|
|
Post by Cantankerous Gas on Nov 14, 2014 20:12:29 GMT
3:26 - Foul by Adam Cunnington (Cambridge United) 16:01 - Foul by Adam Cunnington (Cambridge United) 16:54 - Foul by Adam Cunnington (Cambridge United) 18:05 Attempt saved. Adam Cunnington (Cambridge United) right footed shot from the right side of the box is saved in the top right corner.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mark Ash on Nov 14, 2014 20:20:17 GMT
Why did they play for three hours - to get him to score?
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 14, 2014 20:47:07 GMT
You have to laugh AC, who couldn't get a fame for us recently, starting in Div 2 whilst JJOT watches him form the bench!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Nov 14, 2014 20:55:24 GMT
Cunnington scores.
|
|
|
|
Post by cookinongas on Nov 14, 2014 21:09:40 GMT
Just been subed
|
|
|
|
Post by trueblue on Nov 14, 2014 22:03:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gasheadliam on Nov 14, 2014 22:04:23 GMT
Header from a corner. Funny how he couldn't get a header from a corner on target for us. Forest Green comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fetch on Nov 14, 2014 22:34:28 GMT
Why slag off the bloke when he scored three crucial goals for us? No lack of effort or commitment, and a fair amount of goals and hold up play whilst he was here. Cut him some slack.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Nov 14, 2014 22:36:31 GMT
Why slag off the bloke when he scored three crucial goals for us? No lack of effort or commitment, and a fair amount of goals and hold up play whilst he was here. Cut him some slack. I was a fan personally. Seems to split opinion though. Maybe because he is not the type of player who is ever really going to excite? |
|
|
|
Post by lympstonegas on Nov 15, 2014 0:14:36 GMT
Why slag off the bloke when he scored three crucial goals for us? No lack of effort or commitment, and a fair amount of goals and hold up play whilst he was here. Cut him some slack. Because unbelievably there are people on here that seemingly want to see our club fail and will use any issue to find ammunition to slate the club/ board. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 15, 2014 0:51:47 GMT
Would have scored plenty for us if we'd had wingers.
Anyone who can't see that he was wasted in our side the way we play doesn't know anything about football.
Hoofing it at him down the center and not supporting him was a waste of time.
If we'd had a couple of decent wingers getting down to the byline and crossing it in he would have scored plenty.
I really liked him he won most of his headers and battled well every game I saw him play ( most of them).
Some peoples attitudes in this forum are really starting to
water me off, I came into this forum because it first appeared that there where less miserable tossers than the other one but I'm starting to wonder if that's the case.
UTG
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 15, 2014 1:06:14 GMT
I'm thinking back to how many decent crosses I saw into him and I can think of four.
He scored 3 and hit the post/ keeper saved the other.
Not bad and a good target man playing in a side with no wingers can't fault him for that.
I think he's probably left just when he would have been used to his best with the new young winger on loan and hopefully Balanta coming in from injury who's apparently a wide player.
Can't blame Cambridge for wanting him back though he's easily good enough for league 2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 6:49:16 GMT
Why slag off the bloke when he scored three crucial goals for us? No lack of effort or commitment, and a fair amount of goals and hold up play whilst he was here. Cut him some slack. Because unbelievably there are people on here that seemingly want to see our club fail and will use any issue to find ammunition to slate the club/ board. Really? Name them. |
|
|
|
Post by Wembley_Gas on Nov 15, 2014 6:56:56 GMT
Because unbelievably there are people on here that seemingly want to see our club fail and will use any issue to find ammunition to slate the club/ board. Really? Name them. That would be attacking the poster not the post.....we don't do that on here, apparently. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 7:12:18 GMT
That would be attacking the poster not the post.....we don't do that on here, apparently. So you can make an accusation without the risk of being challenged, cool. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 7:24:44 GMT
Some posters are positive.
Some posters are negative.
Some posters support the Board.
Some posters don't support the Board.
Some negative posters support the Board.
Some don't.
Some positive posters support the board.
Some don't.
Everyone here bar maybe one want Rovers to succed.
It's up to you which you are.
All of the above are facts.
|
|
|
|
Post by lympstonegas on Nov 15, 2014 8:32:11 GMT
That would be attacking the poster not the post.....we don't do that on here, apparently. So you can make an accusation without the risk of being challenged, cool. Please see your post above - isn't that personally challenging me and then asking me to attack others - pathetic. I stand by my observation as it's true IMHO |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 9:48:24 GMT
So you can make an accusation without the risk of being challenged, cool. Please see your post above - isn't that personally challenging me and then asking me to attack others - pathetic. I stand by my observation as it's true IMHO You have already attacked others the only thing missing is that you don't have the balls to name names. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 9:49:43 GMT
Some posters are positive. Some posters are negative. Some posters support the Board. Some posters don't support the Board. Some negative posters support the Board. Some don't. Some positive posters support the board. Some don't. Everyone here bar maybe one want Rovers to succed. It's up to you which you are. All of the above are facts. Assuming the one not wanting Rovers to succeed is a red, I would agree with this. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2014 9:58:47 GMT
Some posters are positive. Some posters are negative. Some posters support the Board. Some posters don't support the Board. Some negative posters support the Board. Some don't. Some positive posters support the board. Some don't. Everyone here bar maybe one want Rovers to succed. It's up to you which you are. All of the above are facts. Assuming the one not wanting Rovers to succeed is a red, I would agree with this.  |
|
