Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2020 14:08:50 GMT
What's that got to do with a trade deal? We trade on WTO terms at the minute, have they threatened higher tariffs if we don't grant all these Visas which you seem to think they want, or are you just trying to provoke an argument over immigration? Best you read up a bit Oldgas Read? There is reading and then there is understanding. |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 24, 2020 14:10:13 GMT
Best you read up a bit Oldgas Read? There is reading and then there is understanding. Oops . My bad. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2020 14:11:52 GMT
Read? There is reading and then there is understanding. Oops . My bad. He gives a great impression of doing neither. |
|
|
|
Post by devonblue on Nov 25, 2020 8:09:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Nov 25, 2020 12:47:05 GMT
What's that got to do with a trade deal? We trade on WTO terms at the minute, have they threatened higher tariffs if we don't grant all these Visas which you seem to think they want, or are you just trying to provoke an argument over immigration? Best you read up a bit Oldgas What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 25, 2020 12:56:20 GMT
Best you read up a bit Oldgas What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. Perhaps Oldie could borrow some of your salt? He's played you at your own game and like a fiddle no less. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564 
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 25, 2020 13:15:44 GMT
Best you read up a bit Oldgas What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. Not just The Guardian though. "India wants an easier visa regime for Indians, cross-border movement of services professionals and a possible bilateral social security agreement later on, as part of its negotiations with the United Kingdom on a proposed trade pact. It is also confident of bagging most of the demands as both nations remain eager to wrap up talks soon." www.google.com/amp/s/wap.business-standard.com/article-amp/economy-policy/india-eyes-services-concessions-easier-visa-rules-in-uk-trade-pact-120092501216_1.html |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 25, 2020 13:28:22 GMT
Best you read up a bit Oldgas What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. He’s rattled 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 25, 2020 13:29:32 GMT
What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. He’s rattled 😂 Ps love the fact that he had to go off and read up , took him a day or so . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2020 14:00:06 GMT
What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. Perhaps Oldie could borrow some of your salt? He's played you at your own game and like a fiddle no less. Blimey Such vitriol. Unbecoming of people of a certain age. But, it does display a certain lack of vocabulary. |
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Nov 25, 2020 14:11:00 GMT
What's new in any of the reading up? As far back as 2016 turncoat May was talking to India about doing a deal and visas were part of the discussion. It probably meant nothing in reality, because if that cow had got her surrender deal we would probably have been forbidden by the EU from striking our own deals with any other country. As I understand it we are still negotiating with India and of course there is now no interference from the EU. The subject of a visas are part of the discussion, however as a small, crowded island we are keen to manage this aspect and want a guarantee from India that the will accept back their people who have overstayed their visa time limit. I don't see a problem with any of that, or reaching an agreement on those terms, do you? Oh, and most of the references I found were in The Guardian, as you might expect, because they're always keen to publish anything they can to throw doubt on BREXIT. So I would advise having a tablespoon of salt handy. And Oldie, if you've managed to find time away from your Marxist-Capitalist trading with the world business to read this, you can go and * yourself. Not just The Guardian though. "India wants an easier visa regime for Indians, cross-border movement of services professionals and a possible bilateral social security agreement later on, as part of its negotiations with the United Kingdom on a proposed trade pact. It is also confident of bagging most of the demands as both nations remain eager to wrap up talks soon." www.google.com/amp/s/wap.business-standard.com/article-amp/economy-policy/india-eyes-services-concessions-easier-visa-rules-in-uk-trade-pact-120092501216_1.htmlIstr OldGas actually saying the Guardian was his choice of newspaper. He then interestingly said thats with the exception of anything political, because then they become ridiculous marxist idiots etc. Which is funny, because I very much doubt their style of writing suddenly changes completely, more just that OldGas doesn't like what they're saying. The comment did make me laugh though, "and of course there is now no interference from the EU". When did the EU get involved in any India-UK trade deal? It's just making something up and then using that to drive home a point that doesn't exist in the first place. Disappointing to see such language again in here from a certain side. I believe that only FranceGas & trevor are the only ones not to abuse others at this point? |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 25, 2020 14:29:25 GMT
