Player Ratings: Bristol Rovers vs Bradford City (RESULTS)
Feb 13, 2017 10:04:26 GMT
2nd May 1990 likes this
Post by I Voted For Kodos on Feb 13, 2017 10:04:26 GMT
My own opinions from the game:
Lumley 9 Some great saves but also commanded his area well with a strong punch
Leadbitter 6 didn't have any link-up play with Sinclair going forward and perhaps could have done better defensively
Lockyer 7 Real test against a good team, stood up well
Sweeney 7.5
Brown 6 Let too many crosses in
Sinclair 6.5 Good work rate, not really a winger
O. Clarke 6.5 Not quite as good as his usual performances but we didn't allow Bradford to overly dominate the midfield
Lines 7 Same as Clarke really but scored a great goal
Montano 6 Good defensive effort but struggled to stick with the right men as Bradford's diamond rotated around
James 7 Chances didn't fall his way but I thought his build up play was promising. Maybe a generous mark as I want him to suceed
Harrison 5.5 Not his game. Workrate fell about ten minutes before he was subbed.
Subs: Broom 5 Bright and willing but chose the wrong option on the counter-attack when Leads was in a great position. Hopefully it's all a good learning experience though
Gaffney 6 Offers a different style of hold-up play to Harrison. Too cautious and defensive a couple of times though
Lucas NOLE but good to see him getting some (albeit limited for now) game time
Crowd 6
Ref 4
Bradford 8
Lumley 9 Some great saves but also commanded his area well with a strong punch
Leadbitter 6 didn't have any link-up play with Sinclair going forward and perhaps could have done better defensively
Lockyer 7 Real test against a good team, stood up well
Sweeney 7.5
Brown 6 Let too many crosses in
Sinclair 6.5 Good work rate, not really a winger
O. Clarke 6.5 Not quite as good as his usual performances but we didn't allow Bradford to overly dominate the midfield
Lines 7 Same as Clarke really but scored a great goal
Montano 6 Good defensive effort but struggled to stick with the right men as Bradford's diamond rotated around
James 7 Chances didn't fall his way but I thought his build up play was promising. Maybe a generous mark as I want him to suceed
Harrison 5.5 Not his game. Workrate fell about ten minutes before he was subbed.
Subs: Broom 5 Bright and willing but chose the wrong option on the counter-attack when Leads was in a great position. Hopefully it's all a good learning experience though
Gaffney 6 Offers a different style of hold-up play to Harrison. Too cautious and defensive a couple of times though
Lucas NOLE but good to see him getting some (albeit limited for now) game time
Crowd 6
Ref 4
Bradford 8
