|
Post by inee on May 8, 2019 9:59:12 GMT
Nah it's because the fascist mods love excising their power, especially dickhead1981, problem is he really believes in free speech but only if he agrees with it , Is there any need for this ? What's all this them and us. All mods on this forum give up their own time to help it run smoothly so everybody can enjoy it. Gashead81 is a rovers fan, exactly the same as you who deserves respect.Take some time to reflect on this please. Yes mods give up time etc, in reality it's not a lot of time per mod is it(amusing how it's just one or two mods who keep locking threads or banning). Now here's one that will make you think, in my world respect has to be earnt not blindly given, in the same breath i will turn this around you say us and them ,demand respect and yet you have zero respect for jaggas ,so why is it the old one rule for them another one for us( thereby showing that the them and us is alive and kicking amongst you mods you wrote it not me). I looked in the mirror and tried reflecting however the mirror just laughed at me and said get stuffed, reflect on what, are you one who called for me to be banned as well just for disagreeing with you lot
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 8, 2019 9:58:34 GMT
Hennessey. Nazism. What do you expect? what the hell has that got to do with the ira. Love the way people keep bringing he third reich into threads, and yet buy ,wear ,drive and drink goods from people who funded the third reich.
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 8, 2019 9:54:28 GMT
have you never been to Leeds, Chelsea, rangers,or linfield in Belfast, or stoke etc etc, plenty of clubs with loyalist supporters, just saying. You're quite right that it's a regular chant from certain clubs across the country. But Loyalist supporters in Horfield? Oh please. They have no idea what they're singing about, but they have some vague idea that it's a bit offensive to some people, so the numpties do it. They've grown up watching and hearing it sung from years ago, and mindlessly absorbed it as a terrace chant. If they had the brains to make any connection between the IRA song and the birthplace of the manager who has just engineered the great escape from League 2, they might stop bellowing it out, but I wouldn't count on it. C'mon aghast i expected better from you, loyalists in horfield it might surprise you that there are republicans here too, so are you saying our manager is a republican sympathiser, it can only be considered offensive by those who sympathise with the ira
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 8, 2019 9:49:27 GMT
In my complete innocence/ignorance - can somebody tell me what is this 'IRA song'? j Well I’m assuming it’s either: “No surrender, No surrender, No surrender to the IRA” sung to the tune of the hymn “Give me joy in my heart”, or: “When I was young, I had no sense, I bought a flute for fifty pence, The only song that I could play, Was “F**k the City and the IRA” Hope that helps Make me laugh when people complain about the song have they forgotten Park st, Birmingham, Aldershot, brighton etc. Seems to be normal these days to sympathise with terrorists and decry those who are against it, even worse i bet many on here think the ira have went away, funny how the terrorists got away with so much after the so called peace deal and yet want the paras prosecuted.
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 7, 2019 19:09:27 GMT
I don't know any good natured practicing muslim that would advocate or interpret the Sharia law that way. That is a stereo typical comment in itself based on what you see from extremist, terrorist advocation of jihad, what it means and how it should be carried out. Thank you for YOUR opinion, good luck and take care. newmarket he's o blinkered he wouldn't believe in islamic terrorist even if one blew up his car ,still all weak willed cult members stick together ,lets face it he believes in an imaginary friend and wont be going to heaven
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 7, 2019 19:01:04 GMT
His constant insistence that Somalis or Muslims are a problematic race or culture together with his sympathising of Tommy Robinson. Joint mod decision before it gets out of hand. Again. He can’t help himself. He’s only here to cause trouble.
So part of the reason why he got a permaban is because of him sympathising with Tommy Robinson?
Out of order if you ask me.
