Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 14:46:52 GMT
Untrue. We’d be in a better, more financially secure place. Perhaps even with more Stadium project progress. Could you please explain how that would have been achieved. Sit back Stuart, don't offend him and he will possibly answer your question.
|
|
|
Post by Big Jock on Jun 11, 2021 14:51:34 GMT
Thanks for th update Wael good stuff.
Sadly th thread has since been hi jacked, IMO someone or a small group of people have decided to start slagging our owner off an try to find angles to criticise what he’s done/is doing using half truths an speculation. Luckily, Wael al Qadi is very good at ignoring this kinda rubbish which has long been thrown at him so will think nothing of it an maybe even afford himself a small chuckle at them. Maybe we should follow his suit. 👍
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 14:53:55 GMT
We'd be gone if it wasn't for him. Untrue. We’d be in a better, more financially secure place. Perhaps even with more Stadium project progress. That’s an interesting point of view. Would you be so kind as to share the facts which have led you to this conclusion? Cheers
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Jun 11, 2021 14:56:56 GMT
Could you please explain how that would have been achieved. Sit back Stuart, don't offend him and he will possibly answer your question. It'll be interesting if he does do me the courtesy of a detailed response. We'll see.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 14:57:39 GMT
You're a bit of a dick aren't you harrystoke. Mods? One of the forum rules is that if you behave in a way that deliberately winds up other posters dont come running to the mods when someone calls you out on it. Another rule is that if you do nothing but deliberately provoke and fan the flames you will end up with a ban, which is what you are hoping for isnt it, so you can go running back and tell everyone how the awful Mods here dont allow reasonable debate. Dressing it up in polite language and faux innocence wont make any difference. Those are the facts my dear friend.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 14:57:58 GMT
Only a bit of a dick baggins. I would suggest a big dick! Again mods? Is this abuse on someone with an alternative opinion acceptable? Yes, in your case it is.
|
|
|
Post by rememberhalifax on Jun 11, 2021 14:58:21 GMT
I note several posters have asked' Harrystoke' ,respectfully, how we would be better off without Wael? an answer does not seem to be forthcoming so many will come to the conclusion that the afore mentioned has an openly hostile agenda against our honourable owner?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 15:00:30 GMT
I note several posters have asked' Harrystoke' ,respectfully, how we would be better off without Wael? an answer does not seem to be forthcoming so many will come to the conclusion that the afore mentioned has an openly hostile agenda against our honourable owner? Because he is a dick.
|
|
|
Post by Planning Gas on Jun 11, 2021 15:10:03 GMT
I note several posters have asked' Harrystoke' ,respectfully, how we would be better off without Wael? an answer does not seem to be forthcoming so many will come to the conclusion that the afore mentioned has an openly hostile agenda against our honourable owner? Because he is a dick. Shocking Hugo, suck language from one so young ! Now go sit on the naughty step and compose 500 lines saying "i say not call people dicks/knobs"
|
|
|
Post by clockendgas on Jun 11, 2021 15:26:47 GMT
Maybe harry is the winner of last weeks one hundred and eleven million on the euro lotto, maybe hes planning a takeover?
|
|
|
Post by Wembley_Gas on Jun 11, 2021 15:36:36 GMT
Thanks for th update Wael good stuff. Sadly th thread has since been hi jacked, IMO someone or a small group of people have decided to start slagging our owner off an try to find angles to criticise what he’s done/is doing using half truths an speculation. Luckily, Wael al Qadi is very good at ignoring this kinda rubbish which has long been thrown at him so will think nothing of it an maybe even afford himself a small chuckle at them. Maybe we should follow his suit. 👍 Unfortunately an open letter often invites a closed response from certain quarters!
