Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 15:01:06 GMT
Imagine how f**ked of we might be with his signing interview?! "Yeh I had a good time at Bristol Rovers but it's great to have come here and joined Bristol City - they're a massive club" etc etc etc Oh god  They all say that anyway. I bet he doesn't get his Penis out for the cup any time soon. |
|
|
|
Post by gasheadbatesy on Jan 31, 2017 15:02:26 GMT
I hope he has the shortest sh** head career in history and has a career ending injury within 5 mins. The lady garden.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas_Quarters on Jan 31, 2017 15:04:03 GMT
I've not read the whole thread BUT, I thought the release clause figure people have been quoting, is just a minimum bid a club would have to table BEFORE they would be allowed (by parent club BRFC) to talk to MT (or his agent). The actual sale figure could be anything... The board could say yeah go talk to the fella... but we aint selling for anything less than X pounds. Or is that completely wrong? That's exactly how I understand it. A release clause isn't a sale price. It merely means that we have to let the interested club speak to the player. We are under no obligation to sell him even if he agrees terms with them. The only thing for certain is that the sale price has to be at least equal to the release clause price. The size of the release clause is largely irrelevant as all a higher price does is lower the number of teams likely to meet it.
If Rovers decided that they would never sell for less than £5M then it doesn't really matter whether the release clause is set at £1 or £3M. Setting at £1 would mean loads of interest and likely from numerous clubs that couldn't/wouldn't meet a £5M valuation. Setting at £3M would put most clubs off and may mean no interest at all. Or have I misunderstood?
I think that a release clause means that if someone offers that then the club have to accept it, hence the term 'RELEASE'. A player is RELEASED from his contract. But again, this is just what I think, not that I know. |
|
|
|
Post by whoblue on Jan 31, 2017 15:04:27 GMT
I've not read the whole thread BUT, I thought the release clause figure people have been quoting, is just a minimum bid a club would have to table BEFORE they would be allowed (by parent club BRFC) to talk to MT (or his agent). The actual sale figure could be anything... The board could say yeah go talk to the fella... but we aint selling for anything less than X pounds. Or is that completely wrong? That's exactly how I understand it. A release clause isn't a sale price. It merely means that we have to let the interested club speak to the player. We are under no obligation to sell him even if he agrees terms with them. The only thing for certain is that the sale price has to be at least equal to the release clause price. The size of the release clause is largely irrelevant as all a higher price does is lower the number of teams likely to meet it.
If Rovers decided that they would never sell for less than £5M then it doesn't really matter whether the release clause is set at £1 or £3M. Setting at £1 would mean loads of interest and likely from numerous clubs that couldn't/wouldn't meet a £5M valuation. Setting at £3M would put most clubs off and may mean no interest at all. Or have I misunderstood?
A figure of £300k would just put off clubs lower in the pyramid than us. lets face it, who other than the 'big' boys in this league can afford £300k.... I'm sure we can't!?! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 15:04:54 GMT
so was tbone right all along?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 15:05:04 GMT
I hope he has the shortest sh** head career in history and has a career ending injury within 5 mins. The lady garden. No need for that fella. Just trying to better himself that's all. |
|
|
|
Post by RD on Jan 31, 2017 15:05:08 GMT
That's exactly how I understand it. A release clause isn't a sale price. It merely means that we have to let the interested club speak to the player. We are under no obligation to sell him even if he agrees terms with them. The only thing for certain is that the sale price has to be at least equal to the release clause price. The size of the release clause is largely irrelevant as all a higher price does is lower the number of teams likely to meet it.
If Rovers decided that they would never sell for less than £5M then it doesn't really matter whether the release clause is set at £1 or £3M. Setting at £1 would mean loads of interest and likely from numerous clubs that couldn't/wouldn't meet a £5M valuation. Setting at £3M would put most clubs off and may mean no interest at all. Or have I misunderstood?
I think that a release clause means that if someone offers that then the club have to accept it, hence the term 'RELEASE'. A player is RELEASED from his contract. But again, this is just what I think, not that I know. 99% certain that is correct. A release clause is the minimum amount the club that owns the player must accept. 99.9% certain |
|
|
|
Post by HorndeanGas on Jan 31, 2017 15:06:06 GMT
If he has signed then lets us get ready for the push up to championship . and as we sail up we can wave to city and Taylor as they continue the fall.