Nah it's because the fascist mods love excising their power, especially dickhead1981, problem is he really believes in free speech but only if he agrees with it ,
|
|
|
Post by inee on May 7, 2019 19:00:34 GMT
His constant insistence that Somalis or Muslims are a problematic race or culture together with his sympathising of Tommy Robinson. Joint mod decision before it gets out of hand. Again. He can’t help himself. He’s only here to cause trouble. Islam is a problem and to deny that is wrong. Is there anything wrong with sympathising with Tommy Robinson? He is not my cup of tea, but isn't he just the other side of the coin to many in Labour? The Labour anti-Jewish stance is acceptable is it, yet nobody is allowed to criticize Islam? Agreeing with Tommy Robinson is not illegal. What next, rounding up those who listen to Islamic hate preachers in Mosques? Nobs i'm watering myself laughing at the bellers post you replied to ,from a cult follower whose cult is more dangerous than islam if you need blood etc ,the same person that replied to someone about the prosecution of wanky jw's during ww2 in Germany, jumping on the camp bandwagon
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 12:56:23 GMT
finger
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 12:55:25 GMT
This was already asked of one member ,but again he is not mentioned ,in this post only one member is mentioned ,there was no need to name a member as being reported to the mods why not balance it by naming the person who hit the report post button or who complained ,you merely needed to ban jaggas and say he was banned for his comments simple really, however it seems like many mods you were on a power trip and just happened to say oh someone complained we really didn't need to know someone complained. Now before you jump on your high horse i would have posted the same reply to your even if someone was banned who was far left, again your encouraging someone to get into a violent confrontation, then calling them a pussy this is from someone who would never fight to defend his country, so please less of the calling out when you yourself would never use violence or bear arms. To be honest, who reports the post for the mods attention is not relevant. It isn't relevant because it is the content of the post not the person who made it. In this instance however an example had to be made of what is and what is not tolerated with poster mentioned for reference to his comments should someone also want to see what that would be.
It makes me laugh when posters think we are power trippy because we decide to censor someone for an indecent, or in this instance an inhumane approach. Trust me, I get no kicks from banning people here, I am a mod so I can help the owner of this forum keep it on the straight and narrow in full communication and agreement from other mods. All opinions are taken care and consideration of and mods are free to disagree with each other (aren't we Hugo!). That said, a mod can act independently if a clear breech of conduct has been seen. In this instance 3 or 4 mods had a discussion and collectively the consensus was to ban. I am neither encouraging violence or any form of physical confrontation. Not once does my post even suggest physical violence. The gist of it was, if you aren't prepared to say something to someones face and or be educated on common sense and evidence to change your perception basing an opinion of hatred based solely on race, ethnicity, colour or nationality, then, don't say anything at all, and yes those individuals are pussies and lowlifes. But if you do have the gall to say it, don't do it here where you can hide, say it to a proper audience to gauge response to which you want to address the vitriolic nature of your opinion. As an educational process if nothing else. If you don't have the common decency or gall to do it then what is typed here is low, snide, underhand, spineless and weak. As for taking a pacifist position on how to treat my fellow man, your quite correct, I would conscientiously object to picking up arms and pulling the trigger on a human being. I hold my own life and the life of others far greater than perhaps others who would do so. However in this instance you are confusing meek with weak. Never do that. Many greater issues have been sorted with conversation and compromise than aggression and violence. What i do find starling on this thread is that there are other sympathisers to the racists and it soon flushes those out too. Its a sad state of affairs. you misunderstand i haven't said the ban was unjustifiable i said there was no need to inform the world someone complained and name jaggas ,he should have been banned for the specified time ,my point is you say people not be snide and say what they mean and not hide behind the keyboard then encourage people to to do just that, fyi i have never hidden behind the keyboard i have said on several occasions how to identify me and where i sit pre game if anyone wants a chat(chat meaning talk without violence). As for violence did you not say you will kick someones arse in if you don't like what they say. Disliking a religion is not nor will ever be racist and it staggers me that today people still confuse the two, lets face it how many on here would complain if someone said hang the pope, not many that's for sure. As for the pacifist in people i'm sorry but if your family or friend were being attacked physically, then would you not do whatever it takes to protect then ie steaming and destroying the person committing the act if not then that is weak. Your last line racists where people are constantly called racist on here just because they disagree with others, please show me any racist posts in this thread as i cant find em(don't use jaggas as an example).
