|
Post by wallywalters on Sept 28, 2023 16:43:50 GMT
It also suggests unless Forbes calls the plans in again the revised plans won't need to go before the committee and so are granted to be approved, which won't be the case if they go before the committee. I assume Forbes as basically forced us into agreeing her suggestions re solar panels etc so we can get pp? You got it Topper , all objections will be wiped out with the new application so if the objections have been met, which they appear to have been, the Greens won't be able to call the application in and vote against it. There is a methord in the clubs madness. Edwards won't be happy. This is the green party were talking about here. They will find some new spurious reason to call it in for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 28, 2023 16:55:31 GMT
It also suggests unless Forbes calls the plans in again the revised plans won't need to go before the committee and so are granted to be approved, which won't be the case if they go before the committee. I assume Forbes as basically forced us into agreeing her suggestions re solar panels etc so we can get pp? You got it Topper , all objections will be wiped out with the new application so if the objections have been met, which they appear to have been, the Greens won't be able to call the application in and vote against it. There is a methord in the clubs madness. Edwards won't be happy. Looking at from Forbes POV she's probably got everything she wanted? www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/neighbours-told-bristol-rovers-re-8787562
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 28, 2023 16:57:37 GMT
It's hardly a good advert for the new owners, just sticking two fingers up at the planning laws? Also how would the club get a safety certificate for the new stand to be used? Same as they did on Saturday, when we used two temporary stands which had been erected in a building site?
|
|
|
Post by willytopp84 on Sept 28, 2023 17:16:34 GMT
Has the large erection progressed despite this frustrating set back?
|
|
|
Post by wertongas on Sept 28, 2023 17:16:48 GMT
You got it Topper , all objections will be wiped out with the new application so if the objections have been met, which they appear to have been, the Greens won't be able to call the application in and vote against it. There is a methord in the clubs madness. Edwards won't be happy. This is the green party were talking about here. They will find some new spurious reason to call it in for sure. Councillors cannot use political or spurious reasons to call in an application. Objectors can still send in their objections , but that maybe more difficult if the objectons have all been dealt with. Now the stand is up it is clear that there is no detrimental effect on the neighbourhood from things such as loss of light and loss of trees, and when the back is put on neghbours will notice that sound is retained within the ground . I imagine there will be alot less objections seconed time round.
|
|
|
Post by gashead79 on Sept 28, 2023 17:22:05 GMT
Why did you need to drive for that? Surely this is a telephone or online task? you could only choose your seat by going personally to the club shop on one morning only and at a restricted time. You also had to pay for your chosen seat at the same time. This was back in June If I remember correctly. Crikey. That is ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by wider on Sept 28, 2023 17:37:22 GMT
It's hardly a good advert for the new owners, just sticking two fingers up at the planning laws? Also how would the club get a safety certificate for the new stand to be used? Safety certificate is totally separate from planning
|
|
|
Post by wallywalters on Sept 28, 2023 17:39:31 GMT
This is the green party were talking about here. They will find some new spurious reason to call it in for sure. Councillors cannot use political or spurious reasons to call in an application. Objectors can still send in their objections , but that maybe more difficult if the objectons have all been dealt with. Now the stand is up it is clear that there is no detrimental effect on the neighbourhood from things such as loss of light and loss of trees, and when the back is put on neghbours will notice that sound is retained within the ground . I imagine there will be alot less objections seconed time round. Surely your joking. Councillors have used political reasons and spurious reasons since day dot to stall and hinder planning applications that don't suit their agenda. It won't be that difficult to find the slightest thing the club have missed off the application to call it in again to delay. Youd be extremely naive to think they won't do it again after our history with them and the locals since our tenure at the mem began.
|
|
|
Post by darkbluegas on Sept 28, 2023 17:41:17 GMT
The Director's at Conygar must be Thinking TF we didn't get into bed with this crowd right now
|
|
|
Post by oviedista on Sept 28, 2023 17:56:18 GMT
Councillors cannot use political or spurious reasons to call in an application. Objectors can still send in their objections , but that maybe more difficult if the objectons have all been dealt with. Now the stand is up it is clear that there is no detrimental effect on the neighbourhood from things such as loss of light and loss of trees, and when the back is put on neghbours will notice that sound is retained within the ground . I imagine there will be alot less objections seconed time round. Surely your joking. Councillors have used political reasons and spurious reasons since day dot to stall and hinder planning applications that don't suit their agenda. It won't be that difficult to find the slightest thing the club have missed off the application to call it in again to delay. Youd be extremely naive to think they won't do it again after our history with them and the locals since our tenure at the mem began. What exactly do you imagine this agenda is that means they object in essence to the construction of a semi permanent football stand?
|
|
|
Post by gashead79 on Sept 28, 2023 18:15:50 GMT
The Director's at Conygar must be Thinking TF we didn't get into bed with this crowd right now 🤣 yeah, sure. Like they'd care about our PP. Hand shake would be done by then.
|
|
|
Post by wallywalters on Sept 28, 2023 18:32:21 GMT
Surely your joking. Councillors have used political reasons and spurious reasons since day dot to stall and hinder planning applications that don't suit their agenda. It won't be that difficult to find the slightest thing the club have missed off the application to call it in again to delay. Youd be extremely naive to think they won't do it again after our history with them and the locals since our tenure at the mem began. What exactly do you imagine this agenda is that means they object in essence to the construction of a semi permanent football stand? Try a quick Google search to see who has opposed and funded the last few objections and interjections to us trying to better ourselves at the mem. Youl find a running theme.
