|
Post by baggins on Oct 17, 2021 7:27:11 GMT
If I may, I'll come back to this thread later on tomorrow afternoon. Bit late on parade but I reckon Tuesday night review is in order.
|
|
|
Post by mftc on Oct 17, 2021 18:01:47 GMT
I have no coaching badges, but surely it is just common sense :-
Alfie cant play on the left and we should have men on the post for corners.
There is constantly square pegs in round holes.
Sounds like we just got lucky v wasteful Bradford.
The only team outside the bottom 7 or 8 we have beaten are the mighty Crawley.
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Oct 18, 2021 8:02:27 GMT
Joey IN.
|
|
|
Post by richhertford on Oct 18, 2021 10:17:32 GMT
So here we are. Another Monday morning. I was so pumped up by the last 30 minutes on Saturday that I went to a family party, started drinking and just kept going. I regretted that decision on Sunday. At 62 it was a bit daft. Now that the dust has settled - a win tomorrow and surely we can start to dream we have turned the corner. I’m with Joey - no doubt team is playing much better. We are a fit machine these days. So few gaschatters have voted on this poll. Time for some on here to review or vote for first time. Most fans on Saturday were very supportive of Joey. I agree JOEY IN.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Oct 18, 2021 10:26:29 GMT
So here we are. Another Monday morning. I was so pumped up by the last 30 minutes on Saturday that I went to a family party, started drinking and just kept going. I regretted that decision on Sunday. At 62 it was a bit daft. Now that the dust has settled - a win tomorrow and surely we can start to dream we have turned the corner. I’m with Joey - no doubt team is playing much better. We are a fit machine these days. So few gaschatters have voted on this poll. Time for some on here to review or vote for first time. Most fans on Saturday were very supportive of Joey. I agree JOEY IN. Let's not get too ahead of ourselves, loss tomorrow night and it's re-think time.
|
|
|
Post by richhertford on Oct 18, 2021 10:28:54 GMT
So here we are. Another Monday morning. I was so pumped up by the last 30 minutes on Saturday that I went to a family party, started drinking and just kept going. I regretted that decision on Sunday. At 62 it was a bit daft. Now that the dust has settled - a win tomorrow and surely we can start to dream we have turned the corner. I’m with Joey - no doubt team is playing much better. We are a fit machine these days. So few gaschatters have voted on this poll. Time for some on here to review or vote for first time. Most fans on Saturday were very supportive of Joey. I agree JOEY IN. Let's not get too ahead of ourselves, loss tomorrow night and it's re-think time. A win tomorrow and we will be ahead of ourselves. Certainly an expectation for me.
|
|
|
Post by pucklegas on Oct 18, 2021 10:31:59 GMT
It seems the players are playing for him I'm in the stick camp at the moment we cant afford to be chopping and changing every 6 months will financially kill us.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Oct 18, 2021 10:38:52 GMT
Let's not get too ahead of ourselves, loss tomorrow night and it's re-think time. A win tomorrow and we will be ahead of ourselves. Certainly an expectation for me. Can't remember the last time I was ahead of myself. Or behind myself. Interesting. And a bit weird.
|
|
|
Post by richhertford on Oct 18, 2021 11:06:50 GMT
Just take this in. On 18th October Just 210 gas chat members had voted in this poll. An incredibly small amount of members are actively involved in this. It’s hard to use this poll as a representative sample of the gaschat base. Even less if we include fan base. To build any credibility in this poll many more need to vote. I wait to see the figure increasing. As I said 210 people. Take that in.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Oct 18, 2021 11:14:31 GMT
Just take this in. On 18th October Just 210 gas chat members had voted in this poll. An incredibly small amount of members are actively involved in this. It’s hard to use this poll as a representative sample of the gaschat base. Even less if we include fan base. To build any credibility in this poll many more need to vote. I wait to see the figure increasing. As I said 210 people. Take that in. A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it.