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 11:41:21 GMT
Now we have the British PM begging for some crumbs from the EU table. The EU are now totally in control of Brexit, they are the ones pulling all the strings. The irony is, this is one of the reasons for voting Leave, to escape the clutches of the EU. Like i said at the either beginning of this thread or another we held all the card gong into this and if the pm backed down we would have absolutely no power and would end up being told what to do. Personal i think may has got what she wants in the long run, as a remainer she was wilsoned into the job and lets face it she could have been the best pm in the history of man(she isn't) but would forever be known as the evil-one who gave us brexit .time will blot out the part cameron had to play hence why he did a wilson, i think shes paying a blinder as a remainer you know bumble along stir up controversy playing one side against the other preparing bad deals to ensure it never happens, and play a turd in terms of her ability to listen and respond to the original vote. I think when she releases he autobiography about her time as pm she will say oh how i f**ked the leavers over.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 11:10:43 GMT
Hi everyone I cannot be bothered to read all the he said she said on this thread because I don’t have the time but also because some of the views on this thread are for me, quite upsetting. I just cannot stand racism, in any form, regardless of how it is intended. It’s repugnant and needs to be stamped out, some how. As mods we tend to let this board be a free for all, within reason, but there is a limit. Now there was a complaint made about jaggas view on the Somali communities. What emotion and context that was typed with is hard to tell, nevertheless, however it was meant, it was still crossed many lines, starting with decency and finished on the bigoted and racist scale. A few of the mods expressed their views on how awful it was, and I agree with them. Not the least is that this person seems to have a consistent far right wing view. That cannot be tolerated on here, so I have banned jaggas for the rest of the month. For those that will cry out, what about free speech, expression and opinion? Well, of course you are welcome to them, but not where public demeaning of fellow human beings are involved purely because of their nationality, ethnicity, background, colour or religion. If you hold so true to those views, how about a walk through Easton or St Paul’s on a Saturday night and announce your views to them through a loudspeaker, or, book yourself a platform in somewhere like the Lebeqs Tavern at the bottom of Stapleton Road and really state your hatred and opinion, you’ll have the perfect audience for your vitriolic hate filled opinion. Don’t fancy that? Because being a spineless keyboard warrior is safer I suppose. Pussies. For the record, if I have to read something similar again through the admin system, I’ll happliy issue bans. Peace out. G81. This was already asked of one member ,but again he is not mentioned ,in this post only one member is mentioned ,there was no need to name a member as being reported to the mods why not balance it by naming the person who hit the report post button or who complained ,you merely needed to ban jaggas and say he was banned for his comments simple really, however it seems like many mods you were on a power trip and just happened to say oh someone complained we really didn't need to know someone complained. Now before you jump on your high horse i would have posted the same reply to your even if someone was banned who was far left, again your encouraging someone to get into a violent confrontation, then calling them a pussy this is from someone who would never fight to defend his country, so please less of the calling out when you yourself would never use violence or bear arms.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 10:55:19 GMT
If I see anything remotely similar from Oldie or anyone else then they can get the old roadhouse treatment from here as well. For those who have watched family guy you'll know what that is! You wont. Debating and or ridiculing opinion is not comparable with making overt comments based upon race, creed or colour. Ah you have never done that have you ??
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 10:53:37 GMT
so a bloke opens a dry cleaners and is killed ,you have to arrange security to travel round ,it tends to unfortunately align with what jaggas was getting at ,have you got any other examples. Oh and i'm not sure if you know cabot(not his name) was never a Bristolian It was an example of the a Somali man that went against the stereo typical type that Jag laid down and you seem so keen to sympathise with. Unfortunately this man lost his life due to the civil conflict. I know Cabot was not a . He was of Italian decent, I say a Bristolian as we have adopted him as one of our own. Tributes to him are all over the city. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t a tyrant though and his practices today would be illegal. Open your mind a tiny bit and reread what i posted i will us slightly different word in the hope you get it. A guy opens a dry cleaners and encourages others to follow his non violent example, said man then gets murdered. .So far you get that bit non violent man imo rather naive, he then gets murdered as do many others daily by low life scum (i'm sure even you agree his murderers are scum not shining examples of humanity), he was not killed by civil conflict ,he was killed by scum who made a conscious decision to murder him at that time on that day, in my opinion more likely murdered because he reused to pay protection or something like that. Somalia has been lawless for how long now is it 20 years or something like that even minor disagreements are sorted with violence, now tell me how people like that where there way of life has evolved