|
|
Post by peterparker on Nov 15, 2019 11:32:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Nov 17, 2019 7:56:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Nov 17, 2019 9:04:49 GMT
That picture is definitely a photoshop job because he's wearing the wrong clothes and he never went upstairs in that house  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2019 9:56:03 GMT
That picture is definitely a photoshop job because he's wearing the wrong clothes and he never went upstairs in that house Apparently he doesnt sweat either. Bloke is an absolute plank (add degenerate) And, we pay for this. |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 17, 2019 10:45:36 GMT
He`s telling the truth about being in the pizza house though. I know this, because I was behind him in the queue.
I recall it clearly, because he had the Slaughterhouse Five with scotch bonnet peppers.
I remember thinking, "That`s one royal arse that`s gonna suffer in the morning."
|
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Nov 17, 2019 11:17:02 GMT
it wasn’t the most convincing was it. He remembers having a pizza in 2001 but can’t remember meeting a pretty blonde? I have to say my memory works the opposite.
He’s probably posed for 100s if photos through the years and I bet this one isn’t the only one of him with his arm around the girl.
Thing is, in 2001 we didn’t have camera phones, digital camera were in their infancy and in no way small enough to carry around in your back pocket. So we have to assume it’s a negative film image and if it wasn’t her camera, how did she get the photo? And if she wanted it taken, why?
The problem that we all have is that there have been many accusations against celebs and prominent people which some have been proven true and others false and the main protagonist is now dead so we will never know the real truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2019 11:25:52 GMT
it wasn’t the most convincing was it. He remembers having a pizza in 2001 but can’t remember meeting a pretty blonde? I have to say my memory works the opposite. He’s probably posed for 100s if photos through the years and I bet this one isn’t the only one of him with his arm around the girl. Thing is, in 2001 we didn’t have camera phones, digital camera were in their infancy and in no way small enough to carry around in your back pocket. So we have to assume it’s a negative film image and if it wasn’t her camera, how did she get the photo? And if she wanted it taken, why? The problem that we all have is that there have been many accusations against celebs and prominent people which some have been proven true and others false and the main protagonist is now dead so we will never know the real truth. Really He has his arm around a young lady, in her teens. He associates himself with a guy who was later convicted of trafficking young women in the States. She was 17, the girl in the photo. That's statutory rape in the USA. He has never disputed the veracity of the photo, only claims he didnt sleep with her. Why was he even there, at a party with teenage girls? The bullshit he came out with in that interview was sickening, so removed from reality it beggars belief. Just another dickhead with an inflated sense of entitlement. |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 17, 2019 12:43:10 GMT
I would have thought that, ( even after all this time ) the pizza story would be possible to prove/disprove.
There must still be people around, who worked there at the time. They`d surely remember if Prince Andrew and his two children came into their place of work.
Not something you see every day; a member of the RF ordering his grub in a Pizza Express.
If nobody remembers it, then I`d say he`s lying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2019 12:45:09 GMT
I would have thought that, ( even after all this time ) the pizza story would be possible to prove/disprove. There must still be people around, who worked there at the time. They`d surely remember if Prince Andrew and his two children came into their place of work. Not something you see every day; a member of the RF ordering his grub in a Pizza Express. If nobody remembers it, then I`d say he`s lying. Indeed sir. I will go for lying. |
|
|
|
Post by South Stand Ultra on Nov 18, 2019 15:11:41 GMT
It was unbecoming....... Fair play to her for pulling him up after saying that!
|
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Nov 18, 2019 18:28:23 GMT
Fascinating how his mysterious non-sweating condition seems to have cleared up.
I wonder which now-dismissed advisor dreamed that one up as a plausible answer?
|
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 19, 2019 18:37:15 GMT
Fascinating how his mysterious non-sweating condition seems to have cleared up. I wonder which now-dismissed advisor dreamed that one up as a plausible answer? Wait until he`s dragged in front of the FBI to give evidence. He`ll probably deny he ever met Emily Maitlis. "On the evening in question, I was, er, in the Star Of Bengal curry emporium in Esher. I distinctly remember it because I had my two dogs, Woofer and Sootie with me, and they weren`t allowed inside, so they had to sit in the car while I ate my Lamb Bhuna with egg fried rice. Phew, it was a scorcher. Fortunately I don`t sweat." Seriously, it would be interesting what would happen, if he was caught lying under oath. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2019 12:57:56 GMT
One of Epstein's bestest bestest friends was Slick Willy Clinton. Funny how the media, especially in the US, are keeping very quiet about this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2019 18:05:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Nov 20, 2019 21:50:56 GMT
Stepping down from his 'duties'?
A tour round a factory, a chauffeur driven limo and a nice lunch somewhere.
How will we ever manage without him?
Bloody Royal Family. Who the hell are these people anyway in the 21st Century?
We bow and scrape in their presence like a bunch of medieval serfs.
|
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 21, 2019 7:43:21 GMT
One thing that intrigues me, the word "rape" is never mentioned.
