Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2020 23:11:43 GMT
In fairness to garner quite a few players did not perform under him at all and its possible they were hoping maher/mansell would have got a contract until the end of the season. Its understandable human behaviour because "if its not broke why fix it?".
But now everybody should be onside and the team can play the game that garner wants.
Regarding the "long term vision" if we stick with it then its a great idea and such things have worked very well for clubs like brentford,bristol city and coventry so why not us?.
|
|
|
Post by eastgas on Jul 30, 2020 23:56:39 GMT
A long term vision and a club identity is what fans have wanted for so long. I find it hard to see how people can find a negative in this, what is it that people are feeling to still be causing some of the negativity?
|
|
|
Post by Wembley_Gas on Jul 31, 2020 2:15:52 GMT
A long term vision and a club identity is what fans have wanted for so long. I find it hard to see how people can find a negative in this, what is it that people are feeling to still be causing some of the negativity? We’re all different, part of what makes the forum what it is! Say, for example, Wael decides to reward every member of gaschat with 20p each...the majority would say “Well we can all do with a bit extra cheers” ...but... Horfield would say “must be a tax relief scam” GI would say “Suspicious, this is to divert attention from what he’s doing in the boardroom “ and LPG would say “it’s not enough, previous owners would have given 40p shows how values have slipped!” sometimes we need cautious naysayers to rein us happy clappers in or else we’d all be like Candide spouting Leibniz “all is for the best" in the "best of all possible worlds". However, I still reserve the right to have a half full glass rather than a half empty one!
|
|