|
|
Post by allgasandgaiters on Jan 25, 2016 19:25:10 GMT
Steven Avery is part of the consortium? Could have been. He talks funny and nearly had 36 million dollars!! Careful you guys - Making a Murderer is straying WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY off topic, and I'm sure Lord Sugar is soddin' watching this and waiting to lock it down (which would be a shame after 267 pages)  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 19:30:47 GMT
Could have been. He talks funny and nearly had 36 million dollars!! Careful you guys - Making a Murderer is straying WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY off topic, and I'm sure Lord Sugar is soddin' watching this and waiting to lock it down (which would be a shame after 267 pages) He wouldn't dare shut it down. If he does, it'll be the last time I buy an Amstrad computer! |
|
|
|
Post by giff on Jan 25, 2016 19:39:37 GMT
Is anyone from the Forum attending the court ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Jan 25, 2016 20:15:53 GMT
Is anyone from the Forum attending the court ? Sorry, giving it a miss on this occasion. |
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Jan 25, 2016 20:21:44 GMT
I have speculated on a number of occasions that TRASH never had the funds to pursue that ridiculous JR. Sainsburys, just like every other big business will have a slush fund from where sums of money can be fed to organisations that have the ability to assist them in business. i reckon Sainsburys fund d TRASH on the quiet. Hopefully someone on our side has found a smoking gun that links them to the JR. Perhaps that Scrafton Bitch has been leaned on and come clean. Perhaps that awful Raddice woman has a conscience and decided to tell all. Only time will tell. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 25, 2016 20:22:47 GMT
Maybe that's why we appear to be so confident against all the odds, although you have to ask why this wasn't presented during the original case. What if Rovers have discovered that it was Sainsbury's that actually bankrolled the Judical Review (TRASH).....just saying. Ah, Topper beat me to it. Darn those pesky kids! I didn't go that far just in case.... |
|
|
|
Post by chippenhamgas on Jan 25, 2016 20:25:13 GMT
I have speculated on a number of occasions that TRASH never had the funds to pursue that ridiculous JR. Sainsburys, just like every other big business will have a slush fund from where sums of money can be fed to organisations that have the ability to assist them in business. i reckon Sainsburys fund d TRASH on the quiet. Hopefully someone on our side has found a smoking gun that links them to the JR. Perhaps that Scrafton Bitch has been leaned on and come clean. Perhaps that awful Raddice woman has a conscience and decided to tell all. Only time will tell. This may be about to get interesting, hopefully someone will be able to keep us updated. |
|
|
|
Post by northsidegas on Jan 25, 2016 21:03:39 GMT
new evidence? who funded trash maybe? said this back in october?? |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 25, 2016 21:04:35 GMT
Wasn't it BillyGas who use to pop along in his lunch breaks and supply us with up dates from the trial?
|
|
|
|
Post by chippenhamgas on Jan 25, 2016 21:34:38 GMT
new evidence? who funded trash maybe? said this back in october?? Thought this was far fetched nonsense but now i'm not so sure, would have to be something big for the judges to allow it to be considered at this stage. |
|
|
|
Post by northsidegas on Jan 25, 2016 21:42:15 GMT
exactly my thoughts bound to be positive evidence, like you said things might start getting interesting fingers and toes crossed!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 21:46:10 GMT
I went for a walk in the field at UWE earlier and a newt with black spots ran over my foot.
How strange. It looked pretty rare.
Is that a good or bad thing?
|
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 25, 2016 21:50:11 GMT
Not even sure who is the defendant anymore. I believe it started out as us, but since we are appealing, does it still remain so, or are they now the defendant?
If so could it be they will raise the matter of the house on Filton Avenue that has just been bought by Eddie Ware, which I seem to think we said we already owned at the time of the original contract. If so, won't that make the whole contract null and void?
Any legal experts out there?
|
|
|
|
Post by peterpirate on Jan 25, 2016 21:54:14 GMT
Is anyone from the Forum attending the court ? Sorry, giving it a miss on this occasion. i am:) just packing my bag now |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 22:03:01 GMT
Not even sure who is the defendant anymore. I believe it started out as us, but since we are appealing, does it still remain so, or are they now the defendant? If so could it be they will raise the matter of the house on Filton Avenue that has just been bought by Eddie Ware, which I seem to think we said we already owned at the time of the original contract. If so, won't that make the whole contract null and void? Any legal experts out there? That's nice. If the Sainsbury's legal didn't know about that, they probably do now. Well done. |
|
|
|
Post by northsidegas on Jan 25, 2016 22:03:04 GMT
Not even sure who is the defendant anymore. I believe it started out as us, but since we are appealing, does it still remain so, or are they now the defendant? If so could it be they will raise the matter of the house on Filton Avenue that has just been bought by Eddie Ware, which I seem to think we said we already owned at the time of the original contract. If so, won't that make the whole contract null and void? Any legal experts out there? Appeal of Defendant from the order of Mrs Justice Proudman, dated 31st July 2015, filed 14th August 2015. |
|
|
|
Post by northsidegas on Jan 25, 2016 22:04:04 GMT
were the defendant
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 22:06:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 25, 2016 22:14:28 GMT
Not even sure who is the defendant anymore. I believe it started out as us, but since we are appealing, does it still remain so, or are they now the defendant? If so could it be they will raise the matter of the house on Filton Avenue that has just been bought by Eddie Ware, which I seem to think we said we already owned at the time of the original contract. If so, won't that make the whole contract null and void? Any legal experts out there? The rumour I've heard is there is no consortium and NH wants Sainsbury's to admit in court they were behind the whole "New beginning" just thread to try and discredit his UWE plans, it could be an interesting day in court tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jan 25, 2016 22:40:21 GMT
That's nice. If the Sainsbury's legal didn't know about that, they probably do now. Well done. Keep up Nobby. This was mentioned on the other forum about two months ago, and was commented on, on this thread at the same time. But probably not best to raise it again today? |
|