"Forced to have sex" is the phrase that`s always used. Is there a difference?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 8:50:38 GMT
First the disclaimer: I do not condone what Epstein did as I don't know the facts.
However, the whole Prince Andrew case throws up some interesting thoughts. Last night I was with some German friends and I was asked why Prince Andrew is being treated the way he is because it is alleged he had sex with a 17 year old girl? The Germans find the whole case to be really strange. Why is that? Well, what does the following list of countries have in common...
Germany, Austria, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Estonia, Bosnia, Albania, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Andorra and San Marino.........The age of consent in all these places is fourteen years old. This is just in Europe.
In France, Sweden, Poland, Denmark, Greece, Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Iceland, Croatia, Slovenia and Monaco it is fifteen years of age.
In Italy, under certain circumstances, it is thirteen years of age!
Another odd one is the Vatican City, where it is sixteen for males but fourteen for females !
The main point I am trying to make is that my German friends were totally amused as in their eyes he hasn't done anything wrong. It's perfectly legit, legal and in their opinion, normal ! This is what they were saying to me. Remember, Germans are very pragmatic. One woman said this to me, "So, she was 17. She traveled the world on private yachts, private planes, partied with the rich and famous, lived in a fantastic house, probably given fantastic gifts, cloths etc, and in return she opened her legs. She knew what she was doing."
The point is that there is not a single country in Europe where the age of consent is over sixteen. So, have all the lawmakers in every European country got it wrong, or is this just a media issue?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 10:54:58 GMT
He could always go and work here..........  |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 21, 2019 11:37:18 GMT
First the disclaimer: I do not condone what Epstein did as I don't know the facts. However, the whole Prince Andrew case throws up some interesting thoughts. Last night I was with some German friends and I was asked why Prince Andrew is being treated the way he is because it is alleged he had sex with a 17 year old girl? The Germans find the whole case to be really strange. Why is that? Well, what does the following list of countries have in common... Germany, Austria, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Estonia, Bosnia, Albania, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Andorra and San Marino.........The age of consent in all these places is fourteen years old. This is just in Europe. In France, Sweden, Poland, Denmark, Greece, Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Iceland, Croatia, Slovenia and Monaco it is fifteen years of age. In Italy, under certain circumstances, it is thirteen years of age! Another odd one is the Vatican City, where it is sixteen for males but fourteen for females ! The main point I am trying to make is that my German friends were totally amused as in their eyes he hasn't done anything wrong. It's perfectly legit, legal and in their opinion, normal ! This is what they were saying to me. Remember, Germans are very pragmatic. One woman said this to me, "So, she was 17. She traveled the world on private yachts, private planes, partied with the rich and famous, lived in a fantastic house, probably given fantastic gifts, cloths etc, and in return she opened her legs. She knew what she was doing." The point is that there is not a single country in Europe where the age of consent is over sixteen. So, have all the lawmakers in every European country got it wrong, or is this just a media issue? It`s not just a question of age though, Nobby. According to her lawyers, she was forced to have sex. The age of consent doesn`t come into it, if consent isn`t given. Oldie is ( way ) past the age of consent, but if you force him to have sex, don`t be surprised if you find yourself sitting opposite Emily Maitlis. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 16:10:39 GMT
First the disclaimer: I do not condone what Epstein did as I don't know the facts. However, the whole Prince Andrew case throws up some interesting thoughts. Last night I was with some German friends and I was asked why Prince Andrew is being treated the way he is because it is alleged he had sex with a 17 year old girl? The Germans find the whole case to be really strange. Why is that? Well, what does the following list of countries have in common... Germany, Austria, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Estonia, Bosnia, Albania, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Andorra and San Marino.........The age of consent in all these places is fourteen years old. This is just in Europe. In France, Sweden, Poland, Denmark, Greece, Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Iceland, Croatia, Slovenia and Monaco it is fifteen years of age. In Italy, under certain circumstances, it is thirteen years of age! Another odd one is the Vatican City, where it is sixteen for males but fourteen for females ! The main point I am trying to make is that my German friends were totally amused as in their eyes he hasn't done anything wrong. It's perfectly legit, legal and in their opinion, normal ! This is what they were saying to me. Remember, Germans are very pragmatic. One woman said this to me, "So, she was 17. She traveled the world on private yachts, private planes, partied with the rich and famous, lived in a fantastic house, probably given fantastic gifts, cloths etc, and in return she opened her legs. She knew what she was doing." The point is that there is not a single country in Europe where the age of consent is over sixteen. So, have all the lawmakers in every European country got it wrong, or is this just a media issue? It`s not just a question of age though, Nobby. According to her lawyers, she was forced to have sex. The age of consent doesn`t come into it, if consent isn`t given. Oldie is ( way ) past the age of consent, but if you force him to have sex, don`t be surprised if you find yourself sitting opposite Emily Maitlis. Only if I complained. Seriously. There ladies were abused and the age of consent in the States is 18, under that its statutory rape. That Germans think it's ok for middle aged (and older) men to use their wealth to and perhaps power to abuse ladies like this says an awful lot about Germans and even more about the cowardice of those who dont confront them. |
|