Istr OldGas actually saying the Guardian was his choice of newspaper. He then interestingly said thats with the exception of anything political, because then they become ridiculous marxist idiots etc. Which is funny, because I very much doubt their style of writing suddenly changes completely, more just that OldGas doesn't like what they're saying. The comment did make me laugh though, "and of course there is now no interference from the EU". When did the EU get involved in any India-UK trade deal? It's just making something up and then using that to drive home a point that doesn't exist in the first place. Disappointing to see such language again in here from a certain side. I believe that only FranceGas & trevor are the only ones not to abuse others at this point? To be fair we couldn't have a bilateral deal with India as trade was through the EU, so he does have a point there, however the trade is not huge and the EU and India have been in talks for some time. What I do find funny is the notion that this is some sort of Brexit bonus, it won't even start to make good the damage nor does the (non EU) immigration rules, something always in our gift. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 25, 2020 21:08:00 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2020 9:24:14 GMT
A strange silence descends around the leave voters. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 26, 2020 9:33:21 GMT
A strange silence descends around the leave voters. Freeeeeeedommmm!!!! Now remind me, what happened to William Wallace in Braveheart? |
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 26, 2020 9:35:14 GMT
A strange silence descends around the leave voters. Freeeeeeedommmm!!!! Now remind me, what happened to William Wallace in Braveheart? Stuck in a HGV queue last I heard |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 26, 2020 9:52:47 GMT
Freeeeeeedommmm!!!! Now remind me, what happened to William Wallace in Braveheart? Stuck in a HGV queue last I heard Very good. 😀 Mind you, Scotland went alone for a while, had several wars with England then eventually bankrupted itself and then formed a union with England anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Nov 26, 2020 10:13:12 GMT
Stuck in a HGV queue last I heard Very good. 😀 Mind you, Scotland went alone for a while, had several wars with England then eventually bankrupted itself and then formed a union with England anyway. I'm hoping they vote for Independence soon. |
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Nov 26, 2020 10:20:51 GMT
Ps love the fact that he had to go off and read up , took him a day or so . No, working shifts and having a family life means that sometimes I don't have time to immediately respond. I do have to admire the likes of Oldie though. Here he is, a man who has conducted business with every country ever mentioned on this forum, yet he has the time to immediately make what he thinks is shrewd and pithy comment and Officer Dibble has the time to make completely inaccurate observations. Yatton, I know you are desperately upset that I haven't railed against us doing a deal with India that may allow a bit more immigration in return for better trading arrangements and some kind of arrangement where they will accept back their people who have overstayed. Far better that than being in the EU's pocket where we have to accept unfettered access, interference with our laws and the theft of much of our fishing stock. Oh, and of course we won't have to pay India £15 billion a year for the priveledge. Whats not to like? we'll be free in just over a month! Get the champagne in the fridge boys, we're gonna have a party. Not you Oldie, you Marxists don't approve of such Capitalist frivolity. |
|
stuart1974
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,564
Member is Online
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 26, 2020 10:24:37 GMT
Ps love the fact that he had to go off and read up , took him a day or so . No, working shifts and having a family life means that sometimes I don't have time to immediately respond. I do have to admire the likes of Oldie though. Here he is, a man who has conducted business with every country ever mentioned on this forum, yet he has the time to immediately make what he thinks is shrewd and pithy comment and Officer Dibble has the time to make completely inaccurate observations. Yatton, I know you are desperately upset that I haven't railed against us doing a deal with India that may allow a bit more immigration in return for better trading arrangements and some kind of arrangement where they will accept back their people who have overstayed. Far better that than being in the EU's pocket where we have to accept unfettered access, interference with our laws and the theft of much of our fishing stock. Oh, and of course we won't have to pay India £15 billion a year for the priveledge. Whats not to like? we'll be free in just over a month! Get the champagne in the fridge boys, we're gonna have a party. Not you Oldie, you Marxists don't approve of such Capitalist frivolity. Champagne? How ironic. 😀 |
|
