|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 12:26:15 GMT
I did about 200 pages back! To be fair to Gasincider there does seem so truth in the previous suggestions by him that Ged McCrory was interested in mounting a takeover, as such, I don't want to just dismiss the rumour, particularly as NH has never really denied it plus CS has joined the BoD for some reason. Although the rumour could all be a smoke screen to cover up Plan B, a reduced capacity UWE only, at best, part owned by Rovers once the Mem beens sold to pay off the loans/debts. What you're saying doesn't make any sense. Nick Higgs and the Board have to address a rumour promulgated by someone who won't even say where they allegedly saw the information on twitter. If you want to find out where GasinCider got his twitter info from you can easily find out for yourself. Go to twitter and type in the search box "Bristol Rovers Consortium" and look at the results - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Takeover" (if you want to be really thorough try "Take over" as two words too). - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Investor" - guess what you get? Nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff Do the same for "Bristol Rovers Investment", "Bristol Rovers £40m", "Bristol Rovers £40,000,000" "Bristol Rovers 40 million" "Bristol Rovers forty million". You can even go all out and just do "Bristol Rovers" and trawl all the way back through August and September. Can you see where I'm going with this? GasinCider's twitter source is a figment of his imagination. Are you saying Gasincider is nuts? Well I don't have a problem with that, it sure as hell helps when you're a regular poster on here. |
|
|
|
Post by dinsdale on Nov 20, 2015 12:31:06 GMT
I still believe in the consortium but there is so much to clear up before and sale starting with the legal issue of the mem to be resolved and then the issue of financing the huge funding gap for UWE.
This may take some time
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2015 12:38:04 GMT
I still believe in the consortium but there is so much to clear up before and sale starting with the legal issue of the mem to be resolved and then the issue of financing the huge funding gap for UWE. This may take some time but....but.....but we were told two or three days tops ! |
|
|
|
Post by LJG on Nov 20, 2015 12:40:51 GMT
What you're saying doesn't make any sense. Nick Higgs and the Board have to address a rumour promulgated by someone who won't even say where they allegedly saw the information on twitter. If you want to find out where GasinCider got his twitter info from you can easily find out for yourself. Go to twitter and type in the search box "Bristol Rovers Consortium" and look at the results - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Takeover" (if you want to be really thorough try "Take over" as two words too). - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Investor" - guess what you get? Nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff Do the same for "Bristol Rovers Investment", "Bristol Rovers £40m", "Bristol Rovers £40,000,000" "Bristol Rovers 40 million" "Bristol Rovers forty million". You can even go all out and just do "Bristol Rovers" and trawl all the way back through August and September. Can you see where I'm going with this? GasinCider's twitter source is a figment of his imagination. The board only need to fully deny it if it's damaging the club or if asked at the AGM surely? Other than that there is no need I guess. NH already has already said he doesn't know of a consortium - what more do you want? I honestly can not comprehend why the direction of questioning is being turned towards the subject of a rumour when the source of the rumour on this forum has conclusively been proved to be a liar. |
|
|
|
Post by LJG on Nov 20, 2015 12:42:25 GMT
What you're saying doesn't make any sense. Nick Higgs and the Board have to address a rumour promulgated by someone who won't even say where they allegedly saw the information on twitter. If you want to find out where GasinCider got his twitter info from you can easily find out for yourself. Go to twitter and type in the search box "Bristol Rovers Consortium" and look at the results - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Takeover" (if you want to be really thorough try "Take over" as two words too). - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Investor" - guess what you get? Nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff Do the same for "Bristol Rovers Investment", "Bristol Rovers £40m", "Bristol Rovers £40,000,000" "Bristol Rovers 40 million" "Bristol Rovers forty million". You can even go all out and just do "Bristol Rovers" and trawl all the way back through August and September. Can you see where I'm going with this? GasinCider's twitter source is a figment of his imagination. Are you saying Gasincider is nuts? Well I don't have a problem with that, it sure as hell helps when you're a regular poster on here. I'm saying that I've proved wholesale and without reservation that what he has said throughout several hundred pages on this thread is untrue. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Nov 20, 2015 12:44:25 GMT
The board only need to fully deny it if it's damaging the club or if asked at the AGM surely? Other than that there is no need I guess. NH already has already said he doesn't know of a consortium - what more do you want? I honestly can not comprehend why the direction of questioning is being turned towards the subject of a rumour when the source of the rumour on this forum has conclusively been proved to be a liar. Ok. Well done. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 12:44:53 GMT
The board only need to fully deny it if it's damaging the club or if asked at the AGM surely? Other than that there is no need I guess. NH already has already said he doesn't know of a consortium - what more do you want? I honestly can not comprehend why the direction of questioning is being turned towards the subject of a rumour when the source of the rumour on this forum has conclusively been proved to be a liar. I wouldn't worry about then if I were you. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 12:45:56 GMT