|
|
|
Post by richhertford on Oct 18, 2021 11:24:53 GMT
Just take this in. On 18th October Just 210 gas chat members had voted in this poll. An incredibly small amount of members are actively involved in this. It’s hard to use this poll as a representative sample of the gaschat base. Even less if we include fan base. To build any credibility in this poll many more need to vote. I wait to see the figure increasing. As I said 210 people. Take that in. A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. I love facts and science in normal life but I’m a football fan as emotional about the gas as the ones around me on Saturday. A few more victories and we will all be happy.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Oct 18, 2021 11:27:58 GMT
Just take this in. On 18th October Just 210 gas chat members had voted in this poll. An incredibly small amount of members are actively involved in this. It’s hard to use this poll as a representative sample of the gaschat base. Even less if we include fan base. To build any credibility in this poll many more need to vote. I wait to see the figure increasing. As I said 210 people. Take that in. A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. The forum only matters when you are getting what you need out of it. Then, it's not important and insignificant apparently. We saw that a little before, those who were challenging had an attempt to silence them made. Now, because of that the mood has changed and here we are dismissing the whole forum as insignificant. Theres a word for that. Couple that with the fact that the other day he started his own poll on here titled should Barton stay (before the mods deleted it) which I'm sure would have been far more representational of the fan base should poll results have gone his way. Its laughable really.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Oct 18, 2021 12:07:06 GMT
Just take this in. On 18th October Just 210 gas chat members had voted in this poll. An incredibly small amount of members are actively involved in this. It’s hard to use this poll as a representative sample of the gaschat base. Even less if we include fan base. To build any credibility in this poll many more need to vote. I wait to see the figure increasing. As I said 210 people. Take that in. A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. I accidently pressed the button twice, hope that doesn't ruin the stats?
|
|
|
Post by SleepyGas on Oct 18, 2021 14:23:07 GMT
A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. I accidently pressed the button twice, hope that doesn't ruin the stats? Stop the count!
|
|
|
Post by SleepyGas on Oct 18, 2021 14:23:24 GMT
I accidently pressed the button twice, hope that doesn't ruin the stats? Stop the count! (damn autocorrect )
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Oct 18, 2021 14:30:12 GMT
A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. I love facts and science in normal life but I’m a football fan as emotional about the gas as the ones around me on Saturday. A few more victories and we will all be happy. As you keep saying over and over again. I do quite like the glass half full positive approach Rich but it does feel like you try and ram it down other people’s throats at the expense of everything else at times.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 18, 2021 14:37:17 GMT
It seems the players are playing for him I'm in the stick camp at the moment we cant afford to be chopping and changing every 6 months will financially kill us. How many times have to thought that in the recent past against the league's bigger club's, Sunderland (home) (TC's 600th) Sunderland (away), Pompey (TW's first game in charge) P'boro & Charlton (both away), only for the players to revert to normal the following game? Tomorrow's a crunch game as we usually follow a decent performance with a poor one. If we play well then at least it'll show they are playing for JB not just because they wanted to impress in front of a large crowd.
|
|
|
Post by richhertford on Oct 18, 2021 14:57:21 GMT
I love facts and science in normal life but I’m a football fan as emotional about the gas as the ones around me on Saturday. A few more victories and we will all be happy. As you keep saying over and over again. I do quite like the glass half full positive approach Rich but it does feel like you try and ram it down other people’s throats at the expense of everything else at times. It only seems like it. Facts suggest otherwise. Too much emotion and judgement on my posts from some just isn’t helpful. Some over react to far too many posts. I’m just having fun enjoying this moment as we start a run to the play offs. Happy days. Let’s focus on the football.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Oct 18, 2021 15:09:53 GMT
A sample size of 210 is perfectly reasonable to get a pretty accurate picture of a wider population, all things being equal. What isn't reasonable to do so, is a self-selecting sample like this. So if you're gonna disparage the accuracy of the poll (and why not, it's probably not very accurate) on mathematical grounds then you can do, but not for the reason you are claiming. In any case, why suddenly invoke science, when your posts are usually more concerned with a gibberish sort of rationale? More people voting won't really build credibility. In any case, I don't think anyone's really claiming the poll is scientific, so you don't really need to worry about pretending to refute it. I accidently pressed the button twice, hope that doesn't ruin the stats? Don’t worry bags, I don’t think it matters and nobody really gives a scooby-do. UTG!
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Oct 18, 2021 15:16:32 GMT
As you keep saying over and over again. I do quite like the glass half full positive approach Rich but it does feel like you try and ram it down other people’s throats at the expense of everything else at times. It only seems like it. Facts suggest otherwise. Too much emotion and judgement on my posts from some just isn’t helpful. Some over react to far too many posts. I’m just having fun enjoying this moment as we start a run to the play offs. Happy days. Let’s focus on the football. Let's focus on the football says the guy that focussed on the forum poll. Polls are useless says the guy who set one up himself to try and get different results. Gaschat opinions don't matter says the guy who has spent a lot of time pushing your NLP positive attitude content on to users over the last few years. Too much emotion, judgement and overreaction says the guy who grandstanded blocking people and wanted to, in his words, 'police' the forum and purge opinions that weren't in line. It seems to me you're just a politician trying and manipulate the narrative, crying innocence when you get called out for hypocrisy.
|
|