Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2016 15:15:57 GMT
Good luck to Sgt Al Blackman today. I hope he gets home before Xmas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2016 16:39:09 GMT
The case has been adjourned till Wednesday.
A Royal Marine who was jailed for the murder of an Afghan fighter has had his bail hearing postponed.
Alexander Blackman was due to hear today whether he will be released ahead of an appeal against his conviction.
But judges chose to postpone their decision until Wednesday.
Blackman's wife Claire left court to applause and cheers of "stay strong".
"Gasps in court as decision read out. He'll spend another anniversary in Prison but could be home for Xmas "
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2017 12:57:02 GMT
Hopefully, he'll be free today. After the events on Wednesday it really is a bit fecked up that we have a Royal Marines Sgt in prison for killing a terrorist.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Mar 25, 2017 17:34:03 GMT
This guy is a true hero, over 30 enemy stopped, and after all the prison sh**(shame on the government and judges) , he was asked if he wanted to resume his carear on his relese, his reply was yes. Now that is a true hero , f**ked over by the system he worked for , and still wants to serve
|
|
|
Post by jaggas on Mar 25, 2017 20:12:34 GMT
Dont hold your breath the Loony Left control everything in this country.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 28, 2017 10:14:30 GMT
Reduced to 7 years which means he could be out in a few weeks after completing a 50% / 3.5 year term. Previously it was a minimum 8 years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 11:00:52 GMT
Now let's hope they sort out the difference between civil and military law. For those unaware, they are different. He was convicted on a 5-2 split vote. That would not be enough to convict in a civil court......also note seven, not a jury of twelve. Probably the only court case where those finding him guilty stood and saluted the defendant.
He should never have been charged.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 28, 2017 11:12:30 GMT
His QC was on BBC earlier, he apparently has been doing an OU degree and teaching maths to the other inmates. His wife needs a lot of praise too for her determination. Hope they can get back to some normality, if that is possible under the circumstances.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 11:23:39 GMT
I have never met him, but I know some that have. The message I get is that he is a top top bloke. I imagine he will have no problems getting a job. There are many many employers who will be queuing up to offer him a job.
|
|
|
Marine A
Mar 28, 2017 11:31:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by Russgas on Mar 28, 2017 11:31:46 GMT
I watched a documentary a few months back on the war against the taliban and was amazed they are not allowed to engage with the enemy unless they come under fire first. Who makes this crazy stuff up and why ?
|
|
|
Marine A
Mar 28, 2017 12:01:55 GMT
via mobile
Post by baggins on Mar 28, 2017 12:01:55 GMT
I watched a documentary a few months back on the war against the taliban and was amazed they are not allowed to engage with the enemy unless they come under fire first. Who makes this crazy stuff up and why ? Lawyers and money.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 28, 2017 12:05:47 GMT
I watched a documentary a few months back on the war against the taliban and was amazed they are not allowed to engage with the enemy unless they come under fire first. Who makes this crazy stuff up and why ? Several reasons, partly to do with winning hearts and minds and therefore not to get the locals turning against you. In a country where guns are common place just carrying an AK would not necessarily mean they are the enemy. Killing someone on a whim would turn the undecideds to the enemy and be counter productive (see Vietnam). It also (theoretically) places forces under the civil law which as this was a counter insurgency mission rather than a state on state war was necessary for the above too.
There are a few ex forces on here who may be able to expand as they may be more familiar with the rules in Northern Ireland where a "Yellow Card" of dos and don'ts was issued.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Mar 29, 2017 9:20:00 GMT
Good news , however his conviction should be quashed, he should be released immediately not in a few weeks. Law system in this countrty makes me fooking sick ,you can rape women and kids and walk free, you can beat a woman with a cricket bat and make her drink bleach and fuc king walk. However fight for Queen and country, put someone out of their misery and get locked up make me sick to the core ,should round up all the politicans , judges , soliciters etc , send em on a 3 month tour of the front line and see if they change thier minds
|
|
|
Post by inee on Mar 29, 2017 9:31:32 GMT
I watched a documentary a few months back on the war against the taliban and was amazed they are not allowed to engage with the enemy unless they come under fire first. Who makes this crazy stuff up and why ? As stu said hearts and minds , if an enemy doesnt play by the geneva convention then we shouldn't either, thing is the media are in war zones and focus on when we do something wrong, so we have to be whiter than white. These days it's supposed to be favorable to injure rather than kill the reasoning is thus , if you kill an enemy thats it ,if you wound an enemy in theory it remove 3 or 4 people fron the fight , as they tend the wounded , in the conflics of late the enemy dont give a stuff about thier wounded so it would be more beneficial to have an stck policy as if you drop enough the numbers turn in your favour. another issue with this hearts and mind bollocks is that once we leave the enemy move back this was seen extensively in afghanistan . We have to wonder why once the taliban was driven fron the poppy fields that not only the yanks but Brown refused to sign off on destroying the crops as he said it would mean the farmers would be skint that year, never mind the countless addicts worldwide from these crops, the devastation caused to families of burglary to buy drugs, imo this was done more to keep people down as lets face it the more people out of it on drugs the less people will vote.
|
|
|
Marine A
Mar 29, 2017 10:23:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by baggins on Mar 29, 2017 10:23:01 GMT
Is it true they've stripped him of his pension?
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 27, 2017 17:41:15 GMT
It appears he will be released in the early hours of tomorrow morning. Fantastic news, made the hairs on the back of my neck stand on end, can't believe it, imo a miscarriage of justice has almost been undone, good luck Marine A in whatever you choose to do in future , You are sa true hero in every sense of the word , i doff my cap to you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 17:52:05 GMT
Is it true they've stripped him of his pension? No, they cannot do that.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Apr 28, 2017 8:39:07 GMT
As I understand it, the fact he was serving a custodial sentence and was originally "discharged with dishonour" affected his pension calculations. However the discharge has been reclassified and he is now a free man. His QC said on the radio this morning that his full pension entitlement has now been regained.
|
|
|
Post by scoobydoogas on Apr 28, 2017 16:20:04 GMT
Is it true they've stripped him of his pension? No, they cannot do that. They just took his pride and dignity instead. Those lawyers chasing alleged war crimes are bigger scumbags than the ambulance chasers.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Apr 28, 2017 17:18:23 GMT
They just took his pride and dignity instead. Those lawyers chasing alleged war crimes are bigger scumbags than the ambulance chasers. There are bigger unpunished war criminals out there but sadly they appear protected. Hello Tony.
|
|