|
Post by A Source (aka Angry Badger) on Jun 10, 2022 15:30:12 GMT
Will this mean that our fitness levels will be less of an advantage as teams will have more fresh legs towards the end of games
|
|
|
Post by eastville1966 on Jun 10, 2022 15:36:45 GMT
Will probably mean more opportunities for timewasting by introducing subs every minute or so during the last 5 minutes of a match…..
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jun 10, 2022 15:51:11 GMT
There will be three periods when you can make subs and you can also make subs at halftime and this won't count as one of the three periods.
|
|
|
Post by kruger on Jun 10, 2022 16:07:24 GMT
Hopefully no subs allowed in the last 5 minutes unless of course its us
|
|
|
Post by kampucheagas on Jun 10, 2022 16:13:41 GMT
Anyone else think 3 subs is more than enough??
Surely favours the bigger clubs with bigger squads??
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 10, 2022 16:19:47 GMT
Will this mean that our fitness levels will be less of an advantage as teams will have more fresh legs towards the end of games Will our "fitness" levels even be a factor in L1, where most team more professional than L2? What frustrates me is the latest trend for players how are just about to be subbed to feign injury, to waste even more time when their side isn't losing.
|
|
|
Post by It's a song on Jun 10, 2022 16:20:58 GMT
Will this mean that our fitness levels will be less of an advantage as teams will have more fresh legs towards the end of games Will our "fitness" levels even be a factor in L1, where most team more professional than L2? What frustrates me is the latest trend for players how are just about to be subbed to feign injury, to waste even more time when their side isn't losing. I think a stop-clock would be a great idea. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61342349
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 10, 2022 16:22:19 GMT
Anyone else think 3 subs is more than enough?? Surely favours the bigger clubs with bigger squads?? Aren't squad numbers now restricted? I'd imagine that like last season we'll have a full squad of 1st team player anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Charlton Hayes Gas on Jun 10, 2022 16:26:09 GMT
I have no problem with 5 subs, providing refs have the bottle To tell players with supposed injuries to get off the pitch where they can be assessed by a physio as to whether they’ll go off injured or not.
The amount of time wasting in the game now is infuriating.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2022 16:57:25 GMT
Well I don't like it as too many changes just wreck the flow of the game.
|
|
|
Post by gasandelectricity on Jun 10, 2022 17:28:45 GMT
I have no problem with 5 subs, providing refs have the bottle To tell players with supposed injuries to get off the pitch where they can be assessed by a physio as to whether they’ll go off injured or not. The amount of time wasting in the game now is infuriating. This. 5 subs can make the game more exciting. 2 more opportunities to water around wasting time not so much.
|
|
|
Post by percy on Jun 10, 2022 17:55:49 GMT
3 sub opportunities maximum (plus HT) so can’t make 4 or 5 individual subs anyway
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jun 10, 2022 18:23:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jun 10, 2022 20:15:47 GMT
Why has this been introduced? Thought it was a temporary measure during Covid when so many games were being postponed and a fixture backlog and lots of matches close together threatened.
I'm not sure why, but I'm suspicious about the motives behind a 'temporary' rule which turns out later to become a permanent one, and I end up questioning whether the official reason at the time was a smokescreen and excuse for a secretly planned rule change.
Having said that, and being in danger of sounding like a conspiracy theorist nutter, I can't think of any reasons why it is an evil plot designed to make the big boys richer and us poorer.
|
|
yattongas
Proper Gas
Posts: 13,798
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Jun 10, 2022 21:06:59 GMT
Why has this been introduced? Thought it was a temporary measure during Covid when so many games were being postponed and a fixture backlog and lots of matches close together threatened. I'm not sure why, but I'm suspicious about the motives behind a 'temporary' rule which turns out later to become a permanent one, and I end up questioning whether the official reason at the time was a smokescreen and excuse for a secretly planned rule change. Having said that, and being in danger of sounding like a conspiracy theorist nutter, I can't think of any reasons why it is an evil plot designed to make the big boys richer and us poorer. Think you’ve nailed it . Massively favours clubs with bigger budgets. It’s always about the money.
|
|
|
Post by Qatar Gas on Jun 11, 2022 7:19:50 GMT
Will probably mean more opportunities for timewasting by introducing subs every minute or so during the last 5 minutes of a match….. Last time it was allowed, we’re you only able to make subs on three occasions? That’ll help prevent teams from trying to bring on one sub every minute for the five minutes of injury time!
|
|
|
Post by Quarters on Jun 11, 2022 7:57:30 GMT
Will probably mean more opportunities for timewasting by introducing subs every minute or so during the last 5 minutes of a match….. Last time it was allowed, we’re you only able to make subs on three occasions? That’ll help prevent teams from trying to bring on one sub every minute for the five minutes of injury time! Someone has stated substitutions to be made in three slots not including half time. Whigh means you could have made three separate substitutions and then get someone carried off and have to complete the game with 10. Apart from concussion substitutions. Juse imagine that scenario when a keeper has to go off but you can't replace him even though you have not used 5 subs.
|
|
|
Post by playtowin on Jun 11, 2022 8:13:31 GMT
Its to make the game play faster and more energy filled. Need to keep those will short attention spans engaged...oi ! Pay attention stop looking out of the window.
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Jun 11, 2022 18:57:24 GMT
Anyone else think 3 subs is more than enough?? Surely favours the bigger clubs with bigger squads?? The entire structure of everything is to benefit bigger clubs. I remember when we used to develop players and sell them on to bigger clubs, rather than develop loanees and then buy them off big clubs if they weren’t good enough. It’s why I don’t buy sky or watch any of the Harlem globetrotter clubs, who have the United Nations of squads while pretending to be a club from Manchester or Liverpool. I suppose their stadiums are there, but they could quite easily move them. Oh and all those “die hard” supporters who’ve never visited the city and just are overgrown glory hunter children. Seriously, screw them. I hate them, and I don’t really like the England team either these days, they have about as much character as a blank sheet of paper and they are managed by a cringeworthy PE teacher.
|
|
|
Post by Baxtinho on Jun 12, 2022 9:34:36 GMT
Not speaking from any position of knowledge or experience at all, but given the make up of our home kit - I'd have guessed it'd be one of the higher contrast kits so less likely to clash. An old pal of mine used to struggle with reds, greens and browns looking similar to him so assume our dark and white would be ok. Obviously happy to be corrected by anyone with some knowledge of visual impairments.
|
|