|
Post by gheadray on Jan 17, 2016 23:26:22 GMT
Iam sure its not just Oxfords ground but when they build these all seater stadiums they seem to kill the home support , atmosphere wise . Today ok we had fantastic support but I couldn't help notice that behind the goal the stand was only 3/4 full of Oxford fans. Having visited their previous ground although we travelled in numbers Oxford would create an intimidating noise in the massed ranks in their end . Something to be said for building a ground or developing our own that keeps that 'end together' Maybe Iam biased but I thought we totally drowned the Oxford support for the full match UTG and Goodnight Irene !
|
|
|
Post by Congas on Jan 18, 2016 6:28:49 GMT
You can't say all new stadiums are like that. Oxford's is because it's wide open in the corners and only has three sides. It seems like they built what they could afford at the time with an eye on completing it some time in the future. It's a very drab affair that looks like it was thrown up in all haste from the first blueprint without any consideration taken to the acoustics (or much else for that matter apart from the car park). Stoke is another design that looks like it wasn't given much thought. A wrap-around in one corner but wide open in the other three, letting in icy winds and rain (part of their defensive tactics perhaps). Many of the new grounds have great accoustics. I don't get the nostagia for old grounds. The only ones worth mentioning were designed by Archibald Leitch www.google.se/search?q=Archibald+Leitch+football+grounds+pics&client=opera&hs=DM5&biw=1920&bih=970&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi04vX227LKAhWJ73IKHeOOA2IQsAQIGg#tbm=isch&q=Archibald+Leitch+, most others looked like they were flung up by local builders after a handshake in a pub.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2016 6:34:09 GMT
The capacity is no doubt beyond their LG2 needs. 2500 traveling fans in a crowd of 10k are always going to make a noise(should). Other all seater grounds don't have a problem. Not that they are particularly noisy but at Stamford bridge, you can count the number of fans sitting in the shed on one hand. From start to finish, they stand up in there.
|
|
|
Post by Feeling The Blues on Jan 18, 2016 8:59:45 GMT
You can't say all new stadiums are like that. Oxford's is because it's wide open in the corners and only has three sides. It seems like they built what they could afford at the time with an eye on completing it some time in the future. It's a very drab affair that looks like it was thrown up in all haste from the first blueprint without any consideration taken to the acoustics (or much else for that matter apart from the car park). Stoke is another design that looks like it wasn't given much thought. A wrap-around in one corner but wide open in the other three, letting in icy winds and rain (part of their defensive tactics perhaps). Many of the new grounds have great accoustics. I don't get the nostagia for old grounds. The only ones worth mentioning were designed by Archibald Leitch www.google.se/search?q=Archibald+Leitch+football+grounds+pics&client=opera&hs=DM5&biw=1920&bih=970&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi04vX227LKAhWJ73IKHeOOA2IQsAQIGg#tbm=isch&q=Archibald+Leitch+, most others looked like they were flung up by local builders after a handshake in a pub. The atmosphere at Stoke is amongst the best in the country so it goes to show its people that create atmosphere more than ground design.
|
|
|
Post by fanboy on Jan 18, 2016 9:06:28 GMT
If they are planning on putting up a 4th stand they're going to lose half the car park surely? Didn't seem to be much room by the pitch that side.
|
|
|
Post by spiess1 on Jan 18, 2016 9:07:24 GMT
Ah. Good old Cary Grant.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Jayho on Jan 18, 2016 9:09:39 GMT
You can't say all new stadiums are like that. Oxford's is because it's wide open in the corners and only has three sides. It seems like they built what they could afford at the time with an eye on completing it some time in the future. It's a very drab affair that looks like it was thrown up in all haste from the first blueprint without any consideration taken to the acoustics (or much else for that matter apart from the car park). Stoke is another design that looks like it wasn't given much thought. A wrap-around in one corner but wide open in the other three, letting in icy winds and rain (part of their defensive tactics perhaps). Many of the new grounds have great accoustics. I don't get the nostagia for old grounds. The only ones worth mentioning were designed by Archibald Leitch www.google.se/search?q=Archibald+Leitch+football+grounds+pics&client=opera&hs=DM5&biw=1920&bih=970&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi04vX227LKAhWJ73IKHeOOA2IQsAQIGg#tbm=isch&q=Archibald+Leitch+, most others looked like they were flung up by local builders after a handshake in a pub. I remember going to watch Rangers at Ibrox about 15 years ago and that stadium is terrific externally. The interior's nothing special of course but the outside of the Main Stand is bloody majestic and a great example of yer man Archibald's work.
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 18, 2016 9:41:47 GMT
There are plans to complete the corners at Stoke, but why they haven't done so yet is beyond me. It will be fantastic once it's done and the atmosphere even better.
|
|
|
Post by kentgas on Jan 18, 2016 10:35:01 GMT
I think Pompey's Fratton Park is another of Archibald Leitch's.
Look forward to seeing that again next month.
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jan 18, 2016 10:59:53 GMT
Love older grounds, been to the Kassam now and it's probably one of the more soulless grounds I've been too following Rovers. Don't get me wrong, the Mem is a dump but it's got something about it! I think younger fans like myself will genuinely miss it if/when we move on.
|
|
|
Post by knowall on Jan 18, 2016 11:04:17 GMT
Love older grounds, been to the Kassam now and it's probably one of the more soulless grounds I've been too following Rovers. Don't get me wrong, the Mem is a dump but it's got something about it! I think younger fans like myself will genuinely miss it if/when we move on. wait till you grow up - then you will realise - it really is a dump of the highest order
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2016 11:06:08 GMT
I think the 'new all-seater stadium' argument is a poor one from the clubs (not the OP I hasten to add).
