be interesting to see how long it takes to arrive. No delivery date given.
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jul 20, 2017 17:18:22 GMT
Just pre ordered an away kit for my son. Will be interesting to see how long it takes to arrive. No delivery date given. Hopefully the club should be on the ball with it this time after the kit problems we've had over the last couple of years.
|
|
|
Post by stapletongas on Jul 20, 2017 17:42:23 GMT
So you're saying Macron should design their kits around fat blokes rather than athletes? Old fat blokes that still tuck their shirts into their trousers A few thousand more "fat blokes" will wear them than athletes
|
|
|
Post by stapletongas on Jul 20, 2017 17:43:11 GMT
Once again the quarters are cocked up. Having top and bottom symmetrical means that anyone with a less than athletic frame has the divide line down near their waist which just looks stupid and unflattering. Quarters should be even with the shirt tucked in. Losing weight is a good way around that. If you only knew me...
|
|
|
Post by gaelgas on Jul 20, 2017 17:55:36 GMT
Old fat blokes that still tuck their shirts into their trousers A few thousand more "fat blokes" will wear them than athletes That's irrelevant, they are designed to be worn by footballers not fat blokes. Again, if you are arguing there should be an alternative available for fat fans, fine, but these shirts are for our players to play in and should be designed to meet their needs first!! They are not leisure shirts worn by footballers they are football shirts that we fans can buy.
|
|
|
Post by Okebournegas on Jul 20, 2017 17:56:05 GMT
Losing weight is a good way around that. If you only knew me... Judging by that remark You're either the size of john candy or a Chippendale ?
|
|