|
Post by bidefordgas on Aug 2, 2022 14:01:24 GMT
The club has been fined for the pitch invasions during and at the end of the Scunthorpe game.
|
|
|
Post by dudelebowski on Aug 2, 2022 14:06:04 GMT
At the end?
Absolutely pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by rusho'gas on Aug 2, 2022 14:13:04 GMT
Bristol Rovers has been fined £16,500 and warned for two breaches of FA Rule E20.1 and E20.2 that occurred during their EFL League Two fixture against Scunthorpe United FC on Saturday 7 May 2022.
Rovers admitted that it failed to ensure that its spectators, and all persons purporting to be its supporters or followers, conducted themselves in an orderly fashion and refrained from using threatening and violent behaviour whilst encroaching onto the pitch area, in the 85th minute of the fixture.
The club also admitted it failed to ensure that its spectators, and all persons purporting to be its supporters or followers, conducted themselves in an orderly fashion at the conclusion of the fixture.
The sanction was imposed by an independent Regulatory Commission during a subsequent hearing.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 2, 2022 14:14:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kruger on Aug 2, 2022 14:15:02 GMT
Ok so to everyone who ran on the pitch do the right thing and pay towards it, it isn't fair that Wael pays it, you the ones who ran on the pitch are at fault, you know who you are do the right thing and pay
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Aug 2, 2022 14:17:21 GMT
It'll be interesting to see how much Oldham and Everton are fined.
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Aug 2, 2022 14:17:32 GMT
It'll be interesting to see how much Oldham and Everton are fined.
|
|
|
Post by Quarters on Aug 2, 2022 14:23:31 GMT
We impose a penalty which reflects the totality of the two incidents of misconduct. The first incident was particularly serious. Having regard all the matters set out including the fact that was a League 2 club at the time, the appropriate starting point is, in our view, a financial penalty of £25,000. Taking into account the mitigation including its ‘guilty pleas’ we reduce that to a fine of £16,500.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 2, 2022 14:23:31 GMT
4. The context for the disturbances is that the Club had to better their Promotion rivals
score (Northampton Town) by five goals to secure automatic promotion to League 1. In
advance of the match prospects of that happening were remote.
5. The context for the two charges of misconduct is as follows. The referee reported that in
the 77th minute, after the Club scored its fifth goal, a smoke device had been released by
a fan or fans located in the West Stand. Stewards acted quickly and dealt with the
situation before he restarted the game.
6. In the 79th minute of play after the Club scored its sixth goal a further smoke device was
released by its supporters in the North Stand. This device was thrown over the perimeter
barrier and landed on the grassed area behind the goal. Simultaneously, eight-ten of its
supporters located in the North Stand left the terrace by climbing over the barrier and
entered the grassed area behind the goal to celebrate the goal. Another two fans located
in the East Stand left the terrace by climbing over the barrier and entered the technical
area. Stewards removed the fans as quickly as possible and the referee spoke with the
Club captain and asked him to speak to his manager to try and calm the supporters down
so the game could resume.
7. The first incursion was the reaction of part of the crowd to scoring its seventh goal to
make the score 7 v 0. The goal was scored in the 85th minute of the match. That goal if
the score remained as it then was, secured promotion. It was the catalyst for what
followed immediately thereafter. Players celebrated in front of the home supporters
behind the goal in the Thatchers North Stand. In his statement the referee said this:
“However this ignited Bristol Rovers FC spectators into a major pitch invasion entering the field of
play from the Thatchers North Stand, the Somelap West Terrace & Poplar Insurance Terrace
approx. 500 plus spectators entered the field of play with several smoke devices being utilised.”
8. What is clear is that the seventh goal caused home supporters to celebrate exuberantly
and some entered the field of play. In consequence of the ‘pitch invasion’ the referee
stopped the match and took the players from the field of play. The referee said:
“Due to the large number of spectators on the field of play celebrating with the Bristol Rovers FC
players, there were also a large number of Bristol Rovers FC spectators goading/ insulting the
Scunthorpe United FC players. With players safety my main responsibility/ focus for both Bristol
Rovers FC & Scunthorpe United FC, I blew my whistle & pointed towards the tunnel to remove
the players to allow the Bristol Rovers FC stewards/ Police an opportunity to remove the Bristol
Rovers FC spectators from the field of play. Whilst leaving the field of play, the Scunthorpe United
FC goal Owen Foster informed me that he had been assaulted by a Bristol Rovers spectator in front
of his colleague Liam Feeney, no match official witnessed the incident.”
9. There were no statements from Owen Foster or Liam Feeney. The referee’s report states
that Foster told him he was a pushed by a spectator and a clenched fist made “contact
with his neck/jaw”.
