|
Post by stevek192 on Mar 15, 2015 0:29:09 GMT
Well that was certainly a point gained given we were 2-0 down but how many more times is DC going to have to use all three substitutions because of wrong team selection and tactics to start with? It is about time that he selected a team to start based on the team that FINISHED the last game and one that actually looks likely to win the game. When all three substitutes had been used today we finally looked like we had a team where the players actually wanted the ball and were capable of holding on to the thing. First half was a total nightmare where Halifax scored from pretty well their only two real chances and both should have been prevented.The first the defender should have been marking the scorer but in all honesty the tactics employed meant that similar to last week when forwards drop off our defenders allow them to move unmarked and then the defence are 3 yards too deep. The three at the back get dragged everywhere rather than be up close and marking their players, The two wide players Leadbitter and Brown both looked lost in the first half and the midfield three of Clarke, Mansell and Lines also played far too deep. I would personally say that DC has been "found out" by his opponent counterparts in the last two games
Mildenhall 5 Still looking a shadow of his former self. Seemed to move far too slow to the first (though I may be being harsh on him and will need to see the goal again) and was caught in no mans land for the second although there appeared to be three queries over this goal-a) the free kick to start with b)looked offside and c) there appeared to be a foul on our defender. Mind you the referee was awful all game and a "homer" His distribution was poor in general.
Leadbitter 5 Not a winger and never will be but at full back he is improving and made a great tackle to prevent Halifax regaining the lead after our equaliser. We need to play proper wingers and Lockyer and Leadbitter should be fighting for the full back position with Leadbitter being the better option at the moment due to his pace.
McCrystal 5 Caught out on a number of occasions and allowed his opponent far too much room.Needs to lead the side again and stop us looking disorganised at the back
Parkes 6 Not at his very best but certainly brought the ball out far more assured than McCrystal and passed the ball reasonably well considering the playing surface
Lockyer 4.5 Has limitations and the pitch did not help his cause when it came to passing. Looks in need of a rest to regenerate the batteries and is starting to look a bit ragged by Clarke's questionable tactics with starting with three at the back.
Brown 6 Far better second half than first half and improvement summed up with a belter of an opening goal that in the late Colin Howlett's words gave the keeper "no chance at all"
Mansell 5 Has looked below his best since he has been trying to avoid the punishable 10th Booking. Take away the tigerish tackles and you are left with an ordinary player particularly when played in a very defensive side. Stupid booking for dissent means he misses two games. To his credit you can't fault his effort and he was always trying to start attacks and should have scored a winner close to the end.
Clarke 3 Sorry but I just can't see why he gets selected as he looks out of his depth and not creative enough to warrant a place in the team and not good enough defensively to challenge Mansell. A place on the bench at best. His only worthwhile contribution was a fierce shot in the first half that the keeper saved well.
Lines 5 A tough debut for him given the state of the pitch but needs to be at the centre of everything in midfield and allowed the freedom to dictate the pace of the game. looked far better second half when the substitutions were made and better players made themselves available to receive the ball. Deliveries were ok and I am sure he has a big part to play in the remaining games. He assisted on the second goal.
Taylor 4 Should have come away with at least one goal and probably two. He is a good footballer but not such a good striker. DC cannot afford to start him at the moment now he has Easter available as IMO his misses are becoming very costly to the team.
Monkhouse 4 I thought after the Lincoln game that he could do a good job as a targetman but certainly today he did not have a good game other than creating two good moves in the first half that could have provided goals. Was guilty of missing an open goal but not sure what the score was at that time.
Substitutions
Harrison 7 Another very important goal and a very good one at that that was one of the best scored this season. Showed some good aerial power and some lovely touches. Would start him with Easter next game.
Balanta 5.5 Did nothing outstanding but showed good control and neat touches but deserves a run of games because we look a lot better when he is on the pitch and he has the confidence to do something with the ball.
Easter 6 Same as Balanta showed good touches in and around the box and held the ball well. Must start every game now as we need a striker with a proven record.
DC 4 Main marks are for making the changes rather than his selection or tactics which were both found wanting today. Seems to be getting very Wardish in his team selection and seems very unsure what formation he wants to play. I feel that opponents are now fully aware of how he sets the team up and are doing a good job of making things very difficult for us. I am of the opinion that making substitutions is an art but regularly having to make 2 or 3 to try to save a game is proving that the team selected at the start was incorrect.
Referee 2 That is being generous!!!
