|
Post by gasheadbatesy on Oct 4, 2019 21:21:46 GMT
Sorry if been covered else where but where do the other 22 league 1 clubs (f**k Bolton) stand as to money lost for the non event v bury at home. Clubs would have budgeted for 23 games so who picks up the bill? Season ticket holders paid to watch 23 games. Surely we and 10,000s of season ticket holders should be recompensed by the efl, not our football clubs as they are already losing out.
|
|
|
Post by c4h10 on Oct 4, 2019 21:28:36 GMT
Fair point. Help! I've been robbed.
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Oct 4, 2019 21:54:32 GMT
This is all very true, but I confidently predict that the EFL will tell all disgruntled supporters to go and f### themselves.
And there's nothing anyone can do about it.
|
|
|
Post by lympstonegas on Oct 4, 2019 22:13:55 GMT
This is all very true, but I confidently predict that the EFL will tell all disgruntled supporters to go and f### themselves. And there's nothing anyone can do about it. So does that also apply to the football clubs as well as that’s also budgeted revenue
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Oct 4, 2019 22:45:47 GMT
This is all very true, but I confidently predict that the EFL will tell all disgruntled supporters to go and f### themselves. And there's nothing anyone can do about it. So does that also apply to the football clubs as well as that’s also budgeted revenue I suppose so. The EFL would merely say "Bury failed to prove they had the necessary funds to complete the League 1 season. Therefore they were expelled from the league. Its not the fault of the EFL that Bury FC failed to fulfil their fixtures, and therefore not the responsibility of the EFL for any losses incurred by other clubs as a result of Bury FC's default. If you wish to sue for loss of earnings we can pass Bury FC's details on to you. Good luck with that; they've ceased trading.
|
|
|
Post by teanbiscuits on Oct 4, 2019 23:14:45 GMT
So does that also apply to the football clubs as well as that’s also budgeted revenue I suppose so. The EFL would merely say "Bury failed to prove they had the necessary funds to complete the League 1 season. Therefore they were expelled from the league. Its not the fault of the EFL that Bury FC failed to fulfil their fixtures, and therefore not the responsibility of the EFL for any losses incurred by other clubs as a result of Bury FC's default. If you wish to sue for loss of earnings we can pass Bury FC's details on to you. Good luck with that; they've ceased trading. It is their fault as they should have been gone before the season started.
|
|
|
Post by darkbluegas on Oct 4, 2019 23:23:44 GMT
Apparently the EFL have offered a game against an Under 21 Premier League side of our choice at home by way of compensation.
Who would you choose
|
|
|
Post by CrispPusher on Oct 5, 2019 2:41:53 GMT
Not a great reflection on the Football League our lack of a fixture this weekend, but then again our next fixture is against a club that shouldn't even exist so they don't exactly have a great record in that regard.
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Oct 5, 2019 7:33:26 GMT
Sorry if been covered else where but where do the other 22 league 1 clubs (f**k Bolton) stand as to money lost for the non event v bury at home. Clubs would have budgeted for 23 games so who picks up the bill? Season ticket holders paid to watch 23 games. Surely we and 10,000s of season ticket holders should be recompensed by the efl, not our football clubs as they are already losing out. Where do the EFL get their money from?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2019 7:37:28 GMT
Bury have certainly benefitted from their demise. The Premier League solidarity payment to all league one clubs of £675k has still been paid to them. They received the first half payment in August and will receive the second payment in January when all the other clubs receive theirs.
|
|
|
Post by Baxtinho on Oct 5, 2019 8:03:35 GMT
Done to death on the other thread, but I think Coventry are offering money off next year's ST by way of "compensation".
