|
Post by kruger on Jan 6, 2016 22:56:49 GMT
They have to talk about us as they don't have much else to talk about eccept relegation
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Jan 6, 2016 23:01:14 GMT
Allen's interview yesterday... “Now we play our rivals Bristol Rovers. “We’ve got a very good home record, they’ve got a good away record, and there’s rivalry between the two clubs. “So we’re all looking forward to a great occasion on Saturday afternoon.” But yes, fao: OTIB we'll have at least 30k there on Saturday. That's slightly embarrassing. Can't wait for him to praise our 15,000 fans after the game, he always seems too. I'm amazed it hasn't been deleted? It honestly wouldn't surprise me if they all thought it was a serious post! Hence why it's still there. They're usually quick enough to delete anything embarrassing. Of course I'm serious , we've already sold over a 1,000 and we should sell at least 1k a day on general release up until next week. If anything I've under-estimated. what's the capacity again 13k ?
|
|
|
Post by gheadray on Jan 6, 2016 23:15:28 GMT
Are you counting the Gasheads locked out as well !
|
|
|
Post by gheadray on Jan 6, 2016 23:18:11 GMT
Just escaped the lovely village where people talk to spend 6 hours stuck on the M5 I will try to up the anti UTG
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Jan 7, 2016 3:08:32 GMT
They are so Dam thick it's unbelievable. The majority seem to think there's actually some substance in the "15,000" post. Someone else has said that we could only muster 150 at Bradford a few seasons back when we were in a very late push for the playoffs. Pretty sure they had a pitiful following to Bradford away themselves last year despite it being the night they won the league.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Jayho on Jan 7, 2016 3:20:41 GMT
They are so f**king thick it's unbelievable. The majority seem to think there's actually some substance in the "15,000" post. Someone else has said that we could only muster 150 at Bradford a few seasons back when we were in a very late push for the playoffs. Pretty sure they had a pitiful following to Bradford away themselves last year despite it being the night they won the league. The away following argument is clearly a good angle as it seems to wind them up pretty easily.
|
|
|
Post by Briz Red on Jan 7, 2016 4:22:09 GMT
I can see us taking 15,000 to this game Hahahahaha. This is amazing. ![](http://i.imgur.com/aMUBU71.png) I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..'
|
|
|
Post by Captain Jayho on Jan 7, 2016 4:36:46 GMT
Hahahahaha. This is amazing. ![](http://i.imgur.com/aMUBU71.png) I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..' "Probably" lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2016 7:30:28 GMT
They're more thick than I remember. The fact they are pretty much all in agreement that it was a serious comment makes it worse.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jan 7, 2016 8:16:28 GMT
Hahahahaha. This is amazing. ![](http://i.imgur.com/aMUBU71.png) I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..' I see you omitted to mention all the OTIB posters who ignored that bit. Honestly, if you're gonna play the forum police of truthiness, why don't you go to otib and put right all the witless idiots in that thread?
|
|
|
Post by mariobalotelli on Jan 7, 2016 9:18:54 GMT
Hahahahaha. This is amazing. ![](http://i.imgur.com/aMUBU71.png) I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is ' probably tongue in cheek..'
|
|
|
Post by simon1883 on Jan 7, 2016 9:40:13 GMT
My sauces from close to the Kassam Stadium are telling me that OUFC have now seen this thread and have officially offered Rovers the home section of the stadium and the home fans will be moved to the away end.
#OUFCvsBRFC
Note: may note be 100% accurate.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jan 7, 2016 9:50:45 GMT
My sauces from close to the Kassam Stadium are telling me that OUFC have now seen this thread and have officially offered Rovers the home section of the stadium and the home fans will be moved to the away end. #OUFCvsBRFC Note: may note be 100% accurate. Actually, their forum has a lot of whining about them giving us too many tickets and us taking up too much of their stand. Maybe they should have a word with the Barnet forum.
|
|
|
Post by nolongernonleaguegas on Jan 7, 2016 9:53:08 GMT
2,100 is still a decent sized allocation... Portsmouth had 2,500 though so they might give us a few more when we sell out
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jan 7, 2016 18:41:31 GMT
I'm pretty sure they can give us more? Didn't we take 3,000 under JW? I'm even sure they've given teams more than that before!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2016 18:43:58 GMT
Hahahahaha. This is amazing. ![](http://i.imgur.com/aMUBU71.png) I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..' Would imagine it's difficult to include part of a post which is edited on later once the poster ashamedly realises what they're doing with their life
|
|
|
Post by nolongernonleaguegas on Jan 7, 2016 19:08:16 GMT
I'm pretty sure they can give us more? Didn't we take 3,000 under JW? I'm even sure they've given teams more than that before! Nah it was 2,000
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Jan 7, 2016 23:56:08 GMT
I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..' I see you omitted to mention all the OTIB posters who ignored that bit. Honestly, if you're gonna play the forum police of truthiness, why don't you go to otib and put right all the witless idiots in that thread? A simple f*ck off would have done. That said, I've just looked at the otib thread........what a larrrfffff!
|
|
|
Post by Briz Red on Jan 8, 2016 22:59:10 GMT
I see you omitted to include the bit of the same post which said the post on Gas Chat is 'probably tongue in cheek..' Would imagine it's difficult to include part of a post which is edited on later once the poster ashamedly realises what they're doing with their life Nope, it's clear that the post was edited just two minutes after it was originally posted. It looks like this was done to highlight that the link didn't work. Then the carefully condensed version was quoted on here an hour later, very selective....to suit an agenda
|
|
|
Post by mariobalotelli on Jan 8, 2016 23:26:27 GMT
Would imagine it's difficult to include part of a post which is edited on later once the poster ashamedly realises what they're doing with their life Nope, it's clear that the post was edited just two minutes after it was originally posted. It looks like this was done to highlight that the link didn't work. Then the carefully condensed version was quoted on here an hour later, very selective....to suit an agenda You can hop off back to your own forum if you don't like it.
|
|