10. Scunthorpe United FC submitted to The FA a letter dated 19 May 2022. The letter said
this about the assault:
“At this point, one of our players – a 17-year-old goalkeeper – is goaded, abused and then assaulted
by a home supporter as he is attempting to leave the field of play due to the pitch invasion.”
40. In the CCTV footage provided it appears principally to be filming the actual game itself
(until the incursion) and not concentrating, as it should, on the areas where, given the
previous incidents that the referee reported on in the 77th and 79th minute, it should have been.
41. Further, as part of the 2019 Action Plan the Club was directed that CCTV Operators
shall receive enhanced training on the use of CCTV systems and identification of
“potential match day offenders”. Based on the footage provided to us, there is little
evidence that has been effective if provided.
|
|
|
Post by Big Jock on Aug 2, 2022 14:24:07 GMT
Phew! Pretty small fine tbf 👍🏼 Let’s be honest wit ourselves here folks, we was fortunate th match wasnae abandoned an we missed out on an incredible promotion !
|
|
|
Post by Quarters on Aug 2, 2022 14:25:44 GMT
But some will say, what about.............
Things elsewhere are no excuse, just look at the facts regarding us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2022 14:29:17 GMT
It'll be interesting to see how much Oldham and Everton are fined. Do they have history of pitch invasions like we do? The report was very clear about our past record.
|
|
|
Post by Iliveinbidefordgas on Aug 2, 2022 14:29:49 GMT
All those who went on pitch 85th min Time to open your wallets pay up?? I wont hold my breath mind you 🤔
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Aug 2, 2022 14:32:01 GMT
With plenty of cctv coverage of Port Vale fans attacking Swindon players I await the outcome of that incursion. Surely must incur a higher penalty than ours.
|
|
|
Post by eric on Aug 2, 2022 14:41:45 GMT
If I was Wael I’d put all drinks prices up until the fine is recovered.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 2, 2022 14:42:02 GMT
With plenty of cctv coverage of Port Vale fans attacking Swindon players I await the outcome of that incursion. Surely must incur a higher penalty than ours. part of our punishment revolves around the poor CCTV as it was too busy filming the match
|
|
|
Post by bluebiro on Aug 2, 2022 14:53:56 GMT
If I was Wael I’d put all drinks prices up until the fine is recovered. that will take a long time now they only seem to let 10 fans into the blackthorn bar
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Aug 2, 2022 14:56:38 GMT
With plenty of cctv coverage of Port Vale fans attacking Swindon players I await the outcome of that incursion. Surely must incur a higher penalty than ours. part of our punishment revolves around the poor CCTV as it was too busy filming the match That begs the question how many clubs have cctv that only films the crowds. None I would suggest as you would have to have banks of cameras all round the ground with umpteen people sat watching screens in the control room. It would appear that most evidence of these incursions comes from the footage of the actual games, during and at the end as in the case of the Forest v Sheff utd incidents and not from club cctv.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 2, 2022 15:00:54 GMT
part of our punishment revolves around the poor CCTV as it was too busy filming the match That begs the question how many clubs have cctv that only films the crowds. None I would suggest as you would have to have banks of cameras all round the ground with umpteen people sat watching screens in the control room. It would appear that most evidence of these incursions comes from the footage of the actual games, during and at the end as in the case of the Forest v Sheff utd incidents and not from club cctv. Plus what would better CCTV have actually achieved, given the culprit who attacked the goalie was still identified and charged? It's under to understand why Rovers have been charged & fined but the likes of Oldham, Sheff Utd & Port Vale seemed to have escaped with no action being taken. Plus Man C fans were clearly letting off pyros on the pitch.
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Aug 2, 2022 15:09:31 GMT
That begs the question how many clubs have cctv that only films the crowds. None I would suggest as you would have to have banks of cameras all round the ground with umpteen people sat watching screens in the control room. It would appear that most evidence of these incursions comes from the footage of the actual games, during and at the end as in the case of the Forest v Sheff utd incidents and not from club cctv. Plus what would better CCTV have actually achieved, given the culprit who attacked the goalie was still identified and charged? It's under to understand why Rovers have been charged & fined but the likes of Oldham, Sheff Utd & Port Vale seemed to have escaped with no action being taken. Plus Man C fans were clearly letting off pyros on the pitch. It would appear if the ref does not report a pitch invasion, no action is taken. If that's not the case, loads of clubs would surely be fined during a season. I watched all the playoff games on Sky and there were invasions in all of them bar the finals. Fulham, Bournemouth fans and others invading before the seasons end when their promotions confirmed etc etc etc. The list is endless.
|
|