Are you saying Gasincider is nuts? Well I don't have a problem with that, it sure as hell helps when you're a regular poster on here. I'm saying that I've proved wholesale and without reservation that what he has said throughout several hundred pages on this thread is untrue. Great. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2015 13:06:10 GMT
Are you saying Gasincider is nuts? Well I don't have a problem with that, it sure as hell helps when you're a regular poster on here. I'm saying that I've proved wholesale and without reservation that what he has said throughout several hundred pages on this thread is untrue. What about JTS' tweet made just before this thread was started? Which I recall is mentioned, possibly by me, in one of the earlier posts on this thread? see @ffsclub on the 18 Sept |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2015 13:07:28 GMT
The board only need to fully deny it if it's damaging the club or if asked at the AGM surely? Other than that there is no need I guess. NH already has already said he doesn't know of a consortium - what more do you want? I honestly can not comprehend why the direction of questioning is being turned towards the subject of a rumour when the source of the rumour on this forum has conclusively been proved to be a liar. But he hasn't what he said was he'd like to know who the so called consortium are, not they don't exist. Read what you will into that comment. Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 20, 2015 13:09:26 GMT
The board only need to fully deny it if it's damaging the club or if asked at the AGM surely? Other than that there is no need I guess. NH already has already said he doesn't know of a consortium - what more do you want? I honestly can not comprehend why the direction of questioning is being turned towards the subject of a rumour when the source of the rumour on this forum has conclusively been proved to be a liar. Assuming you accept JTS' tweet for the FFS exists then he hasn't been proved a liar? Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
Post by Squiffy on Nov 20, 2015 13:27:13 GMT
Everyone got their Euromillions tickets for tonight's draw?......not sure "she who casts no shadow" would look upon putting money into The Gas as a sound investment, but if I tell her it's a property deal.....
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 13:32:24 GMT
Everyone got their Euromillions tickets for tonight's draw?......not sure "she who casts no shadow" would look upon putting money into The Gas as a sound investment, but if I tell her it's a property deal..... Tell her when she's just dived off the stern of your 40 metre Sunseeker in the Med, she won't care. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2015 13:33:58 GMT
Everyone got their Euromillions tickets for tonight's draw?......not sure "she who casts no shadow" would look upon putting money into The Gas as a sound investment, but if I tell her it's a property deal..... Tell her when she's just dived off the stern of your 40 metre Sunseeker in the Med, she won't care. Will that be before or after he opens up the throttle on the engines ? |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 13:39:46 GMT
Tell her when she's just dived off the stern of your 40 metre Sunseeker in the Med, she won't care. Will that be before or after he opens up the throttle on the engines ? That's down to Squiffy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2015 13:42:22 GMT
Will that be before or after he opens up the throttle on the engines ? That's down to Squiffy. Well, if my missus jumped off the back of my 40 metre Sunseeker in the Med, there'd be a Tsunami warning issued ! |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 20, 2015 13:52:24 GMT
Well, if my missus jumped off the back of my 40 metre Sunseeker in the Med, there'd be a Tsunami warning issued ! Because of the engines on full throttle to get away, or the wake? |
|
|
|
Post by eastville1966 on Nov 20, 2015 14:45:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Jock on Nov 20, 2015 14:50:16 GMT
I did about 200 pages back! To be fair to Gasincider there does seem so truth in the previous suggestions by him that Ged McCrory was interested in mounting a takeover, as such, I don't want to just dismiss the rumour, particularly as NH has never really denied it plus CS has joined the BoD for some reason. Although the rumour could all be a smoke screen to cover up Plan B, a reduced capacity UWE only, at best, part owned by Rovers once the Mem beens sold to pay off the loans/debts. What you're saying doesn't make any sense. Nick Higgs and the Board have to address a rumour promulgated by someone who won't even say where they allegedly saw the information on twitter. If you want to find out where GasinCider got his twitter info from you can easily find out for yourself. Go to twitter and type in the search box "Bristol Rovers Consortium" and look at the results - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Takeover" (if you want to be really thorough try "Take over" as two words too). - nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff in June. Try "Bristol Rovers Investor" - guess what you get? Nothing before September 18th this year apart from the Chris Samuelson stuff Do the same for "Bristol Rovers Investment", "Bristol Rovers £40m", "Bristol Rovers £40,000,000" "Bristol Rovers 40 million" "Bristol Rovers forty million". You can even go all out and just do "Bristol Rovers" and trawl all the way back through August and September. Can you see where I'm going with this? GasinCider's twitter source is a figment of his imagination. Holy feck!!! yous really needz tae get oot more pal |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Nov 20, 2015 14:51:10 GMT
|
|
