|
Post by bathtubpirate on Oct 30, 2023 14:39:33 GMT
UTFG!!
This is amazing news, well done on seeing sense BCC
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Oct 30, 2023 14:44:37 GMT
Rovers v Portsmouth will be a 12k plus sellout ! UTG 😀👍
|
|
|
Post by tommym9 on Oct 30, 2023 14:44:50 GMT
Anyone know why this has gone straight to committee?
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Oct 30, 2023 14:45:47 GMT
Anyone know why this has gone straight to committee? Because we is massive!
|
|
|
Post by bravosierraseven on Oct 30, 2023 14:46:57 GMT
I've noticed a few inaccuracies in Dan Hargreaves reporting of us recently minor things like him saying not sure why players were taken off in match Reports when they were obviously injured and Barton said they were etc etc Nowhere in this article does it say it's being granted. ( it's going to committee where hopefully it will be granted ) Nowhere in the article does it say this from his headline (Granted, based on the current state of the structure, rejection would've led to serious complications.) And finally the article itself although written by Tristan cork is one regurgitated from Hargreaves notes after the interview with the owner Saturday where he clearly said the redevelopment will be 16/17 k not 17/18k as the article suggests. Tristan Cork does like to sensationalise things. It seemed like his regurgitated article this morning was a deliberate ploy to stir up the local residents.
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Oct 30, 2023 14:58:54 GMT
So I don't need to write in? Yes. Please do. Try to be positive. Your comments, even now, can and will be included in the report that is put forward. Don't assume you are wasting your time. You will notice that the anti-stadium lobby will be looking for ways to stop this. Additionally we need to start a new thread to remind forum users to write to councillors once the details will be released. Interesting it's Richard Eddy as he's in group A. We need to continue to do both. Write in letters of support and contact members directly who sit on this committee.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2023 14:59:34 GMT
I've noticed a few inaccuracies in Dan Hargreaves reporting of us recently minor things like him saying not sure why players were taken off in match Reports when they were obviously injured and Barton said they were etc etc Nowhere in this article does it say it's being granted. ( it's going to committee where hopefully it will be granted ) Nowhere in the article does it say this from his headline (Granted, based on the current state of the structure, rejection would've led to serious complications.) And finally the article itself although written by Tristan cork is one regurgitated from Hargreaves notes after the interview with the owner Saturday where he clearly said the redevelopment will be 16/17 k not 17/18k as the article suggests. That’s all well and good but what about Hargraves?
|
|
|
Post by wallywalters on Oct 30, 2023 15:02:45 GMT
I've noticed a few inaccuracies in Dan Hargreaves reporting of us recently minor things like him saying not sure why players were taken off in match Reports when they were obviously injured and Barton said they were etc etc Nowhere in this article does it say it's being granted. ( it's going to committee where hopefully it will be granted ) Nowhere in the article does it say this from his headline (Granted, based on the current state of the structure, rejection would've led to serious complications.) And finally the article itself although written by Tristan cork is one regurgitated from Hargreaves notes after the interview with the owner Saturday where he clearly said the redevelopment will be 16/17 k not 17/18k as the article suggests. That’s all well and good but what about Hargraves? If he's not going to report accurately I'm not going to spell his name right 😃
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Oct 30, 2023 15:02:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Oct 30, 2023 15:06:39 GMT
Anyone know why this has gone straight to committee? Why not?. The first application went in mid February ( 9 months wait ). It needs to go to a political vote and even then it could be refused and at best not ready until early next year. Therefore the process could take nearly a year from start to finish which is too long .
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Oct 30, 2023 15:06:57 GMT
Anyone know why this has gone straight to committee? Because the greens have not called it in?
|
|
|
Post by tommym9 on Oct 30, 2023 15:25:03 GMT
Anyone know why this has gone straight to committee? Why not?. The first application went in mid February ( 9 months wait ). It needs to go to a political vote and even then it could be refused and at best not ready until early next year. Therefore the process could take nearly a year from start to finish which is too long . Why does it need to go to a political vote?
