|
Post by gasincider on Sept 6, 2020 11:26:35 GMT
6 resolutions and one special resolution that we are asked to vote for by proxy in advance due to restricted number of people who can ZOOM in at one time.
Up to an aggregate nominal value of £495,000 shares to be issued which I presume will be utilised to 'write off' the debt. Presumably the charge might then be removed.
No mention of any question and answer session in any shape or form.
Total farce. Wael for obvious reasons would be unable to attend, so why can he not be the sole recipient of a Zoom connection, and the meeting be held in either of the main stands? There is never more than 100 people in attendance, so if we can't manage that, how will we ever be allowed fans into the stadium?
And before anyone says it wouldnt be ideal because of possible possible weather issues, we'd be there for a game, so why not?
|
|
|
Post by singupgas on Sept 6, 2020 11:48:59 GMT
In Waels defense, fans going back to watch Bristol Rovers won't be a decision made by Bristol Rovers...if you are not watching football in October don't be too surprised.
Regards AGM, there is never any great reveals, that us fans really want to know and get excited about...Will we ever find out more about the FM or another stadium development probably not.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Sept 6, 2020 11:55:13 GMT
In Waels defenae fans going back to watch Bristol Rovers won't be a decision made by Bristol Rovers...if you are watching football in October don't be too surprised. Regards AGM, there is never any great reveals, that us fans really want to know and get excited about...Will we ever find out more about the FM or another stadium development probably not. October? Gas Incider? Negative post? Surely not
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Sept 6, 2020 11:56:49 GMT
Don't disagree with what you say singup, but an AGM is a requirement under company law, and our club should be looking to maximise the shareholders involvement, subject obviously to health considerations.
I think it would be difficult to suggest we couldn't cope with a hundred or so people in the dribuild.
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Sept 6, 2020 11:58:01 GMT
In Waels defenae fans going back to watch Bristol Rovers won't be a decision made by Bristol Rovers...if you are watching football in October don't be too surprised. Regards AGM, there is never any great reveals, that us fans really want to know and get excited about...Will we ever find out more about the FM or another stadium development probably not. October? Gas Incider? Negative post? Surely not A constructive comment from gassy? Surely not.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 6, 2020 12:42:14 GMT
6 resolutions and one special resolution that we are asked to vote for by proxy in advance due to restricted number of people who can ZOOM in at one time. Up to an aggregate nominal value of £495,000 shares to be issued which I presume will be utilised to 'write off' the debt. Presumably the charge might then be removed. No mention of any question and answer session in any shape or form. Total farce. Wael for obvious reasons would be unable to attend, so why can he not be the sole recipient of a Zoom connection, and the meeting be held in either of the main stands? There is never more than 100 people in attendance, so if we can't manage that, how will we ever be allowed fans into the stadium? And before anyone says it wouldnt be ideal because of possible possible weather issues, we'd be there for a game, so why not? Yawn.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Sept 6, 2020 13:07:07 GMT
I dont blame them for having a virtual meeting.
I'm sure that if we had called a meeting for 100 people during a pandemic someone would have attempted to use that against the board.
But then, I'm fairly cynical.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 6, 2020 13:17:12 GMT
I dont blame them for having a virtual meeting. I'm sure that if we had called a meeting for 100 people during a pandemic someone would have attempted to use that against the board. But then, I'm fairly cynical. There's no way your company has 100 bog cleaners.
|
|
|
Post by Charlton Hayes Gas on Sept 6, 2020 13:30:18 GMT
Is a zoom meeting during a global pandemic really that big an issue?
What would be gained other than the social aspect from having the meeting at the stadium than Zoom? I imagine People still might not be comfortable leaving the house still and I wouldn’t blame them.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 6, 2020 13:40:39 GMT
Is a zoom meeting during a global pandemic really that big an issue? What would be gained other than the social aspect from having the meeting at the stadium than Zoom? I imagine People still might not be comfortable leaving the house still and I wouldn’t blame them. Ignore him, it's just another lazy dig at the owner.