I get why some are unhappy but I don't think we can moan about the club being skint, then demand a discount
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Oct 5, 2019 9:33:34 GMT
Bury have certainly benefitted from their demise. The Premier League solidarity payment to all league one clubs of £675k has still been paid to them. They received the first half payment in August and will receive the second payment in January when all the other clubs receive theirs.Why? They were expelled from the EFL. Surely that should be re-distributed to the other 23 clubs in the league as way of compensation for the non game. Even if they don’t re-distribute the money it shouldn’t go to Bury. UTG!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2019 10:16:46 GMT
Bury have certainly benefitted from their demise. The Premier League solidarity payment to all league one clubs of £675k has still been paid to them. They received the first half payment in August and will receive the second payment in January when all the other clubs receive theirs.Why? They were expelled from the EFL. Surely that should be re-distributed to the other 23 clubs in the league as way of compensation for the non game. Even if they don’t re-distribute the money it shouldn’t go to Bury. UTG! Because the PL in their intimate wisdom say they deserve their support. I think we can all make our minds up on what we think of it.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Oct 5, 2019 11:20:32 GMT
Why? They were expelled from the EFL. Surely that should be re-distributed to the other 23 clubs in the league as way of compensation for the non game. Even if they don’t re-distribute the money it shouldn’t go to Bury. UTG! Because the PL in their intimate wisdom say they deserve their support. I think we can all make our minds up on what we think of it. I hadn’t seen that, thanks. Blimey, it goes from bad to worse doesn’t it? Presumably all payments go to “the club” which means the owners. You are kidding, they are giving that crook about £330,000 (50% of £675k). That leaves me speechless if true. UTG!
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Oct 5, 2019 11:29:16 GMT
Because the PL in their intimate wisdom say they deserve their support. I think we can all make our minds up on what we think of it. I hadn’t seen that, thanks. Blimey, it goes from bad to worse doesn’t it? Presumably all payments go to “the club” which means the owners. You are kidding, they are giving that crook about £330,000 (50% of £675k). That leaves me speechless if true. UTG! Unfortunately that sort of crap happens all the time. How much did Thomas Cook Directors fleece, how much did Sir Fred take out of RBS, it's nothing new.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 5, 2019 11:41:32 GMT
Bury have certainly benefitted from their demise. The Premier League solidarity payment to all league one clubs of £675k has still been paid to them. They received the first half payment in August and will receive the second payment in January when all the other clubs receive theirs.Why? They were expelled from the EFL. Surely that should be re-distributed to the other 23 clubs in the league as way of compensation for the non game. Even if they don’t re-distribute the money it shouldn’t go to Bury. UTG! www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-7487377/Premier-League-let-Bury-rescue-money-Ross-Barkleys-spot-kick-job-surprised-team-mates.htmlI could see the logic in paying them if they'd gone bust mid-season but to get it w/o even starting one game this season seems bizarre to me. Although I guess the debtors need it more than we do, just hope it goes to them and not the former owners.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Oct 5, 2019 14:13:17 GMT
I hadn’t seen that, thanks. Blimey, it goes from bad to worse doesn’t it? Presumably all payments go to “the club” which means the owners. You are kidding, they are giving that crook about £330,000 (50% of £675k). That leaves me speechless if true. UTG! Unfortunately that sort of crap happens all the time. How much did Thomas Cook Directors fleece, how much did Sir Fred take out of RBS, it's nothing new. Yes perhaps but usually before anyone realises what crooks they are or were. In this case we all know that the Bury owners have been milking the club for a few years. UTG!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2019 15:34:13 GMT
Christ - mis-sold endowments, PPI, mis-sold mortgages, ambulance chasers and now this. Are we facing loads of tv adverts and cold calling now telling us we may be due compensation we deserve!!!!
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Oct 5, 2019 20:14:29 GMT
As far as I know, the EFL are owned by the clubs and any profit (£2mill last year) is either retained for future expenses, given the the EFL Trust charity or redistributed to the clubs.
So how would this compensation - what about 2 hundred grand each, so over £4.5 mill - be paid for? Would it be paid by the charity, or by our fellow clubs?
What would be the basis for this compensation, bearing in mind that the league have merely followed their rules in expelling Bury, rules which were agreed on by the clubs?
|
|
|
Post by gaschat on Oct 5, 2019 20:27:02 GMT
Sorry if been covered else where but where do the other 22 league 1 clubs (f**k Bolton) stand as to money lost for the non event v bury at home. Clubs would have budgeted for 23 games so who picks up the bill? Season ticket holders paid to watch 23 games. Surely we and 10,000s of season ticket holders should be recompensed by the efl, not our football clubs as they are already losing out. Sorry if I’m missing the point but why **** Bolton?
|
|