|
Post by baggins on Oct 10, 2019 12:47:13 GMT
I can honestly say, without breaking any Confidentiality agreement, that I have Scampi and chips for dinner. There, I said it. Posh git. What did you have for starters, soup in a basket? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Oct 10, 2019 12:50:18 GMT
All this ITK stuff has been pretty boring for a while now, whether it be this or the fruit market/takeover. I'm more annoyed that people care more about their ego and knowing stuff in confidence that the first thing they do is leak it to the press. Now MK Dons and all the teams know and can prepare accordingly. Are people's lives that sad that they leak information such as this, they not got anything better to do? I can honestly say, without breaking any Confidentiality agreement, that I have Scampi and chips for dinner. There, I said it. But you failed to disclose that you also had a cool glass of Estrella Damm, unforgivable
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Oct 10, 2019 12:53:04 GMT
I can honestly say, without breaking any Confidentiality agreement, that I have Scampi and chips for dinner. There, I said it. But you failed to disclose that you also had a cool glass of Estrella Damm, unforgivable That was hush hush. See you in Court.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 13:55:05 GMT
Or get JCH to feign an injury to keep him out for 5 weeks. That could send us down the table & the 28m could become 26m, even better deal. Seeing it’s guess what happens next time, what about the AlQadi’s sell us for pennies but keep the Mem. We stay rent free until new stadium is built, then they sell land for houses & slip away. Oh wait on, what if that takes another 40 years. 😩 they cannot keep mem they have a claim with companys house against mem when club sold that is first thing paid efl will not agree a deal on basis that a owner keeps stadium unless that owner buys stadium for current value from the football club prior to any sale of club its happened in championship mem belongs to brfc 1883 ltd and has claim registered against it by current owner standard practice that would be cleared in event of sale This is all very interesting but how did JCH strain his calf ffs
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Oct 10, 2019 14:02:34 GMT
So a director wants JCH out, the injury is fake, we are only keeping him for now to bump up the value of the club.
Oh, and the moon landings were faked. And I just saw Elvis Presley in the Wellington.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 14:08:57 GMT
This is all very interesting but how did JCH strain his calf ffs swinging who up yo wit wit?
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Oct 10, 2019 14:29:10 GMT
they cannot keep mem they have a claim with companys house against mem when club sold that is first thing paid efl will not agree a deal on basis that a owner keeps stadium unless that owner buys stadium for current value from the football club prior to any sale of club its happened in championship mem belongs to brfc 1883 ltd and has claim registered against it by current owner standard practice that would be cleared in event of sale This is all very interesting but how did JCH strain his calf ffs Tripped over his wallet
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 14:37:35 GMT
Assuming GC isn't one of the 4 who would it be Dunne Maher He says in the interview the assistant manager didn’t know He should feel annoyed about not being confided in.
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Oct 10, 2019 14:42:08 GMT
Thanks How is it a fact? Can you say more? You claim to be just a fan who doesn’t know anything then make these comments, forgive me for being confused here but nothing you have said here has been confirmed or even rumoured in the media, nor a source quoted. in theory a director who is selling is involved so all directors involved but maybe there is one who disapproved yes that's a fact 100% You are getting mixed up between directors and shareholders. Directors such as Steve Hamer, Tom Gorringe and Martyn Starnes are employees with directors in title, they do not have a controlling interest in the club, they are employed to run the business. The shareholders which are DS owned by the ALQs are the only ones with a controlling interest. So why would any of the 3 directors have any say over whether JCH gets a contract or not, and whether that effects a value of the club that he will lose personally? It’s Hani who signs off the debt or any other costs, not the board directors, they are there to ensure the accounts are constructed, audited and presented correctly. The only way that would change is that would be if one of our directors is also brokering a deal at a very specific price on which he gets paid by the potential new buyer. So it’s not in his interest that way. Which means then is a conflict of interest and that director is not acting in the best interests of BRFC and he’s trying to get paid at both ends. His salary by the club and a lump sum as a broker. Which isn’t only greedy it’s also snide. So either we are dealing with an even bigger snake than Matty Taylor or you are making 💩 up. If we are dealing with another snake then it’s in your interest to name them now.
|
|
|
Post by mariobalotelli on Oct 10, 2019 15:11:47 GMT
It's......... Rebekah Vardys account
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 15:14:16 GMT
Well it’s presented as fact...? Kinda like a few things in your recent posts. You know a little more than you let on me thinks??! 🤔 I know nothing im not itk im just a fan , lets say you wanted to buy brfc say for 28 mil as a guess figure if then jch gets new deal you then pay more ie 30 mil better to stay on same deal now then improve his contract after you buy the club saves you 2 mil ,,lets say a current board member was part of a deal to buy the club then that director would do all he could to get club cheaper Surely a current director involved in selling the club could not have a role in buying the club because that would break all kinds of Conflicts of Interests rules? All of the valuations and contracting and commercials would go through a separate independent company and under the conflict of interest rules you have to declare that you have a conflict of interest and you are then veto’d on having a vote or decision influencing capability in relevant meetings such as board meetings etc. I know this as I’m involved in governance stuff as part of my day job
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 10, 2019 15:27:22 GMT
in theory a director who is selling is involved so all directors involved but maybe there is one who disapproved yes that's a fact 100% Y ou are getting mixed up between directors and shareholders.
