Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2019 20:39:26 GMT
This seems to me like 1 or 2 are going to be moved on. I’d probably say Riley is candidate number one to be moved. But this all makes the Dion Moore contract all the more pointless
|
|
|
Post by Hudson1883 on Jul 26, 2019 20:41:36 GMT
We had too few, now we have too many? Give me strength.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2019 20:42:21 GMT
Get rid of Reilly and Nichols as far as I am concerned! Why keep them, they are supposed to be strikers and have failed totally on that front.
|
|
|
Post by Icegas on Jul 26, 2019 20:42:34 GMT
For me we needed creative midfielders/wingers much more than two loan strikers.Happy to give the pair a chance tho,not that Ive got a choice tbf.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2019 20:43:41 GMT
We had too few, now we have too many? Give me strength. I’ve never said we had too few tbh. But 6 is far too many imo. Most clubs don’t have more than 5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2019 20:46:16 GMT
For me we needed creative midfielders/wingers much more than two loan strikers.Happy to give the pair a chance tho,not that Ive got a choice tbf. id assume the wages for these loan players are paid by the parent club? We’ve cut our wage budget already which was needed and there are still more to go out id think
|
|
|
Post by Icegas on Jul 26, 2019 20:49:35 GMT
Get rid of Reilly and Nichols as far as I am concerned! Why keep them, they are supposed to be strikers and have failed totally on that front. Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2019 20:55:46 GMT
Get rid of Reilly and Nichols as far as I am concerned! Why keep them, they are supposed to be strikers and have failed totally on that front. Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget. I agree Reilly has not had the chances Nichols has. However I consider he and Nichols are both lightweights and look like boys playing against men . I can't see that changing anytime soon.
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Jul 26, 2019 21:03:22 GMT
Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget. I agree Reilly has not had the chances Nichols has. However I consider he and Nichols are both lightweights and look like boys playing against men . I can't see that changing anytime soon. What is this obsession about having a team of giants? Taylor was hardly very tall yet he blossomed into a great striker after having a poor start with us. Give Reilly a chance and he might surprise us.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Jul 26, 2019 21:04:08 GMT
I prefer Reilly to Nichols. Loved the goal he scored at Plymouth. I think he will be better this season. They need to get Nichols on the next train to Exeter...……………………..but they wont. He's here for another season. £365k up against the wall.
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Jul 26, 2019 21:09:42 GMT
Get rid of Reilly and Nichols as far as I am concerned! Why keep them, they are supposed to be strikers and have failed totally on that front. Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget. Trouble us with Reilly that he has little else to his game. Nichols offer us more overall.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Jul 26, 2019 21:12:22 GMT
Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget. Trouble us with Reilly that he has little else to his game. Nichols offer us more overall. Yes he goes down very well, and not one hair out of place
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Jul 26, 2019 21:14:07 GMT
Trouble us with Reilly that he has little else to his game. Nichols offer us more overall. Yes he goes down very well, and not one hair out of place He does put himself about to be fair. Something that improved in his game last season.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Jul 26, 2019 21:21:24 GMT
We have five and a half strikers at the club
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jul 26, 2019 21:22:08 GMT
Weren’t people moaning about needing another striker earlier?
|
|
|
Post by Icegas on Jul 26, 2019 21:26:00 GMT
Reilly has never had a run in the side like Tom has.If he had the same run as Nichols in the 1st team then he would get 10 goals at least in a season.Is that good enough for us,maybe not but still. Tom is an interesting one tho.As a goalscorer he has failed at this club majorly.No way it can be argued,its fact.He has been totally sh**.But his overall play at times has been good and has added to us at times. It will be a joke if Tom Nichols starts a 3rd season with us as the main striker after Clarke Harris regardless of our budget. Trouble us with Reilly that he has little else to his game. Nichols offer us more overall. Agreed but both were simply signed to score goals.One cant...like at all.And one has the potential to be a bang on AVG L1 goal scorer. We may have three tents that we call- 😂😂 stands,but I hope with our fanbase that we are aiming for more in L1 then hoping that these two will save us.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,772
|
Post by pirate on Jul 26, 2019 21:28:56 GMT
Quality over quantity.
|
|
|
Post by GasAttacK on Jul 26, 2019 21:46:29 GMT
Reilly offers nothing when he plays and 4 goals in 35 appearances is simply no where near good enough for a player that doesn't contribute anything else.
Nichols goal record is even worse but he at least links play and creates chances for others. He contributed to far more goals last season than Reilly and the team generally played better when he was in it.
Not saying either are good enough but if one were to go I hope it's Reilly.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jul 26, 2019 22:11:40 GMT
I prefer Reilly to Nichols. Really? Thought you were a big Nichols fan??
|
|
|
Post by simonj on Jul 26, 2019 22:26:07 GMT
Get rid of Reilly and Nichols as far as I am concerned! Why keep them, they are supposed to be strikers and have failed totally on that front. Ffs Reilly one season and not many chances.
|
|