|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Oct 14, 2014 8:52:49 GMT
I'd have Gow, but none of the lot that went to Tranmere. Woodards I'd take without the injuries!
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Oct 14, 2014 8:53:29 GMT
Sorry Mark, I stronly disagree. We were relegated needing just a point. Gill and Richards both played games for us. One was poor the other failed to score enough. Every player that played any part of a match contributed to our relegation. We didn't just drop points after Gill and Richards left. Gill wasn't involved with the first team all season - so nothing to discuss. Whereas Richards, in my view, was having his best season for us by far and was only lacking goals to support his all-round performances. When he left we were far higher in the table than when we finished. The team as we know was set up to defend rather than score and Richards also suffered because of this because he was made to play wide left and right in a 4 - 5- 1 formation. The thing with Richards is he looks promising without any real end product.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Oct 14, 2014 9:02:43 GMT
No doubt he should have scored more, but he was the only player I remember last season who could create a chance for himself - the rest of the forward line non-existent !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
tranmere
Oct 14, 2014 9:17:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2014 9:17:37 GMT
No doubt he should have scored more, but he was the only player I remember last season who could create a chance for himself - the rest of the forward line non-existent ! And if he had we may have stayed up!
|
|
|
Post by fanboy on Oct 14, 2014 11:12:08 GMT
I'd have Gow, but none of the lot that went to Tranmere. Woodards I'd take without the injuries! Anyone in League One, Two and the conference would have Danny Woodards without the injuries. Unfortunately I don't think that exists.
|
|
|
Post by Gashead73 on Oct 14, 2014 12:45:04 GMT
Think we had a lucky/good escape with Gill and Woodards. As for Richards I have mixed feelings, I never really rated him but I would have loved to be proved wrong, sadly I was proved almost right as I do believe chopping and changing his positions did not help!!!
Im still kind of 60/40 against?
|
|