|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Feb 18, 2016 17:25:40 GMT
Ok first posters on here may recognise that I dont take many threads or posts seriously. (Or that I'm a complete arsehole)
Up to this point I've seen the takeover threads as bullsh*t with little backing. However I've genuinely just been informed that the takeover is 100% true and will be announced tommorow. I'm not going to reveal my source as they work with Rovers and wouldn't want them to get into any trouble/lose their position. I'm not sure who it is, whether it's Yanks, Jordanions a consortium or a rich bloke but it is 100% happening and I'm pretty sure we'll know more or everything at some point tommorow.
Exciting times!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 17:27:30 GMT
Cant this be merged mods?
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Feb 18, 2016 17:28:31 GMT
I've also been told about the new consortium, and so has my wife.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 17:40:36 GMT
I've also been told about the new consortium, and so has my wife. In my day, they used to call a consortium an orgy. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Ali on Feb 18, 2016 17:45:53 GMT
I've also been told about the new consortium, and so has my wife. In my day, they used to call a consortium an orgy. Consorgy. I've got a load of butter. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 17:55:00 GMT
In my day, they used to call a consortium an orgy. Consorgy. I've got a load of butter. Butter? That's gert posh that is. I'm usually a swarfega man myself. |
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Feb 18, 2016 18:31:07 GMT
If true there is supposed to be a confidentiality clause in place, looks like it's working well as loads seem to know now. But no one can reveal there source. If they are allowed to talk about it and are telling people, why not reveal them?? If they were bothered about people finding out, they wouldn't tell in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Feb 18, 2016 19:59:49 GMT
If true there is supposed to be a confidentiality clause in place, looks like it's working well as loads seem to know now. But no one can reveal there source. If they are allowed to talk about it and are telling people, why not reveal them?? If they were bothered about people finding out, they wouldn't tell in the first place. Well when people could potentially lose their jobs/source of income/livelihood over it you could understand. Do you want the name and address of the person who told me this or something? |
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Feb 18, 2016 20:02:31 GMT
If true there is supposed to be a confidentiality clause in place, looks like it's working well as loads seem to know now. But no one can reveal there source. If they are allowed to talk about it and are telling people, why not reveal them?? If they were bothered about people finding out, they wouldn't tell in the first place. Well when people could potentially lose their jobs/source of income/livelihood over it you could understand. Do you want the name and address of the person who told me this or something? That's my point! Why would they risk that to tell lots of other people! They managed to keep the whole Uwe and Sainsburys projects secret for years, but now they leak information?? Yet nothing they have so say leaked, has been true yet. If it was that big a secret, they wouldn't have told you. |
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Feb 18, 2016 20:07:07 GMT
Well when people could potentially lose their jobs/source of income/livelihood over it you could understand. Do you want the name and address of the person who told me this or something? That's my point! Why would they risk that to tell lots of other people! They managed to keep the whole Uwe and Sainsburys projects secret for years, but now they leak information?? Yet nothing they have so say leaked, has been true yet. If it was that big a secret, they wouldn't have told you. I've been told by a close friend who only found out yesterday. This person works closely with Rovers so I trust it entirely. Information has leaked from people in the same way, none of these sources people are getting information from have been shouting it from the rooftops. |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Feb 18, 2016 20:30:01 GMT
I really really hope something happens tomorrow but as this is Rovers I won't hold my breath.
|
|
|
|
Post by northsidegas on Feb 18, 2016 20:56:33 GMT
the press would know about this if it was true surely??
|
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Feb 18, 2016 21:02:52 GMT
Ok first posters on here may recognise that I dont take many threads or posts seriously. (Or that I'm a complete arsehole) Up to this point I've seen the takeover threads as bullsh*t with little backing. However I've genuinely just been informed that the takeover is 100% true and will be announced tommorow. I'm not going to reveal my source as they work with Rovers and wouldn't want them to get into any trouble/lose their position. I'm not sure who it is, whether it's Yanks, Jordanions a consortium or a rich bloke but it is 100% happening and I'm pretty sure we'll know more or everything at some point tommorow. Exciting times! Taken over by the administrators ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 21:04:43 GMT
Not another thread...  |
|
|
|
Post by Dr Gas on Feb 18, 2016 21:07:24 GMT
the press would know about this if it was true surely?? Who is saying they do not? |
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on Feb 18, 2016 21:09:07 GMT
I was in the garden just now wondering if I would catch sight of the ISS when I saw what
can only be described as a fleet of rectangular objects,each about 12ft x 6 ft with tassles
at each corner, travelling from the east. Each had one person seated in the middle and I
could just make out a single trailing banner with ' THE RETURN OF THE BLACK ARABS' inscribed
upon it. Seemed pretty strange to me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 21:20:45 GMT
If true there is supposed to be a confidentiality clause in place, looks like it's working well as loads seem to know now. But no one can reveal there source. If they are allowed to talk about it and are telling people, why not reveal them?? If they were bothered about people finding out, they wouldn't tell in the first place. Well when people could potentially lose their jobs/source of income/livelihood over it you could understand. Do you want the name and address of the person who told me this or something? More of a reason to keep their mouths shut I would have thought. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 21:35:49 GMT
Where's the new beginning thread gone?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 21:37:03 GMT
Where's the new beginning thread gone? bottom of page 2 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 21:38:01 GMT
Where's the new beginning thread gone? bottom of page 2 Well fecking bring it back up I miss it! |
|
