|
Post by Big Jock on Jan 13, 2016 18:16:02 GMT
how the F##k would anyone or anything to do with oxford united know if matty taylor is flying to Edinburgh tomorrow.... honestly.... Fly to Edinbra!!!! We cannae organise a winger tae fly up the wing!
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jan 13, 2016 18:31:43 GMT
Stories doing the rounds at present include MT going to Oxford. Don't knock it peeps. The O/P is indeed correct i have it on good authority that MT will be included in the team for oxford you heard it here second
|
|
|
Post by gheadray on Jan 13, 2016 19:12:50 GMT
I do wonder if these rumours are referring to the wrong Taylor as Oxford were showing interest in Moore Taylor of EXETER ! Using a Twitter of MTaylor
|
|
|
Post by RD on Jan 13, 2016 19:49:29 GMT
I naer rated Taylor anyways, jes a big c0ck That's the main reason I rated him to be honest
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 19:50:39 GMT
I naer rated Taylor anyways, jes a big c0ck That's the main reason I rated him to be honest Ohhh errrrrr..... Lol
|
|
|
Post by banjogas on Jan 13, 2016 19:53:47 GMT
what's the going rate for a league 2 striker with 6 months left on his contract? He can leave for free in the summer.
I would be surprised if it was over 50k
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 13, 2016 19:55:20 GMT
Haven't we always sold players to balance the books? It's how lower league teams should be run. Muzzy aside it's a bloody long time since we had someone worth selling!! Actually Hugo, that's why lower league teams are lower league. You don't have to sell to break even.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:03:41 GMT
Haven't we always sold players to balance the books? It's how lower league teams should be run. Muzzy aside it's a bloody long time since we had someone worth selling!! Actually Hugo, that's why lower league teams are lower league. You don't have to sell to break even. Some teams like us have sold to break even, look at all of our big sales, all of them were players we bought. Other clubs are the opposite, get free-bies and move 'em on. I doubt many lower league teams break even.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:03:55 GMT
He was in Sainsbury's emerson green buying alot of dog food.
Make of that what you will....
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 13, 2016 20:04:41 GMT
Errrr well for one, we don't know if the Taylor rumours are true. And even if they are, he only has a contract until end of season. If he wants to go elsewhere he's easily gonna force it. It would suck but I can't see where your reference to the court case comes from. If a move is easily forced, why can't we get hold of Gaffney? He's in the same position. By the way, I didn't say it was cast iron, I'm asking the question. They are stories in circulation. Is this the same source of your "new beginning" thread the one you refused to divulge even though it was "all over" twitter? The only stories I've seen is the one thread on Oxford's forum, the one which suggested Oxford had offered to double MT's wages but we'd offered to match it, which hardly sounds like we want to cash on on MT to pay the court fees? At the end of the day if MT's decided he wants to move on then we can't stand in his way by paying OTT wages but you'd hope MT would show some loyalty as without us he'd still be playing non league football.
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 13, 2016 20:04:57 GMT
I cant still be the only person Who thinks gasincider has an agenda against Higgs can I? The only reason these "stories" are in circulation is because gasincider is starting them. We have been told that the appeal is costing hardly anything. Yet more bullshit from gasincider. Remember he has been telling us that we will hear something "any day soon" about the consortium for 4 months now. Every thread he starts is a sh** stirring exercise with no facts. Don't believe me? Have a look back at his threads. So I'm part of MT's family living in Oxford and ran the thread on their forum did l? Oh, hang on, no I'm a Hearts fan......blah blah blah No as I said at the start, these are stories in circulation at the moment and they hadn't been posted on here. Sorry to keep the upset ones in the loop. Personally I think we can do better than Taylor, but the problem is wages. Tubbs is on a lot more than Taylor, and won't come here for what he is on. Where is my anti Higgs agenda in all this? If we hadn't p*ssed so much up against the courtroom walls we would be making a profit and have no need to sell anyone. So does telling it as it is equate to an anti Higgs agenda? Come to think of it , it might well do. On the other hand it might be that I don't want us to chuck away a chance of promotion for the sake of a few quid to cover the court costs. But I guess some of you out there are happy about that.