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Jun 11, 2021 15:38:41 GMT
One of the forum rules is that if you behave in a way that deliberately winds up other posters dont come running to the mods when someone calls you out on it. Another rule is that if you do nothing but deliberately provoke and fan the flames you will end up with a ban, which is what you are hoping for isnt it, so you can go running back and tell everyone how the awful Mods here dont allow reasonable debate. Dressing it up in polite language and faux innocence wont make any difference. Those are the facts my dear friend. Running back where Hugo? I think I can guess.
|
|
|
Post by harrystokegas on Jun 11, 2021 15:46:08 GMT
One of the forum rules is that if you behave in a way that deliberately winds up other posters dont come running to the mods when someone calls you out on it. Another rule is that if you do nothing but deliberately provoke and fan the flames you will end up with a ban, which is what you are hoping for isnt it, so you can go running back and tell everyone how the awful Mods here dont allow reasonable debate. Dressing it up in polite language and faux innocence wont make any difference. Those are the facts my dear friend. Well there we have it ladies and gents, the mods on this site allow this sort of behaviour. You’ve opened the floodgates to a torrential flow of name calling, toxicity and unpleasantness with this I do hope you recognise this. But hey ho, I’m not not in charge of this site. All I’ve come to do is engage in civil debate but it seems like you can’t get it here, if you bizarrely don’t adhere to some bloke with an owl in his profile.
|
|
|
Post by harrystokegas on Jun 11, 2021 15:47:21 GMT
I note several posters have asked' Harrystoke' ,respectfully, how we would be better off without Wael? an answer does not seem to be forthcoming so many will come to the conclusion that the afore mentioned has an openly hostile agenda against our honourable owner? Because he is a dick. Further proof but its as if I needed it. I won’t be stooping to your level.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 15:47:47 GMT
One of the forum rules is that if you behave in a way that deliberately winds up other posters dont come running to the mods when someone calls you out on it. Another rule is that if you do nothing but deliberately provoke and fan the flames you will end up with a ban, which is what you are hoping for isnt it, so you can go running back and tell everyone how the awful Mods here dont allow reasonable debate. Dressing it up in polite language and faux innocence wont make any difference. Those are the facts my dear friend. Well there we have it ladies and gents, the mods on this site allow this sort of behaviour. You’ve opened the floodgates to a torrential flow of name calling, toxicity and unpleasantness with this I do hope you recognise this. But hey ho, I’m not not in charge of this site. All I’ve come to do is engage in civil debate but it seems like you can’t get it here, if you bizarrely don’t adhere to some bloke with an owl in his profile. Congratulations. Looks like we are making progress. Glad you got what you came here for. You're welcome.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 15:48:09 GMT
Further proof but its as if I needed it. I won’t be stooping to your level. Nor I yours.
|
|
|
Post by harrystokegas on Jun 11, 2021 15:48:21 GMT
Untrue. We’d be in a better, more financially secure place. Perhaps even with more Stadium project progress. That’s an interesting point of view. Would you be so kind as to share the facts which have led you to this conclusion? Cheers Read the other thread that I started. I’ve given plenty of reasons there. I suspect you have and are being pedantic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 15:49:26 GMT
That’s an interesting point of view. Would you be so kind as to share the facts which have led you to this conclusion? Cheers Read the other thread that I started. I’ve given plenty of reasons there. I suspect you have and are being pedantic. Thanks - i'll go and have a look.
|
|
|
Post by harrystokegas on Jun 11, 2021 15:49:27 GMT
Well there we have it ladies and gents, the mods on this site allow this sort of behaviour. You’ve opened the floodgates to a torrential flow of name calling, toxicity and unpleasantness with this I do hope you recognise this. But hey ho, I’m not not in charge of this site. All I’ve come to do is engage in civil debate but it seems like you can’t get it here, if you bizarrely don’t adhere to some bloke with an owl in his profile. Congratulations. Looks like we are making progress. Glad you got what you came here for. You're welcome. I came to impart a few hard truths, and I think I got them across judging by the reaction.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 11, 2021 15:49:56 GMT
That’s an interesting point of view. Would you be so kind as to share the facts which have led you to this conclusion? Cheers Read the other thread that I started. I’ve made loads of unsubstantiated claims that I refuse to back up. I suspect you have and are being pedantic. Fixed that for you. You're welcome.
|
|