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 28, 2023 18:39:08 GMT
Surely your joking. Councillors have used political reasons and spurious reasons since day dot to stall and hinder planning applications that don't suit their agenda. It won't be that difficult to find the slightest thing the club have missed off the application to call it in again to delay. Youd be extremely naive to think they won't do it again after our history with them and the locals since our tenure at the mem began. What exactly do you imagine this agenda is that means they object in essence to the construction of a semi permanent football stand? For the greens any of pure spite, a need to interfere and delay any large projects as it’s in their DNA to do so and a hatred of football and its fans.
|
|
|
Post by oviedista on Sept 28, 2023 18:44:00 GMT
What exactly do you imagine this agenda is that means they object in essence to the construction of a semi permanent football stand? Try a quick Google search to see who has opposed and funded the last few objections and interjections to us trying to better ourselves at the mem. Youl find a running theme. That doesn't answer the question about what the agenda is.
|
|
|
Post by oviedista on Sept 28, 2023 18:53:37 GMT
What exactly do you imagine this agenda is that means they object in essence to the construction of a semi permanent football stand? For the greens any of pure spite, a need to interfere and delay any large projects as it’s in their DNA to do so and a hatred of football and its fans. So not any political agenda as such (there's certainly nothing in the manifesto) - just a set of villainous characteristics and an inherent hatred of football?
|
|
|
Post by wallywalters on Sept 28, 2023 18:55:58 GMT
Try a quick Google search to see who has opposed and funded the last few objections and interjections to us trying to better ourselves at the mem. Youl find a running theme. That doesn't answer the question about what the agenda is. There agenda is anyones guess. They seem to have a need to delay, derail, scupper , argue , and generally stick their noses into anything that amounts to progress for this football club and this city in general. I'm not going to try and justify it anymore as you are clearly dannack or whatever their name was in disguise.
|
|
|
Post by gasonthemount on Sept 28, 2023 19:14:23 GMT
What a complete and utter clusterf*ck. I drove from the Midlands to the club shop to choose and pay for my season ticket seat in the new stand. I chose what I thought would be a central seat but they weren’t sure as they had no detailed plan of the completed stand. I paid up at the discounted early price. We then have the planning issues and the Green obstruction and I now get an eticket to stand on the west terrace. At my age I shouldn’t have to stand for hours and I am not comfortable. Will now be requesting a complete refund. 6 of us (oldest 91) were given the option of either standing or seats. We all opted for seats which were allocated for the first 3 home games in the East Stand. Saturdays game we were in the seating in the SW stand. All of us have been credited £40 each (£10 per game) for the inconvenience we have suffered.
|
|
|
Post by oviedista on Sept 28, 2023 19:19:05 GMT
That doesn't answer the question about what the agenda is. There agenda is anyones guess. They seem to have a need to delay, derail, scupper , argue , and generally stick their noses into anything that amounts to progress for this football club and this city in general. I'm not going to try and justify it anymore as you are clearly dannack or whatever their name was in disguise. Just seems a odd or even paranoid to believe a person or group has an agenda but have no idea what it is. A bit like thinking I'm 'clearly' someone else in disguise.
|
|
|
Post by wertongas on Sept 28, 2023 19:26:31 GMT
You got it Topper , all objections will be wiped out with the new application so if the objections have been met, which they appear to have been, the Greens won't be able to call the application in and vote against it. There is a methord in the clubs madness. Edwards won't be happy. Looking at from Forbes POV she's probably got everything she wanted? www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/neighbours-told-bristol-rovers-re-8787562Edwards , Greens and objectors haven't got what they wanted. The stand has been constructed and when completed the club will be able to apply for a temporary certificate to use it as they have done with the South West corner. Objectors wanted the application to go to committee so they could vote against it and now it may well not. So I would say they have been well and truly sh*f**d
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 28, 2023 19:36:13 GMT
There agenda is anyones guess. They seem to have a need to delay, derail, scupper , argue , and generally stick their noses into anything that amounts to progress for this football club and this city in general. I'm not going to try and justify it anymore as you are clearly dannack or whatever their name was in disguise. Just seems an odd or even paranoid to believe a person or group has an agenda but have no idea what it is. A bit like thinking I'm 'clearly' someone else in disguise. It would be paranoia if there wasn’t previous experience of these people regularly doing their upmost to disrupt and delay progress around Bristol. Trying to understand their motives is a waste of time - like trying to understand why vandals take pleasure in breaking and ruining things.
|
|