like that(i mainly mean people of 30 or below ,not the older generations who have known peace of sorts) , can go to any country and suddenly change the way they have been bought up in an instant and immediately become peaceful and law abiding, life is not like people tell you in their little liberal dogooder pamphlets, the reality is they need to be educated into the ways of our lives and values but they are not. So no i don't sympathise with jaggas merely looking at it with my eyes open,as the link you posted tended on balance to agree with him. And please stop calling cabot a Bristolian,he never was and never will be you can't choose to be a Bristolian you are born one simple as, it winds me up when people change history for the simple reason of slagging Bristol off, you wouldn't call a sailor from London stationed in Scotland a Scot would you, you keep mentioning slavery and Bristols connection but never mention Hannah Moore, in another post on this or another thread you exaggerate the treatment of a minority cult in a vile period of history to garner sympathy,
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 10, 2019 10:14:32 GMT
love it threats of violence from someone belonging to another cult of peace I see no threat of violence here...?? 🤔 roadhouse treatment as per family guy involves someone getting a kicking
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 9, 2019 21:03:20 GMT
"but not where public demeaning of fellow human beings are involved purely because of their nationality, ethnicity, background, colour or religion" I bet Oldie is feeling a bit nervous now ! If I see anything remotely similar from Oldie or anyone else then they can get the old roadhouse treatment from here as well. For those who have watched family guy you'll know what that is! love it threats of violence from someone belonging to another cult of peace
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 9, 2019 20:51:49 GMT
Somalia is a land in the midst of civil war and is no different to most other countries through the course of time, for a vast majority of reasons. When that happens nowadays and how quickly and in-depth news can be reported we always see the atrocities that go on and assume that all of the residents of those countries must be like that. Yes some citizens may be forced, though desperation of poverty to join the ranks of criminal activity or some chose to flee to asylum in another country. For those who choose asylum they are usually given living conditions which, in contrast by our western standards, are poor. The minority then want to continue persecution of these individuals by insinuating they are lazy, troublesome or because they are of a different religious faith with a different skin colour. Haven't these people suffered enough? Of course we will see a criminal element too from them. But lets not tar them all with the same brush, we do a great job of producing our own fair share of horrible breeds here who carry out the most violent and repugnant of crimes. That has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. Man has been inhumane to each other for centuries. People forget that it was only a few hundred years ago that Europeans were burning people alive and stoning them to death for wanting to read a copy of the bible in their native language. Who can forget the repugnant acts of the slave trade that our own fair city held heavy influence over. We laud Cabot as a great Bristolian, and he did some wonderfully kind things, but he was also a mercenary to what would be classed as crimes today. Have a read of this and tell me Somali people are as Jaggas states. www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-45224145so a bloke opens a dry cleaners and is killed ,you have to arrange security to travel round ,it tends to unfortunately align with what jaggas was getting at ,have you got any other examples. Oh and i'm not sure if you know cabot(not his name) was never a Bristolian
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 9, 2019 19:58:53 GMT
Maybe he's just standing by his beliefs even though he will lose money. The Sunday Times made exactly this point recently, inee. I guess if you spend 25 years working in the City, balance sheets are all you see. Anyone who`s prepared to balance his income with other factors, is derided as a lunatic.
It's good to see in times of greed and materialism that some still stand strong ,always amuses me when people take the pish out of others who end up worse off but stick to their beliefs ,money is not the bee all and end all
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 9, 2019 15:02:43 GMT
I'm getting a few "Post Hidden" items appearing which I presume is Oldie quoting me. Bit of a wasted effort as I took the decision to block him - inspired by the likes of Troy Deeney in filtering trolling, bigoted and offensive comments. Very therapeutic 👍 the only problem with blocking people is you remove your ability to respond ,oh and the threads look odd
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 9, 2019 15:00:35 GMT
If it is a Leave or Remain vote, then that won't work as only one result would be 'respected' and acted upon. We already know that a Leave vote will be ignored. That is not a fair race is it. How can you have a two-horse race when only one horse can ever win? This is a sh** show. Leavers are holding strong and whatever the argument will vote leave again. If anyone watched the C4 show last night where a fruit farmer and ardent leaver said he would vote leave again, then in the next breath admitted his business us screwed without free movement. Faced with this idiocy we can only hope that the people who didn't vote last time turn out. If they vote leave, so be it. We, Remainers, will just have to accept that the country is full of lunatics. Maybe he's just standing by his beliefs even though he will lose money.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Apr 4, 2019 23:10:32 GMT
scum
|
|