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Oct 30, 2023 15:25:30 GMT
I've noticed a few inaccuracies in Dan Hargreaves reporting of us recently minor things like him saying not sure why players were taken off in match Reports when they were obviously injured and Barton said they were etc etc Nowhere in this article does it say it's being granted. ( it's going to committee where hopefully it will be granted ) Nowhere in the article does it say this from his headline (Granted, based on the current state of the structure, rejection would've led to serious complications.) And finally the article itself although written by Tristan cork is one regurgitated from Hargreaves notes after the interview with the owner Saturday where he clearly said the redevelopment will be 16/17 k not 17/18k as the article suggests. We've come to accept inaccuracies over the years from various reporters.
I won't be opening the champagne just yet.
There are a minority of cases where councillors overturn the advice of officers. I don't think it will be the case with the make up of this committee, but if the officer's recommendations are ignored by the committee, they need to be on pretty solid grounds. "Councillors should be ready to explain why they have not accepted the officer’s recommendation and that officers should be given an opportunity to explain such a decision’s implications, including those for any appeal and award of costs."
Knowing our history in the planning arena, there may be twists and turns yet to come.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Oct 30, 2023 15:27:57 GMT
Why not?. The first application went in mid February ( 9 months wait ). It needs to go to a political vote and even then it could be refused and at best not ready until early next year. Therefore the process could take nearly a year from start to finish which is too long . Why does it need to go to a political vote? Whilst minor planning decisions are completely delegated to officers, larger or more controversial developments need to go to committee for a decision.
|
|
|
Post by tommym9 on Oct 30, 2023 15:30:32 GMT
Why does it need to go to a political vote? Whilst minor planning decisions are completely delegated to officers, larger or more controversial developments need to go to committee for a decision. So.... When councillor Edwards got pilloried on here for calling it in.... Like she said at the time it was always likely to go to committee due to the number of objections/comments of support
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Oct 30, 2023 15:31:48 GMT
Why not?. The first application went in mid February ( 9 months wait ). It needs to go to a political vote and even then it could be refused and at best not ready until early next year. Therefore the process could take nearly a year from start to finish which is too long . Why does it need to go to a political vote? Because committee is made up of political parties . And I'm sad to say I have NO faith in one particular party in voting to support us. Therefore: I urge people which I will to target Labour & Tories councillors to get this over the line. I do have good knowledge in local politics !.
|
|
|
Post by bluesky on Oct 30, 2023 15:34:17 GMT
So do you think the local would prefer this?
Maybe get IKEA to sponcer the stand.
|
|
|
Post by oldmarket65 on Oct 30, 2023 15:35:54 GMT
I won't be drawn in by the games the Green supporters are playing - it's mind games !. Be positive and ask for the support of Labour & Tory councillors.
A list will come out next week and we need to ask both groups to continue to support us and thank them. Be positive don't get side tracked by games!.
|
|
|
Post by tommym9 on Oct 30, 2023 15:37:36 GMT
Why does it need to go to a political vote? Because committee is made up of political parties . And I'm sad to say I have NO faith in one particular party in voting to support us. Therefore: I urge people which I will to target Labour & Tories councillors to get this over the line. I do have good knowledge in local politics !. I think you've mis understood my question. I was wondering why this went straight to committee, rather than being called in like thr last one. You in particular were very angry at councillor Edwards for calling it in, but now are insisting it goes to committee. P.s I know I'm being a sh** stirring git so feel free to tell me to f**k off 👍
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on Oct 30, 2023 15:43:44 GMT
Because committee is made up of political parties . And I'm sad to say I have NO faith in one particular party in voting to support us. Therefore: I urge people which I will to target Labour & Tories councillors to get this over the line. I do have good knowledge in local politics !. I think you've mis understood my question. I was wondering why this went straight to committee, rather than being called in like thr last one. You in particular were very angry at councillor Edwards for calling it in, but now are insisting it goes to committee. P.s I know I'm being a sh** stirring git so feel free to tell me to f**k off 👍 Can I do it?
|
|