|
|
Post by mftc on Feb 23, 2015 13:48:19 GMT
Does anyone know if we have any clauses in place if Derby (Santos) or Middlesboro (Carayoll) get into the Premiership?
|
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Feb 23, 2015 14:38:51 GMT
I believe that NH has followed in GD footsteps by insisting on these clauses for every player transferred, who has any potential.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 15:21:59 GMT
It is standard procedure to have that clause inserted when any player is sold
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 16:29:37 GMT
Is Carayol even fit yet? Has been out all season from what I remember with a cruciate injury.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 23, 2015 16:35:32 GMT
He's just recovered from his ACL injury, whilst we had a clauses inserted in these players contracts would it apply if they only played an handful of games this season, or is there a minimun amount of games they need to play before the clause kicks in?
|
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Feb 23, 2015 16:39:19 GMT
So when Lambert moves on do we get all the clauses for him (rumor he is going back to Southampton)
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 23, 2015 19:17:19 GMT
Surely we'll only get what clauses he's already triggered/a percentage of any sell on fee which could well be zero if he does go backs to the Saints?
|
|
|
|
Post by lincsblue on Feb 23, 2015 19:50:31 GMT
Sell on clauses only follow on if the second selling club had a sell-on clause themselves,
Eg Chelsea had one for Sinclair, so when he went from Swansea to Citeh, we gained a percentage of their percentage that Chelsea earnt from the Swansea profit
However, can't imagine Southampton put a sell-on clause in to Lambert's move to Liverpool - and even if they did, Liverpool would still need to make a profit on their £4M investment cost
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 23, 2015 21:21:31 GMT
I'm afraid your talking nonsense as somebody has already suggested there's appearance money etc, hence why he only cost £4m.
|
|
|
|
Post by lincsblue on Feb 24, 2015 0:46:22 GMT
Not nonsense at all, I'm only talking about money (profit) from any selling on of a player that was ours two oe even 3 clubs back.
*Have edited my post to insert "sell-on" in a few places*
|
|
|
|
Post by lincsblue on Feb 24, 2015 1:02:12 GMT
I'm afraid your talking nonsense as somebody has already suggested there's appearance money etc, hence why he only cost £4m. We would only get appearance money for his Southampton career. IF Southampton have an appearance clause in the Liverpool deal, I'd be surprised if it had been met yet with only 5 League starts |
|
