Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2017 8:40:32 GMT
Regarding Luke James: Was Ollie Clarke the finished article at the start of the season? Are you glad we kept faith now? We have an awesome, committed midfielder who is gas through and through, even if we sell him, he may come back like Lines...if the same people slating LJ had their way, we'd have the same bunch of useless journeymen who got us relegated. He was put in the mix last term EARLY because the snake left. The idea was to bring him on slowly but Clarke hand was forced to play a player who isn't ready. We had nothing else and why not let him get some games? I saw some good flashes of a good player. How about the snake - he had 12 games of nothing? Or lambert, the fat midfielder. Fed up with toys being chucked because we don't get everything we want, all the time. The list of players who took time to learn but ended up a good player is as long as the list as "quality" who did absolutely nothing for us whatsoever. If we can get better, fine, but support anyone who works hard for the club, and I've seen few players work as hard as LJ, and that's why Clarke played him, and not Harrison, who is lazy but a bit more Hollywood. Has DCs reign taught you nothing? HARD WORK BEATS TALENT, in the end. Luke james has played over 160 league games and cost peterbro £600k so he was signed as a player who was "ready". Clarke seldom played him ahead of harrison,his best run of games came when harrison got injured at bolton. Good story though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2017 12:53:31 GMT
Regarding Luke James: Was Ollie Clarke the finished article at the start of the season? Are you glad we kept faith now? We have an awesome, committed midfielder who is gas through and through, even if we sell him, he may come back like Lines...if the same people slating LJ had their way, we'd have the same bunch of useless journeymen who got us relegated. He was put in the mix last term EARLY because the snake left. The idea was to bring him on slowly but Clarke hand was forced to play a player who isn't ready. We had nothing else and why not let him get some games? I saw some good flashes of a good player. How about the snake - he had 12 games of nothing? Or lambert, the fat midfielder. Fed up with toys being chucked because we don't get everything we want, all the time. The list of players who took time to learn but ended up a good player is as long as the list as "quality" who did absolutely nothing for us whatsoever. If we can get better, fine, but support anyone who works hard for the club, and I've seen few players work as hard as LJ, and that's why Clarke played him, and not Harrison, who is lazy but a bit more Hollywood. Has DCs reign taught you nothing? HARD WORK BEATS TALENT, in the end. Luke james has played over 160 league games and cost peterbro £600k so he was signed as a player who was "ready". Clarke seldom played him ahead of harrison,his best run of games came when harrison got injured at bolton. Good story though Luke James is 23 and has played 160 league games. Matt Taylor didn't play league football until 2 years ago. I am not making a case for LJ to get the player of the year award. I am objecting to forum malcontents who slate a player who works harder than most, especially Harrison. Don't be sarcastic as we both know if it comes down to it, your passive aggressive trolling cannot defeat well constructed points of view.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2017 13:31:28 GMT
Luke james has played over 160 league games and cost peterbro £600k so he was signed as a player who was "ready". Clarke seldom played him ahead of harrison,his best run of games came when harrison got injured at bolton. Good story though Luke James is 23 and has played 160 league games. Matt Taylor didn't play league football until 2 years ago. I am not making a case for LJ to get the player of the year award. I am objecting to forum malcontents who slate a player who works harder than most, especially Harrison. Don't be sarcastic as we both know if it comes down to it, your passive aggressive trolling cannot defeat well constructed points of view. I don't think anyone is objecting is work ethic or work rate its his lack of goals which is the most worry especially when your replacing the clubs leading goal scorer for the last 2 seasons. James was brought in for that reason I'm sorry but his lack of goals only proves further that he's not the right man for the job he's had his opportunity at the gas and he didn't perform would rather have someone else in who can. Look at Gaffers he was a loan player but he came in with hardly any league experience but he performed hence why he was signed. I suspect Posh want more than 600k they paid for as it's the way they go about things they buy and sell for a profit if would you want to be forking out more than 600k
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2017 13:32:51 GMT
Luke james has played over 160 league games and cost peterbro £600k so he was signed as a player who was "ready". Clarke seldom played him ahead of harrison,his best run of games came when harrison got injured at bolton. Good story though Luke James is 23 and has played 160 league games. Matt Taylor didn't play league football until 2 years ago. I am not making a case for LJ to get the player of the year award. I am objecting to forum malcontents who slate a player who works harder than most, especially Harrison. Don't be sarcastic as we both know if it comes down to it, your passive aggressive trolling cannot defeat well constructed points of view. I totally agree that luke james works hard and tries his very best but he would have been on good wages and expected to perform from day 1. Also your saying dont slate james but its fine to slate harrison based on your own preferences. Strongly or mildly disagreeing with you does not make someone a troll im afraid it simply means they have a different point of view.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2017 13:37:30 GMT
Luke James is 23 and has played 160 league games. Matt Taylor didn't play league football until 2 years ago. I am not making a case for LJ to get the player of the year award. I am objecting to forum malcontents who slate a player who works harder than most, especially Harrison. Don't be sarcastic as we both know if it comes down to it, your passive aggressive trolling cannot defeat well constructed points of view. I totally agree that luke james works hard and tries his very best but he would have been on good wages and expected to perform from day 1. Also your saying dont slate james but its fine to slate harrison based on your own preferences. Strongly or mildly disagreeing with you does not make someone a troll im afraid it simply means they have a different point of view. Your reputation precedes you Sir.
|
|