|
Post by oldgas on Jan 18, 2019 22:20:20 GMT
We've been paying for him to stay in an apartment in Bristol? Why? And how much has this been costing? #apartmentgate Nothing sinister about this. Think you will find the club provides accomodation for some club staff and players. Always has done, as do most other clubs. Back in the seventies I owned a private flat in a block in Sneyd Park and several Rovers players were accommodated in the same block at the clubs expense. You're just showing off now. Sneyd Park indeed! "Oh look Rupert darling, there's that dreadfully common man wearing a football shirt again, surely he doesn't live here"? "Don't worry Philomena darling, I'll have a word with the management committee, we'll have the bugger out within weeks"
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Jan 18, 2019 22:21:59 GMT
People really need to read up on the role of non-executive director before commenting. #gaschatfacts Go on then- save us the trouble and enlighten us.
|
|
|
Post by RD on Jan 18, 2019 22:35:23 GMT
Hamer.... WYHHB?
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jan 18, 2019 23:30:17 GMT
As far as I am concerned Starmes offers us nothing more than what Steve Hamer does. Just a money saving initiative from where I sit, we would be no worse off if we had not even employed our CEO. One of the reasons we did not see much of our CEO to start with was because he was doing a Top down review of the finances within the club.... to many skeletons in the cupboard i expect
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 19, 2019 0:15:43 GMT
If true, good riddance to a parasite. What in the name of Gerry did he ever contribute that was original? To be fair to SH if he hadn't assisted Wael with the takeover then we might not even exist as a club, not as BRFC1883 anyway. He's probably had to take most of the stick for the ALQ's failings whilst Wael's mostly avoided it.
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Jan 19, 2019 0:55:11 GMT
I really could never understand the point of Hamers role at the club. What was wrong with the owner being the chairman as had always been the case. Higgs may not have covered himself in glory, but at least he had the guts to take responsibility.
|
|
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 19, 2019 6:51:58 GMT
via mobile
Post by peterparker on Jan 19, 2019 6:51:58 GMT
I really could never understand the point of Hamers role at the club. What was wrong with the owner being the chairman as had always been the case. Higgs may not have covered himself in glory, but at least he had the guts to take responsibility. i think that is just a misconception thing of the role of chairman. A chairman can be a non executive role. The responsibility of running the club is the BoD and the CEO, CFO, COO etc depending on the setup. NH was majority shareholder and Chairman, he takes the flack, but the running of the club was the responsibility of him, Watola, Boycie et al. GD was the main man for years without being Chairman
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 19, 2019 11:10:58 GMT
A Chairman can be non-exec but is that the case with SH or is he also being replaced as Chairman?
Although god knows why we need a Chairman on £70K + an apartment, which has to cost £1,000+ p.m.,and a CEO on a similar package, plus an HoR seemingly doing little given we have no budget to bring in players. We're being run like a top 6 Div 1 side in the Boardroom etc whilst languishing in the bottom 6.
|
|
|
Post by wertongas on Jan 19, 2019 11:28:59 GMT
Chairman are normally there to Chair meetings and represent the organisation, being non executive means Hamer will no longer be involved in the everyday running of the club that is Starns job. He can claim expenses but should not be taking a wage. In the past Hamer has been doing more than what would be expected of a Chairman.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 19, 2019 12:47:32 GMT
Chairman are normally there to Chair meetings and represent the organisation, being non executive means Hamer will no longer be involved in the everyday running of the club that is Starns job. He can claim expenses but should not be taking a wage. In the past Hamer has been doing more than what would be expected of a Chairman. What you mean it's not normal for a chairman to do commentary?
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Jan 19, 2019 13:10:51 GMT
Chairman are normally there to Chair meetings and represent the organisation, being non executive means Hamer will no longer be involved in the everyday running of the club that is Starns job. He can claim expenses but should not be taking a wage. In the past Hamer has been doing more than what would be expected of a Chairman. That really depends on what you expect from a chairman.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 19, 2019 15:03:49 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2019 15:03:49 GMT
A NED can (and should expect to) receive a directors fee in return for attending board meetings and offering advice and guidance on all of the company’s matters when asked to. A NED should also hold the executive management to account, and ensure that financial filings (ie timely production of annual accounts) is done.
|
|
|
Post by 1883 on Jan 19, 2019 15:42:52 GMT
A NED can (and should expect to) receive a directors fee in return for attending board meetings and offering advice and guidance on all of the company’s matters when asked to. A NED should also hold the executive management to account, and ensure that financial filings (ie timely production of annual accounts) is done. Spot on, increasing responsibilities of NED's as well mean I would guess the fee would be £12-£20k, but there are some paid MUCH more, & a few still for Free (usually only for connected companies)
|
|
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 19, 2019 17:37:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by chilly1883 on Jan 19, 2019 17:37:52 GMT
He’s got more time to brush up on his Radio skills👍🏽 Given the choice, would rather have SH than KB on the radio commentary. given the choice, I would ban the pair of them, it’s what I call, scraping the barrell
|
|
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 19, 2019 18:19:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by LJG on Jan 19, 2019 18:19:20 GMT
People really need to read up on the role of non-executive director before commenting. #gaschatfacts Go on then- save us the trouble and enlighten us. You have the internet.
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Jan 19, 2019 19:03:28 GMT
Go on then- save us the trouble and enlighten us. You have the internet. Cop-out!
|
|
|
Post by gaschat on Jan 19, 2019 19:41:21 GMT
wakeupirene has given a very concise precise of the duties and responsibilities of a NED
|
|
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 20, 2019 0:50:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by LJG on Jan 20, 2019 0:50:34 GMT
Of your own effort to Google three words? Yes you have.
|
|
|
Mr Hamer
Jan 20, 2019 1:05:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Jan 20, 2019 1:05:31 GMT
If true, good riddance to a parasite. What in the name of Gerry did he ever contribute that was original? To be fair to SH if he hadn't assisted Wael with the takeover then we might not even exist as a club, not as BRFC1883 anyway. He's probably had to take most of the stick for the ALQ's failings whilst Wael's mostly avoided it. That's fair but doesn't warrant the sanction of being made Chairman. And claim £75k a year!? Not in my opinion anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 20, 2019 8:57:48 GMT
To be fair to SH if he hadn't assisted Wael with the takeover then we might not even exist as a club, not as BRFC1883 anyway. He's probably had to take most of the stick for the ALQ's failings whilst Wael's mostly avoided it. That's fair but doesn't warrant the sanction of being made Chairman. And claim £75k a year!? Not in my opinion anyway. I can't understand a lot of the expenditure by the owners, nor what the end picture is supposed to look like. Most likely a Div 2 side in Admin the way we're heading.
|
|