It was great to have 4 players of the ability of Dawson,Balanta,Easter and Harrison on the bench today but my worry is that 80% of the teams in this league would jump at the chance of having these players in their side whereas I am not convinced that a very high percentage of the teams would want the players that were taken off today. It seems strange to have four attackers on the bench at an away game and it was unfortunate for Dawson that he was not given any game time. This is just my opinion and others will feel differently as I would much prefer to play further up the pitch and attack teams. IMO we are now paying every team we play too much respect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 1:14:51 GMT
I do wonder if DC's game plan has been to absorb pressure from sides and let them wear themselves down relying on our superior fitness to win the game in the final third, which works well if you can prevent them scoring untill that time. The trouble today and last week wast that our usually solid defence and goalkeeper were breached early on and there isn't a plan b. I think Balanta, Easter and Harrison are only effectiive as impact subs each for different reasons. The problem is we just do not have the forwards to open teams up early in the game so we have to rely on wearing teams down.
|
|
|
Post by jonjames on Mar 15, 2015 4:46:52 GMT
Well that was certainly a point gained given we were 2-0 down but how many more times is DC going to have to use all three substitutions because of wrong team selection and tactics to start with? It is about time that he selected a team to start based on the team that FINISHED the last game and one that actually looks likely to win the game. When all three substitutes had been used today we finally looked like we had a team where the players actually wanted the ball and were capable of holding on to the thing. First half was a total nightmare where Halifax scored from pretty well their only two real chances and both should have been prevented.The first the defender should have been marking the scorer but in all honesty the tactics employed meant that similar to last week when forwards drop off our defenders allow them to move unmarked and then the defence are 3 yards too deep. The three at the back get dragged everywhere rather than be up close and marking their players, The two wide players Leadbitter and Brown both looked lost in the first half and the midfield three of Clarke, Mansell and Lines also played far too deep. I would personally say that DC has been "found out" by his opponent counterparts in the last two games Mildenhall 5 Still looking a shadow of his former self. Seemed to move far too slow to the first (though I may be being harsh on him and will need to see the goal again) and was caught in no mans land for the second although there appeared to be three queries over this goal-a) the free kick to start with b)looked offside and c) there appeared to be a foul on our defender. Mind you the referee was awful all game and a "homer" His distribution was poor in general. Leadbitter 5 Not a winger and never will be but at full back he is improving and made a great tackle to prevent Halifax regaining the lead after our equaliser. We need to play proper wingers and Lockyer and Leadbitter should be fighting for the full back position with Leadbitter  being the better option at the moment due to his pace.
McCrystal 5 Caught out on a number of occasions and allowed his opponent far too much room.Needs to lead the side again and stop us looking disorganised at the back
Parkes 6 Not at his very best but certainly brought the ball out far more assured than McCrystal and passed the ball reasonably well considering the playing surface
Lockyer 4.5 Has limitations and the pitch did not help his cause when it came to passing. Looks in need of a rest to regenerate the batteries and is starting to look a bit ragged by Clarke's questionable tactics with starting with three at the back.
Brown 6 Far better second half than first half and improvement summed up with a belter of an opening goal that in the late Colin Howlett's words gave the keeper "no chance at all"
Mansell 5 Has looked below his best since he has been trying to avoid the punishable 10th Booking. Take away the tigerish tackles and you are left with an ordinary player particularly when played in a very defensive side. Stupid booking for dissent means he misses two games. To his credit you can't fault his effort and he was always trying to start attacks and should have scored a winner close to the end.
Clarke 3 Sorry but I just can't see why he gets selected as he looks out of his depth and not creative enough to warrant a place in the team and not good enough defensively to challenge Mansell. A place on the bench at best. His only worthwhile contribution was a fierce shot in the first half that the keeper saved well.
Lines 5 A tough debut for him given the state of the pitch but needs to be at the centre of everything in midfield and allowed the freedom to dictate the pace of the game. looked far better second half when the substitutions were made and better players made themselves available to receive the ball. Deliveries were ok and I am sure he has a big part to play in the remaining games. He assisted on the second goal.
Taylor 4 Should have come away with at least one goal and probably two. He is a good footballer but not such a good striker. DC cannot afford to start him at the moment now he has Easter available as IMO his misses are becoming very costly to the team.
Monkhouse 4 I thought after the Lincoln game that he could do a good job as a targetman but certainly today he did not have a good game other than creating two good moves in the first half that could have provided goals. Was guilty of missing an open goal but not sure what the score was at that time.
Substitutions
Harrison 7 Another very important goal and a very good one at that that was one of the best scored this season. Showed some good aerial power and some lovely touches. Would start him with Easter next game.
Balanta 5.5 Did nothing outstanding but showed good control and neat touches but deserves a run of games because we look a lot better when he is on the pitch and he has the confidence to do something with the ball.
