|
|
Post by barleycorn48 on Mar 11, 2020 15:13:02 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last nights booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player.
|
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,129 
|
Post by Marshy on Mar 11, 2020 15:15:50 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. Don’t worry about it, we won f**k em! |
|
|
|
Post by gretschgas on Mar 11, 2020 15:17:46 GMT
Can you appeal yellows? We are appealing to get Adrian Tucker's yellow recinded though. Must be the first time a team has ever appealed against a booking to a goalkeeping coach 🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 11, 2020 16:06:25 GMT
Pretty sure you can only appeal reds, although Hargreaves isn't going to ever get suspended this season anyway.
A public apology from the ref or at least via the FA would be appreciated though.
|
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Mar 11, 2020 16:29:23 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Mar 11, 2020 16:44:03 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. That is irrelevant. As the ball was still in play when the contact was made, it was a clear foul and penalty.
Your argument might apply if the ref judged that the keeper denied a clear goal-scoring opportunity, in which case (under current interpretation) most likely a penalty and a yellow for the keeper.
Having said all of that, I am with Marshy on this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colyton Gas on Mar 11, 2020 16:44:28 GMT
Were his numbers missing from the back of his shirt at one point?
|
|
|
|
Post by lastminutewinner on Mar 11, 2020 16:50:07 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. Don’t worry about it, we won f**k em!
yeah just give the ref negative feedback in the normal way and move on...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2020 16:50:52 GMT
Were his numbers missing from the back of his shirt at one point? Yes, he had to change his shirt, as there was blood on it. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 11, 2020 16:56:18 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. A penalty is just for a foul in the penalty area. Nothing to do with having control of the ball or a goal-scoring opportunity. |
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,129
|
Post by Marshy on Mar 11, 2020 17:15:31 GMT
Were his numbers missing from the back of his shirt at one point? Yes, he had to change his shirt, as there was blood on it. It’s a shame that it wasn’t the refs. |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Mar 11, 2020 17:22:26 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. That seems to be a problem with referees. Anything they deem not a penalty seems to be deemed a dive and a yellow handed out.
Even if it wasn't a penalty last night, what was Hargreaves supposed to do? just get clattered by on rushing the keeper, ironically earning a penalty
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2020 17:27:13 GMT
I hope the club intend to appeal against last night booking. The referee was wrong not to give a penalty and added to his error by booking the young player. So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. What on earth are you on about? |
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Mar 11, 2020 17:58:12 GMT
So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. What on earth are you on about? What I've seen on the match highlights. Just being totally honest. Had a penalty been given I'd have rejoiced with the rest of you. Just saying, that's all. |
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Mar 11, 2020 18:01:12 GMT
So you thought he would have controlled the ball and scored or laid it back, had the keeper not brought him down? I rather doubt it, the ball was virtually over the line. However, I completely agree CH did not dive and shouldn't have been booked. A penalty is just for a foul in the penalty area. Nothing to do with having control of the ball or a goal-scoring opportunity. I stand corrected. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2020 18:09:50 GMT
What on earth are you on about? What I've seen on the match highlights. Just being totally honest. Had a penalty been given I'd have rejoiced with the rest of you. Just saying, that's all. I presumed it was a wind up - what does the ball possibly running out of play have to do with whether it’s a foul or not? If that was a get out clause you’d have late two footed challenges going in all over the place! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2020 18:10:52 GMT
A penalty is just for a foul in the penalty area. Nothing to do with having control of the ball or a goal-scoring opportunity. I stand corrected. Said the man in the orthopaedic shoes (Alan Partridge!) |
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Mar 11, 2020 18:21:55 GMT
Said the man in the orthopaedic shoes (Alan Partridge!) Yes, I do wear them. Well, inserts anyway . |
|
|
|
Post by neilv93 on Mar 11, 2020 18:29:57 GMT
Honestly one of the most blatant penalties I've EVER seen that has not been given - outrageous. Mind you, we got one later on anyway and won the (a!) game so I'm willing to let it slide!
|
|
