Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2015 12:26:51 GMT
My prediction. Sainsbury will offer Bristol Rovers a non disclosed settlement figure. Gasheads will only speculate but never know. We will not get UWE and Mr Higgs will ride off into the sunset on Monday morning after we narrowly lose to Grimsby. The pictures of UWE will remain in the supporters club bar leaving fans of the future to point and ask what fantasy land those hi def photos were taken in and where did all those fans go? Sigh. Thank god I don't live in your house! I've thanked him.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on May 15, 2015 12:26:52 GMT
If our QC says that it is still running then surely there can't be a time limit to the terms being met?
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on May 15, 2015 12:27:28 GMT
No real surprises there then, it will be interesting to know what conditions weren't apparently met and whether that was down to Sainsbury's delaying tactics or not?
|
|
|
Post by xplosivgas on May 15, 2015 12:30:35 GMT
Our man looks to be an experienced campaigner with a few tricks in his locker - www.ftb.eu.com/members/david-matthias-qc.asp
And it's nice that he considers us his most prestigious client in recent times (based on the fact BRFC is mentioned first in the list!!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2015 12:31:03 GMT
Will be interested to hear from Severncider re. the mood in the courtroom, body language, dirty looks from the Lady Judge etc.
|
|
|
Post by fanboy on May 15, 2015 12:32:33 GMT
Our man looks to be an experienced campaigner with a few tricks in his locker - www.ftb.eu.com/members/david-matthias-qc.asp
And it's nice that he considers us his most prestigious client in recent times (based on the fact BRFC is mentioned first in the list!!) Go on the boys
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on May 15, 2015 12:35:20 GMT
Our man looks to be an experienced campaigner with a few tricks in his locker - www.ftb.eu.com/members/david-matthias-qc.asp
And it's nice that he considers us his most prestigious client in recent times (based on the fact BRFC is mentioned first in the list!!) It looks more like alphabetical order to me Bristol Rovers, Capita, Datasharp UK, West Ham United, Westminster City Council.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on May 15, 2015 12:38:03 GMT
Will be interested to hear from Severncider re. the mood in the courtroom, body language, dirty looks from the Lady Judge etc. Starting to think he has been locked up, or his battery has run out of juice already!
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on May 15, 2015 12:38:13 GMT
Sainsbury putting 11 men behind the ball. Higgs & Co struggling to open them up.
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on May 15, 2015 12:40:43 GMT
Sainsbury putting 11 men behind the ball. Higgs & Co struggling to open them up. They must have a WATERTIGHT defence as well.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on May 15, 2015 12:41:24 GMT
Sainsburys accuse Bristol rovers of scrabbling around last minute, trying to get planning terms changed after an agreed cut off date and so they had every right to terminate the contract.
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on May 15, 2015 12:42:32 GMT
Bristol rovers argue that sainsburys were obliged to carry on getting planning permission and that their cut off date didn't give them the right to walk away. Ultimately sainsburys did not act in good faith.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on May 15, 2015 12:45:05 GMT
New from the courtroom: Attachment DeletedWannacott for Sainsbury's is always on the lookout to make some money, this time by wriggling out of a deal. Attachment Deleted "Honest" David "Dai" Mathias is digging as deep as he can and trying not to enflame the gas.
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on May 15, 2015 12:58:07 GMT
Just spoke with our roving reporter. Sainsburys decision to call it off hinged on them getting a 12% return on their £30m investment. When they realised it would only be 7% return they had three choices. Walk away and endure the bad publicity. Build a smaller store and additional housing (which would achieve the 12% return) Sell to a competitor. They chose the first option. Rovers asked for confidential documentation of internal Sainsburys meetings to be disclosed to the court but the judge refused the application. Sainsburys insist that the contract date expired and they could walk away. However, apparently it is not so cut and dried as that, as apparently these contracts have a further time delay incorporated implicitly in them. With regard to the lawyers on this list, the judge admitted to the court that she has still not fully read the papers as she only picked them up a couple of days ago. In attendance are NH and Toni Watola. No Eddie Ware or his good lady. Severncider has just completed an interview with Points West. Court resumes at 2pm.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on May 15, 2015 13:05:14 GMT
Great, so they choose the worse option for us out of the 3! Although until the supermarket wars settle down how can they calculate returns will drop from 12% to 7%??
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 15, 2015 13:08:22 GMT
Great, so they choose the worse option for us out of the 3! Although until the supermarket wars settle down how can they calculate returns will drop from 12% to 7%?? 12% looks a bit high, even back in 2011 the Rise of the German Supermarkets was in full swing then
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2015 13:23:45 GMT
Was this 12% written into the contract, that is what it sounds like?
|
|
|
Post by RD on May 15, 2015 13:35:34 GMT
Great, so they choose the worse option for us out of the 3! Although until the supermarket wars settle down how can they calculate returns will drop from 12% to 7%?? What REALLY f**ks me of is that they're pulling out because they'll ONLY make 7% PROFIT I mean FFS. Greedy, Chuffing cnts!!!! I hope the judge sees right through them and orders them to pay £30m and £10m in compensation for Chuffing us about.
|
|
|
Post by gasant on May 15, 2015 13:48:35 GMT
Great, so they choose the worse option for us out of the 3! Although until the supermarket wars settle down how can they calculate returns will drop from 12% to 7%?? What REALLY f**ks me of is that they're pulling out because they'll ONLY make 7% PROFIT I mean FFS. Greedy, Chuffing cnts!!!! I hope the judge sees right through them and orders them to pay £30m and £10m in compensation for Chuffing us about. It's 7% return on investment per year I'd imagine. So would take 14 years to return the initial cost.
|
|
|
Post by Cantankerous Gas on May 15, 2015 13:49:02 GMT
|
|