Directors such as Steve Hamer, Tom Gorringe and Martyn Starnes are employees with directors in title, they do not have a controlling interest in the club, they are employed to run the business. The shareholders which are DS owned by the ALQs are the only ones with a controlling interest. So why would any of the 3 directors have any say over whether JCH gets a contract or not, and whether that effects a value of the club that he will lose personally? It’s Hani who signs off the debt or any other costs, not the board directors, they are there to ensure the accounts are constructed, audited and presented correctly. The only way that would change is that would be if one of our directors is also brokering a deal at a very specific price on which he gets paid by the potential new buyer. So it’s not in his interest that way. Which means then is a conflict of interest and that director is not acting in the best interests of BRFC and he’s trying to get paid at both ends. His salary by the club and a lump sum as a broker. Which isn’t only greedy it’s also snide. So either we are dealing with an even bigger snake than Matty Taylor or you are making 💩 up. If we are dealing with another snake then it’s in your interest to name them now. Surely that depends on which "directors" the BP was referring to, I doubt they have inside knowledge to know it was one of the ALQ's rather than the club's BoD who were against JCH getting a pay rise?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 15:41:41 GMT
Y ou are getting mixed up between directors and shareholders.
Directors such as Steve Hamer, Tom Gorringe and Martyn Starnes are employees with directors in title, they do not have a controlling interest in the club, they are employed to run the business. The shareholders which are DS owned by the ALQs are the only ones with a controlling interest. So why would any of the 3 directors have any say over whether JCH gets a contract or not, and whether that effects a value of the club that he will lose personally? It’s Hani who signs off the debt or any other costs, not the board directors, they are there to ensure the accounts are constructed, audited and presented correctly. The only way that would change is that would be if one of our directors is also brokering a deal at a very specific price on which he gets paid by the potential new buyer. So it’s not in his interest that way. Which means then is a conflict of interest and that director is not acting in the best interests of BRFC and he’s trying to get paid at both ends. His salary by the club and a lump sum as a broker. Which isn’t only greedy it’s also snide. So either we are dealing with an even bigger snake than Matty Taylor or you are making 💩 up. If we are dealing with another snake then it’s in your interest to name them now. Surely that depends on which "directors" the BP was referring to, I doubt they have inside knowledge to know it was one of the ALQ's rather than the club's BoD who were against JCH getting a pay rise? But if they don’t know they shouldn’t say or they should say a club source. I’m with 1981 on this in that I think this is fake news - breaking of Conflicts of Interest is extremely serious stuff with significant potential commercial consequences
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2019 16:55:17 GMT
Surely that depends on which "directors" the BP was referring to, I doubt they have inside knowledge to know it was one of the ALQ's rather than the club's BoD who were against JCH getting a pay rise? I have no ideal if a bung has happend
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Oct 10, 2019 17:17:46 GMT
I have no ideal if a bung has happend Should be our new logo:
|
|
|
Post by bristolsfinestever on Oct 10, 2019 17:37:44 GMT
Surely that depends on which "directors" the BP was referring to, I doubt they have inside knowledge to know it was one of the ALQ's rather than the club's BoD who were against JCH getting a pay rise? I have no ideal if a bung has happend Now that is the correct Bristolian phonetic way to spell idea ... gert lush moi babber!
|
|
|
Post by spacegas on Oct 10, 2019 17:47:51 GMT
Sorry but this thread is a complete load of tosh, nobody knows the truth apart from the people involved so unless you are here under a pseudonym then I’m not interested in all your well intentioned but sh**e theories..😁
|
|
|
Post by smudge1 on Oct 10, 2019 17:49:26 GMT
If 4 people knew about the injury one being GC, one JCH, it can only be his two housemates that live with him Tom Davies and Abu Ogogo! They must have known
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Oct 10, 2019 18:14:46 GMT
If 4 people knew about the injury one being GC, one JCH, it can only be his two housemates that live with him Tom Davies and Abu Ogogo! They must have known And Rebekah Vardy
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 10, 2019 18:59:18 GMT
they cannot keep mem they have a claim with companys house against mem when club sold that is first thing paid efl will not agree a deal on basis that a owner keeps stadium unless that owner buys stadium for current value from the football club prior to any sale of club its happened in championship mem belongs to brfc 1883 ltd and has claim registered against it by current owner standard practice that would be cleared in event of sale This is all very interesting but how did JCH strain his calf ffs He’s been limping around all season , I suppose it wasn’t necessary one particular moment . Probably had a slight tear that has got worse through playing every week.
|
|