|
|
|
|
Post by bumble on Jan 31, 2017 15:07:16 GMT
If it wasnt for taylor, wed still be non league! Ifs and Ands, if we hadn't signed him we would have signed someone else, only one of the above statements is provapble and definite. How is either of those statements provable and definite? |
|
|
|
Post by scoobydoogas on Jan 31, 2017 15:07:43 GMT
I don't wish any nasty injury on Taylor. He's a pro footballer who is looking out for his future. He's just made the most unpopular choice of new club. However, I do hope he's a flop over there and adds nothing to their team and isn't the signing that keeps them in the Championship. Hopefully, he'll not last long and will get sold onwards and Rovers will have had the sense to negotiate a sell on clause.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jan 31, 2017 15:08:31 GMT
I hope he has the shortest sh** head career in history and has a career ending injury within 5 mins. The lady garden. No need for that fella. Just trying to better himself that's all. Well he hasn't. So f**k him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 15:09:27 GMT
I think that a release clause means that if someone offers that then the club have to accept it, hence the term 'RELEASE'. A player is RELEASED from his contract. But again, this is just what I think, not that I know. 99% certain that is correct. A release clause is the minimum amount the club that owns the player must accept. 99.9% certain Its 100% certain Roverdrive! A quick Google finds all the info. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 15:10:05 GMT
Why don't I feel more gutted? I was inconsolable when Hayles,Roberts and lambert left. Nowhere near the same feeling towards this. Just gutting to only get 300k I suppose. Yes, he was not easy to like, always seemed disengaged and distant ...now know he only signed in the summer as there was no big wages on offer elsewhere...so he's got his bit wages and **cked off on the last day of the transfer window just like he wanted to do in the Summer. DC thought he could influence him to stay but he was wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by DTGas on Jan 31, 2017 15:10:10 GMT
Scunthorpe reject £4m from Chinese club for Kevin Van Veen. Ah well, 300k ain't bad 🙈
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas_Quarters on Jan 31, 2017 15:10:19 GMT
Until proof comes out saying that we have got a ridiculously low fee for MT, I am not going to be too disappointed about this.
Coincidental timing that the decisive meeting regarding the UWE is within a few days of the transfer deadline? Maybe, maybe not.
If we sell him for £2m+ and that is the difference between us getting the UWE or not getting it then this is the best thing that has ever happened to the club. Onwards and upwards. UTG!
|
|
|
|
Post by bigbumble on Jan 31, 2017 15:10:49 GMT
Clever move planting Taylor to get them relegated......Suddenly everything adds up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jan 31, 2017 15:11:34 GMT
Nobody's bigger than the club
Hope everyone at Rovers reminded him he's a c*nt when he left the training ground
|
|
|
|
Post by slam on Jan 31, 2017 15:12:10 GMT
I've not read the whole thread BUT, I thought the release clause figure people have been quoting, is just a minimum bid a club would have to table BEFORE they would be allowed (by parent club BRFC) to talk to MT (or his agent). The actual sale figure could be anything... The board could say yeah go talk to the fella... but we aint selling for anything less than X pounds. Or is that completely wrong? That's exactly how I understand it. A release clause isn't a sale price. It merely means that we have to let the interested club speak to the player. We are under no obligation to sell him even if he agrees terms with them. The only thing for certain is that the sale price has to be at least equal to the release clause price. The size of the release clause is largely irrelevant as all a higher price does is lower the number of teams likely to meet it.
If Rovers decided that they would never sell for less than £5M then it doesn't really matter whether the release clause is set at £1 or £3M. Setting at £1 would mean loads of interest and likely from numerous clubs that couldn't/wouldn't meet a £5M valuation. Setting at £3M would put most clubs off and may mean no interest at all. Or have I misunderstood?
Has anyone actually confirmed that the release clause was a £300,000 sale price. It could be that the £300,000 refers to the wages - who knows what the sale price could be |
|
|
|
Post by speedwellgas on Jan 31, 2017 15:14:13 GMT
After all the long delays in signing a contract over the summer I'm not surprised if this does materialise.
Still nothing from our twitter account!
|
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Jan 31, 2017 15:14:23 GMT
Ass about face a bit there pal, the signing on fee isn't a set % of the fee, its whatever the player and buying club negotiate i recently read that a well known player who didn't ask for a xfer was entitled to 10% of any fee agreed between the two clubs... Is that something unique to the Premier league ? Unique to that player. A signing on fee is just a bonus that players negotiate in return for signing a contract. It can be anything.
10% used to be the norm, and probably still is, but when you have release clauses or if the player is re-signing or signing on a bosman, it can be a lot more than that.
So where you have a release clause and more than one club interested, both clubs will bid the release clause and then the player will play one against the other regarding signing on fee and wages etc.
|
|