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Sept 6, 2020 13:44:16 GMT
What did you think of the match yesterday gasincider? Would enjoy hearing your views on some actual football for a change.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 6, 2020 13:54:59 GMT
What did you think of the match yesterday gasincider? Would enjoy hearing your views on some actual football for a change. Going to wait a while.
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Sept 6, 2020 13:57:41 GMT
What did you think of the match yesterday gasincider? Would enjoy hearing your views on some actual football for a change. Going to wait a while. Who cares about the football that a "football club" plays, when you can just stick your oar in on the club politics every few weeks instead.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Sept 6, 2020 17:13:57 GMT
October? Gas Incider? Negative post? Surely not A constructive comment from gassy? Surely not. Once per year, if you're lucky Haven't seen any comments on the playing side in a while though
|
|
|
Post by CheshireGas on Sept 6, 2020 18:10:32 GMT
6 resolutions and one special resolution that we are asked to vote for by proxy in advance due to restricted number of people who can ZOOM in at one time. Up to an aggregate nominal value of £495,000 shares to be issued which I presume will be utilised to 'write off' the debt. Presumably the charge might then be removed. No mention of any question and answer session in any shape or form. Total farce. Wael for obvious reasons would be unable to attend, so why can he not be the sole recipient of a Zoom connection, and the meeting be held in either of the main stands? There is never more than 100 people in attendance, so if we can't manage that, how will we ever be allowed fans into the stadium? And before anyone says it wouldnt be ideal because of possible possible weather issues, we'd be there for a game, so why not? Yet another attempt to throw a grenade in a puddle and walk away. Really is getting tedious. Any chance you have a view on football? To lead a life so full of hatred, rage and bitterness is bad for both your mental , emotional and physical well being. But then we know you won't wait around to answer any questions or challenges, will you. Government advice - Where gatherings have more than 30 people, those operating venues should take additional steps to ensure the safety of the public and prevent large gatherings or mass events from taking place. See section 3 for details on what activities are permitted in multi-use community facilities. Section 3 states 3d: Meetings and civic functions We continue to recommend that where meetings can take place digitally without the need for face-to-face contact, they should continue to do so. Where community facilities need to be used for physical meetings, these meetings should be managed within the social distancing guidance and principles set out above. The principles set out in the ‘Safer workplaces’ guidance apply, including but not limited to: meetings of civic, political or community groups (e.g. parish council meeting, ward meeting of political party; charity board of trustees) MP or councillor surgery/drop-in sessions. The government is discouraging unnecessary physical attendance at meetings. Where necessary to take place physically, participants should maintain 2 metres (or 1 metre with risk mitigation) separation throughout public meetings and local consultations (e.g. planning) Local authorities in England have some powers to hold public meetings virtually by using video or telephone conferencing technology. The Government is actively discouraging meetings of more than 30 people. Serious fines and bans can be imposed by Local Authorities. Are you saying BRFC should tempt the wrath of Local Government to appease your hostility and angst?
|
|
|
Post by gasandelectricity on Sept 6, 2020 21:06:12 GMT
There are ways of holding meetings beyond a handful of attendees.
It’s only an agm though for a company which is majority owned br someone who is free to do whatever they like
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Sept 6, 2020 21:52:38 GMT
He just fancied another rant at the owner with a load of baseless and unfounded accusations probably. With Zoom it gives you the ability to turn someone off..!!
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Sept 7, 2020 5:04:21 GMT
He just fancied another rant at the owner with a load of baseless and unfounded accusations probably. Very sad.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Sept 7, 2020 7:18:57 GMT
The resolutions are passed so...
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Sept 7, 2020 9:06:58 GMT
I dont blame them for having a virtual meeting. I'm sure that if we had called a meeting for 100 people during a pandemic someone would have attempted to use that against the board. But then, I'm fairly cynical. Agreed but this is October. I watched Weston v Bath Saturday, and there were a lot more than 100 people there
|
|