Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 15:13:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cookinongas on Aug 21, 2014 17:05:00 GMT
Why was this never acted upon or implimented?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 17:23:17 GMT
The people who introduced it were a splinter group. The BoD managed to keep hold of the reigns and the founders of the rafc were outcast.
Happy to be corrected.
The 3/4 in the group are well known supporters/ex directors.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 17:31:15 GMT
I recall Geoff Dunford describing the plan as "Fatally flawed."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 17:47:04 GMT
It's a shame, it appears the board members with the vision were the ones with the least clout,and the ones with the least vision had the most
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Aug 21, 2014 18:19:42 GMT
The agenda for change, if it was adopted, stood a good chance of making the Club fit for purpose. Instead we have plunged into a new dark age. Why is Higgs so scared of Spencer and Co? Well worth reading through especially the benefits to Supporters.
|
|
|
Post by I Voted For Kodos on Aug 21, 2014 18:20:57 GMT
I guess the agenda for change looked misplaced when we got promoted that same season. The stay in league 1 papered over the cracks.
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 21, 2014 18:34:40 GMT
I guess the agenda for change looked misplaced when we got promoted that same season. The stay in league 1 papered over the cracks. Indeed, particularly when we had the best player in the League carrying us. It was no surprise that we were relegated the season after Rickie was sold.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 18:53:51 GMT
Why was this never acted upon or implimented? Geoff Dunford and Ron Craig owned over 50% and despite the tradition of one man one vote blocked loads of changes hence four directors and the fantastic chair of the supporters club standing down. To implement the agenda following this would be to admit they were wrong. The guy that said we were promoted the same season was it not the following season onve Rom Craig had taken over. With a luck and chemistry approach is always a chance of short term success but long term no way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 18:55:58 GMT
The agenda for change, if it was adopted, stood a good chance of making the Club fit for purpose. Instead we have plunged into a new dark age. Why is Higgs so scared of Spencer and Co? Well worth reading through especially the benefits to Supporters. Kevin Spencer was brilliant with the fans and never did anything wrong other then along with the majority of the board had a different vision.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 18:57:01 GMT
I recall Geoff Dunford describing the plan as "Fatally flawed." I remember describing GD as a control freak
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 19:05:18 GMT
The people who introduced it were a splinter group. The BoD managed to keep hold of the reigns and the founders of the rafc were outcast. Happy to be corrected. The 3/4 in the group are well known supporters/ex directors. No in my recollection They were directors x4 plus members of the supporters club that all resigned due to the way GD was running the club in an undemocratic way. Following them leaving they Publically released an alternative vision for how the club could work. They have alway left this plan open for others to take forward. I made thousands of leaflets About it along with others and got loads of abuse as well support for doing it. Most of the abuse came from Brsc volunteers. Never forgave them for that or for not backing the scheme the proteata against GF. The Chairman of brsc actually had some integrity and resigned. Brian Seymour Smiths equivilant resigned too thats how big an issue GDs behaviour was.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 19:14:22 GMT
The people who introduced it were a splinter group. The BoD managed to keep hold of the reigns and the founders of the rafc were outcast. Happy to be corrected. The 3/4 in the group are well known supporters/ex directors. No in my recollection They were directors x4 plus members of the supporters club that all resigned due to the way GD was running the club in an undemocratic way. Following them leaving they Publically released an alternative vision for how the club could work. They have alway left this plan open for others to take forward. I made thousands of leaflets About it along with others and got loads of abuse as well support for doing it. Most of the abuse came from Brsc volunteers. Never forgave them for that or for not backing the scheme the proteata against GF. The Chairman of brsc actually had some integrity and resigned. Brian Seymour Smiths equivilant resigned too thats how big an issue GDs behaviour was. Cheers Dins. I remember signing up to the AF at the time also.
|
|
|
Post by I Voted For Kodos on Aug 21, 2014 19:19:33 GMT
The guy that said we were promoted the same season was it not the following season onve Rom Craig had taken over. With a luck and chemistry approach is always a chance of short term success but long term no way. Well the Agenda is from November 2006, which we started in 17th position in league 2. From there we only improved that season.
|
|
|
Post by orgasmic on Aug 21, 2014 19:23:52 GMT
IMO the rafc is a poorly thought out document that needed far more research and detail if it was to be taken seriously. It had some good ideas but that's about it. If I were to present an equivalent document to the board of the company I work for I would be laughed out the room.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 19:46:03 GMT
The guy that said we were promoted the same season was it not the following season onve Rom Craig had taken over. With a luck and chemistry approach is always a chance of short term success but long term no way. Well the Agenda is from November 2006, which we started in 17th position in league 2. From there we only improved that season. Sorry it was a question rather then a statement. I remember the club being at a huge low point and everyone getting behind it then we won a couple of games and most fans just went meh !!!
|
|
|
Post by mjhgas on Aug 21, 2014 19:48:14 GMT
IMO the rafc is a poorly thought out document that needed far more research and detail if it was to be taken seriously. It had some good ideas but that's about it. If I were to present an equivalent document to the board of the company I work for I would be laughed out the room. Yes, but it's a starting point and a lot more than the fag packet that NH works from at present!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 19:49:37 GMT
IMO the rafc is a poorly thought out document that needed far more research and detail if it was to be taken seriously. It had some good ideas but that's about it. If I were to present an equivalent document to the board of the company I work for I would be laughed out the room. Yes, but it's a starting point and a lot more than the fag packet that NH works from at present! Agreed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 21:49:11 GMT
IMO the rafc is a poorly thought out document that needed far more research and detail if it was to be taken seriously. It had some good ideas but that's about it. If I were to present an equivalent document to the board of the company I work for I would be laughed out the room. Do you work for a company as poorly run as BRFC?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 22, 2014 0:16:02 GMT
I read it. I don't know anything other than what it says. To me its basically a well written and well intentioned article which has some very nice ideas but clearly written without any insider input. I might be wrong but that's how it seems. Pie in the sky really given that implementing any of it is wholly reliant on understanding the current structure especially financially.
And before any of you start jumping on my back, I'm not being sarcastic or smug about it. Apart from that diagram. That diagram is sh*t.
|
|