Easter 6 Same as Balanta showed good touches in and around the box and held the ball well. Must start every game now as we need a striker with a proven record.
DC 4 Main marks are for making the changes rather than his selection or tactics which were both found wanting today. Seems to be getting very Wardish in his team selection and seems very unsure what formation he wants to play. I feel that opponents are now fully aware of how he sets the team up and are doing a good job of making things very difficult for us. I am of the opinion that making substitutions is an art but regularly having to make 2 or 3 to try to save a game is proving that the team selected at the start was incorrect.Â
Referee 2 That is being generous!!!
It was great to have 4 players of the ability of Dawson,Balanta,Easter and Harrison on the bench today but my worry is that 80% of the teams in this league would jump at the chance of having these players in their side whereas I am not convinced that a very high percentage of the teams would want the players that were taken off today. It seems strange to have four attackers on the bench at an away game and it was unfortunate for Dawson that he was not given any game time. This is just my opinion and others will feel differently as I would much prefer to play further up the pitch and attack teams. IMO we are now paying every team we play too much respect.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Â
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 15, 2015 8:31:01 GMT
Surely Balanta & Dawson are as good as it gets in this division for wearing teams down?
The problem is DC's setting us up so defensively our attackers get little chance to shine until the last 30 mins or so, when we go on the attack.
Although things are not helped by Blisset now looking a poor signing and Easter being out injured for so long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 8:45:01 GMT
Surely Balanta & Dawson are as good as it gets in this division for wearing teams down? The problem is DC's setting us up so defensively our attackers get little chance to shine until the last 30 mins or so, when we go on the attack. Although things are not helped by Blisset now looking a poor signing and Easter being out injured for so long. Not sure Balanta can do a full game Dawson definately and I can't understand why he isn't starting. Easter looked good when he came on, but he is carrying a bit of weight which limits his mobility.
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Mar 15, 2015 9:34:06 GMT
Surely Balanta & Dawson are as good as it gets in this division for wearing teams down? The problem is DC's setting us up so defensively our attackers get little chance to shine until the last 30 mins or so, when we go on the attack. Although things are not helped by Blisset now looking a poor signing and Easter being out injured for so long. I'm not sure I agree with Blisset looking a poor signing. For whatever reason he didn't make the squad yesterday but our stats with him in the starting line-up are played 15, won 9, drawn 6, lost 0, so he can't be that bad! I'm sure he still has a big part to play in the rest of our season.
|
|
|
Post by cookinongas on Mar 15, 2015 9:56:27 GMT
The pitch yesterday was disgraceful. It was like playing on weston beach and I think Dawson and Balanta would not have been able to play their game cos the ball wouldn't roll. Saying that all 4 goals were scored in the same goal and i did think that looking at the pitch at half time one half looked much better than the other condition wise. That could have been due to the fact most of the play was in Halifax half during the first 45 mins and as already been said their two goals were about the only two attempts. The referee was one of the worst i have ever seen, and iv'e seen some crap ones in 50 years. He definately was a "homer" with a big wedge in his back pocket maybe!!
|
|
|
Post by tumshie on Mar 15, 2015 11:40:14 GMT
Dc has been in charge for a year now and i think we can safely say his style is not to go all out from the start for a win. I can't see that changing, and in fairness its got us in contention for the title. So that said i think we need to tighten up at the back again, our season has been built on being difficult to beat and snatching the winner, and with Ellis in goalscoring mode, Easter getting fitter, Balanta looking able etc we've certainly got match winners in the squad.
I think DC's main concern this week will be more about mus conceding 4 goals in 2 games (very unlike us) than scoring bag fulls going forward.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Mar 15, 2015 12:16:24 GMT
Thanks for the write up, much appreciated.
Bags.
|
|
|
Post by stokegiffordgas on Mar 15, 2015 12:44:54 GMT
I was there yesterday and can't argue with what has been said, we certainly do give the opposition too much respect encouraging them to have a go at us and increasing their (likely) initial low confidence levels. Yesterday also epitomised why we have to get out of the conference this season - that sort of pitch does not allow you to play football although we did try and that referee did not have a clue how to officiate a game of football. At best he was guessing and at worst he was biased, either way it was embarrassing and not sure where the football league expects to get its next generation of referees from as I can't recall one this season that looked the part.
|
|
|
Post by stapletongas on Mar 15, 2015 13:08:21 GMT
I was surprised to see 3-5-2 yesterday, while it swamps the midfield, it robs you of width in the final third, unless the full back genuinely can run the full channel and really push on.
Choosing a system based on the players at your disposal is sound theory, as opposed to shoehorning players into a system you feel you want to play. Play what your players do best. We are a 4-4-2 with good cover for all positions.