Teams like Brighton manage it, and whilst Stoke isn't quite the same as the 'blueprint' all seaters, their atmosphere doesn't suffer.
|
|
|
Post by gheadray on Jan 18, 2016 11:28:56 GMT
I think the point Iam trying to make is at the Kassam stadium the seating behind the goal isn't very popular where as in older stadiums the atmosphere can be Intimintating as it was in their old ground The Memorial may have its faults but the Blackthorn end is a popular place to stand and can create this atmosphere
|
|
|
Post by phillistine on Jan 18, 2016 13:04:32 GMT
You can't say all new stadiums are like that. Oxford's is because it's wide open in the corners and only has three sides. It seems like they built what they could afford at the time with an eye on completing it some time in the future. It's a very drab affair that looks like it was thrown up in all haste from the first blueprint without any consideration taken to the acoustics (or much else for that matter apart from the car park). Stoke is another design that looks like it wasn't given much thought. A wrap-around in one corner but wide open in the other three, letting in icy winds and rain (part of their defensive tactics perhaps). Many of the new grounds have great accoustics. I don't get the nostagia for old grounds. The only ones worth mentioning were designed by Archibald Leitch www.google.se/search?q=Archibald+Leitch+football+grounds+pics&client=opera&hs=DM5&biw=1920&bih=970&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi04vX227LKAhWJ73IKHeOOA2IQsAQIGg#tbm=isch&q=Archibald+Leitch+, most others looked like they were flung up by local builders after a handshake in a pub. and whats wrong with that? Football grounds should be slung together by local builders after a handshake in a pub. Too many of these concrete monstrasities are built for the TV generation who are used to watching from the comfort of their own homes. Real grounds would attract real supporters During yesterday's match I had a guy behind me talking all the time about how wonderful the Premiership is. He was patronising about the standard of football he was watching and if it wasnt for the fact that I am very polite and mild mannered - i would have told him where to go
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jan 18, 2016 14:12:00 GMT
Nothing worse than the middle class, white collar type of football 'fans'. You know the ones, that support a big prem team that they have no real attachment too but see themselves as real football fans. The ones that mock proper football supporters. The ones who go to one game every 3 years and pay well over the odds to watch that match!
Those sorts of people are the worst!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2016 14:27:23 GMT
Nothing worse than the middle class, white collar type of football 'fans'. You know the ones, that support a big prem team that they have no real attachment too but see themselves as real football fans. The ones that mock proper football supporters. The ones who go to one game every 3 years and pay well over the odds to watch that match! Those sorts of people are the worst! I am white collar, probably middle class by my profession but I totally agree. It's not just AT the ground, where middle class dad stops you standing. He also doesn't like you swearing either. Even shouting loudly gets you branding you an "idiot". He turns up whe you win but is far away in a relegation dogfight. Away from the ground, the middle class are meddling as much as they can. Starting with promoting women's football well above the actual interest level (football can't be a male activity - hand wringing liberal women are aghast at an all male concept and speak about it frequently at their women only gyms and women's rights rallies. All must be included. The concept of a Wayne Rooney type man making millions is like bile to them - a working class scouser who makes £300k a week on merit alone? What about doctors, nurses, teachers etc? I.e jobs mainly done by them. Educated folk, not oiks like Rooney. Then it's non stop obsession with any kind of "ism" in the game - this WAS a working mans game littered with insult and abuse of all types, but it's the moral crusade of the middle class media to charge in on a White horse to save us from our wicked ways. Of course, we are saved through prosecution and public humiliation for disobeying imposed values by our betters..... In addition, the police, as we all know, are far more aggressive to groups of white, working class male football supporters than they were in to rioters. The hatred of the working class never went away, the baton is held by the liberal London based media. Utter contempt for the men who built and run this county.
|
|
|
Post by mehewmagic on Jan 18, 2016 14:35:33 GMT
Hope you've got insurance when riding that high horse :-)
|
|
|
Post by CrispPusher on Jan 18, 2016 14:40:04 GMT
Nothing worse than the middle class, white collar type of football 'fans'. You know the ones, that support a big prem team that they have no real attachment too but see themselves as real football fans. The ones that mock proper football supporters. The ones who go to one game every 3 years and pay well over the odds to watch that match! Those sorts of people are the worst! What's being middle class got to do with it? Plenty of working class people are like that as well.
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Jan 18, 2016 14:42:46 GMT
Nothing worse than the middle class, white collar type of football 'fans'. You know the ones, that support a big prem team that they have no real attachment too but see themselves as real football fans. The ones that mock proper football supporters. The ones who go to one game every 3 years and pay well over the odds to watch that match! Those sorts of people are the worst! What's being middle class got to do with it? Plenty of working class people are like that as well. Nothing really, it's just a stereotype but from my experience its normally middle class people. Dont get me wrong, there's many middle class people that follow their clubs religiously!
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Jan 18, 2016 20:14:19 GMT
Love older grounds, been to the Kassam now and it's probably one of the more soulless grounds I've been too following Rovers. Don't get me wrong, the Mem is a dump but it's got something about it! I think younger fans like myself will genuinely miss it if/when we move on. I'm in my late 30s so I remember Eastville and twerton and I like the Mem. It holds 12000 which is enough ( unless we got to premiere league) the pitch is great and the home fans atmosphere is better than any other ground in the lower leagues that I've been too bar Pompey and that's an old ground too.
|
|