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 13, 2016 20:07:21 GMT
Is this the same source of your "new beginning" thread the one you refused to divulge even though it was "all over" twitter? The only stories I've seen is the one thread on Oxford's forum, the one which suggested Oxford had offered to double MT's wages but we'd offered to match it, which hardly sounds like we want to cash on on MT to pay the court fees? At the end of the day if MT's decided he wants to move on then we can't stand in his way by paying OTT wages but you'd hope MT would show some loyalty as without us he'd still be playing non league football. I think you just answered your own question haven't you Topper?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:17:36 GMT
I cant still be the only person Who thinks gasincider has an agenda against Higgs can I? The only reason these "stories" are in circulation is because gasincider is starting them. We have been told that the appeal is costing hardly anything. Yet more bullshit from gasincider. Remember he has been telling us that we will hear something "any day soon" about the consortium for 4 months now. Every thread he starts is a sh** stirring exercise with no facts. Don't believe me? Have a look back at his threads. So I'm part of MT's family living in Oxford and ran the thread on their forum did l? Oh, hang on, no I'm a Hearts fan......blah blah blah No as I said at the start, these are stories in circulation at the moment and they hadn't been posted on here. Sorry to keep the upset ones in the loop. Personally I think we can do better than Taylor, but the problem is wages. Tubbs is on a lot more than Taylor, and won't come here for what he is on. Where is my anti Higgs agenda in all this? If we hadn't p*ssed so much up against the courtroom walls we would be making a profit and have no need to sell anyone. So does telling it as it is equate to an anti Higgs agenda? Come to think of it , it might well do. On the other hand it might be that I don't want us to chuck away a chance of promotion for the sake of a few quid to cover the court costs. But I guess some of you out there are happy about that. I ain't gunna post every thread where you are obviously anti Higgs, the threads are there for everyone to see. bullshit posts don't have to originate on here there are other sites where you can do your work. I did notice you started doing a count of the board members who were going to games then stopped..... Why? Also you said 4 months ago we will hear "any day now" about the mystical consortium, how long will "anyday now" last?
|
|
|
Post by peterpirate on Jan 13, 2016 20:20:19 GMT
Just heard peter north productions are after him now,gets a bonus everytime he shoots
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:34:11 GMT
I cant still be the only person Who thinks gasincider has an agenda against Higgs can I? The only reason these "stories" are in circulation is because gasincider is starting them. We have been told that the appeal is costing hardly anything. Yet more bullshit from gasincider. Remember he has been telling us that we will hear something "any day soon" about the consortium for 4 months now. Every thread he starts is a sh** stirring exercise with no facts. Don't believe me? Have a look back at his threads. So I'm part of MT's family living in Oxford and ran the thread on their forum did l? Oh, hang on, no I'm a Hearts fan......blah blah blah No as I said at the start, these are stories in circulation at the moment and they hadn't been posted on here. Sorry to keep the upset ones in the loop. Personally I think we can do better than Taylor, but the problem is wages. Tubbs is on a lot more than Taylor, and won't come here for what he is on. Where is my anti Higgs agenda in all this? If we hadn't p*ssed so much up against the courtroom walls we would be making a profit and have no need to sell anyone. So does telling it as it is equate to an anti Higgs agenda? Come to think of it , it might well do. On the other hand it might be that I don't want us to chuck away a chance of promotion for the sake of a few quid to cover the court costs. But I guess some of you out there are happy about that. So these stories are in circulation are they? Where is the story that Taylor will be sold to pay court costs? Other than the thread THAT YOU STARTED, show us this thread.
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Jan 13, 2016 20:39:28 GMT
So I'm part of MT's family living in Oxford and ran the thread on their forum did l? Oh, hang on, no I'm a Hearts fan......blah blah blah No as I said at the start, these are stories in circulation at the moment and they hadn't been posted on here. Sorry to keep the upset ones in the loop. Personally I think we can do better than Taylor, but the problem is wages. Tubbs is on a lot more than Taylor, and won't come here for what he is on. Where is my anti Higgs agenda in all this? If we hadn't p*ssed so much up against the courtroom walls we would be making a profit and have no need to sell anyone. So does telling it as it is equate to an anti Higgs agenda? Come to think of it , it might well do. On the other hand it might be that I don't want us to chuck away a chance of promotion for the sake of a few quid to cover the court costs. But I guess some of you out there are happy about that. So these stories are in circulation are they? Where is the story that Taylor will be sold to pay court costs? Other than the thread THAT YOU STARTED, show us this thread. gasheads.org/thread/4446/matty-tayloryellowsforum.co.uk/thread/22716/matty-taylorThese are the threads that have circulated the rumours, it's not just something gasincider has just invented
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Jan 13, 2016 20:40:04 GMT
Actually Hugo, that's why lower league teams are lower league. You don't have to sell to break even. Some teams like us have sold to break even, look at all of our big sales, all of them were players we bought. Other clubs are the opposite, get free-bies and move 'em on. I doubt many lower league teams break even. It's the other way round actually, lots of lower league clubs break even or make a small loss or profit but the higher up you go the bigger the loses. Basically if you want to buy and run a club on a tight ship then lower league is the best bet but if you've got millions or even billions then a Prem or championship club is the ideal play thing but it costs a fortune.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:44:38 GMT
Where did it say Taylor will be sold to pay court costs?
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Jan 13, 2016 20:47:37 GMT
Where did it say Taylor will be sold to pay court costs? Well it's obvious isn't it, they wouldn't sell Taylor for any other reason, when have rovers ever invested transfer money back into the club
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2016 20:58:17 GMT
Where did it say Taylor will be sold to pay court costs? Well it's obvious isn't it, they wouldn't sell Taylor for any other reason, when have rovers ever invested transfer money back into the club So that's a no then? You couldn't see where it was posted that Rovers were only going sell Taylor to pay court costs. It was "so obvious" you couldn't show us. Are you privy to BRFC accounts to say that they haven't ever invested transfer money back into the club? Wow you must be quite high up in the pecking order, or you couldn't have a clue...... Hhmmmmmm I wonder
|
|