Last 7 games, we need to play to our strengths, do what we do best, let the opposition worry about us more than us worrying about them and do to everyone what Eastleigh did to us, take the game by the scruff of the neck with opposition not knowing what hit them. We've got the players and I wouldn't swap with any of our competitors.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Mar 15, 2015 15:04:28 GMT
Surely Balanta & Dawson are as good as it gets in this division for wearing teams down? The problem is DC's setting us up so defensively our attackers get little chance to shine until the last 30 mins or so, when we go on the attack. Although things are not helped by Blisset now looking a poor signing and Easter being out injured for so long. I'm not sure I agree with Blisset looking a poor signing. For whatever reason he didn't make the squad yesterday but our stats with him in the starting line-up are played 15, won 9, drawn 6, lost 0, so he can't be that bad! I'm sure he still has a big part to play in the rest of our season. From what you've seen, what's your opinion on Blissett ? Stats don't tell you everything - e.g. weaker opposition, team in better from etc.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Mar 15, 2015 15:10:16 GMT
I was surprised to see 3-5-2 yesterday, while it swamps the midfield, it robs you of width in the final third, unless the full back genuinely can run the full channel and really push on. Choosing a system based on the players at your disposal is sound theory, as opposed to shoehorning players into a system you feel you want to play. Play what your players do best. We are a 4-4-2 with good cover for all positions. Last 7 games, we need to play to our strengths, do what we do best, let the opposition worry about us more than us worrying about them and do to everyone what Eastleigh did to us, take the game by the scruff of the neck with opposition not knowing what hit them. We've got the players and I wouldn't swap with any of our competitors. Exactly, I think managers over-complicate things - pressure/anxiety call it what you want. I think, Barnet are strong favourites. We REALLY should go to win every game now (from the start), even v Macc. We are pretty much assured play off place so not so much to lose and now we have better attacking players than at any time of the season - Dawson, Balanta, Lines, Easter and Harrison (finding his shooting boots !!). FFS Clarke - take the game to the opposition !!! Don't expect it I'm afraid to say - think he's feeling the pressure and his chopping and changing of formations and certain players has spread to the team
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 15:15:14 GMT
I'm not sure I agree with Blisset looking a poor signing. For whatever reason he didn't make the squad yesterday but our stats with him in the starting line-up are played 15, won 9, drawn 6, lost 0, so he can't be that bad! I'm sure he still has a big part to play in the rest of our season. From what you've seen, what's your opinion on Blissett ? Stats don't tell you everything - e.g. weaker opposition, team in better from etc. My opinion on Blissett is bambi on ice
|
|
socrates
Proper Gas
Posts: 12,475
Member is Online
|
Post by socrates on Mar 15, 2015 15:34:38 GMT
From what you've seen, what's your opinion on Blissett ? Stats don't tell you everything - e.g. weaker opposition, team in better from etc. My opinion on Blissett is bambi on ice I agree but sometimes having Bambi on ice up front for you can be pretty effective if not pretty. We haven't lost when he's started.
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Mar 15, 2015 15:54:47 GMT
As regards Blissett I think he can be an awkward customer however what I do question is the part Marcus Stewart plays in coaching the strikers because since he has been in the position I see no real influence that he seems to have on them. I do however see an influence that Yates has had as regards coaching the team. Blissett looked far better playing against us than when he has played for us but is this down to our defenders not tight enough to opposition forwards. I really am not sure as both Eastleigh and Halifax yesterday caused our central defenders problems due to their movement off the ball.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Mar 15, 2015 16:34:14 GMT
As regards Blissett I think he can be an awkward customer however what I do question is the part Marcus Stewart plays in coaching the strikers because since he has been in the position I see no real influence that he seems to have on them. I do however see an influence that Yates has had as regards coaching the team. Blissett looked far better playing against us than when he has played for us but is this down to our defenders not tight enough to opposition forwards. I really am not sure as both Eastleigh and Halifax yesterday caused our central defenders problems due to their movement off the ball. Syewart as a player was all about movement. Taylor has that in spades, Blisset needs someone to teach him how to use his body. If anything Harrison is possibly the one who has benefited from any coaching from Stewy. Dont think you can teach people to finish
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Mar 15, 2015 21:31:51 GMT
From what you've seen, what's your opinion on Blissett ? Stats don't tell you everything - e.g. weaker opposition, team in better from etc. My opinion on Blissett is bambi on ice I agree. He also doesn't use his height effectively, his starting position when he jumps is to crouch a lot ?? He should also be stronger, more physical. Do not think he makes intelligent runs either when without the ball. Not a bad finisher, however.
|
|