|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 2, 2016 21:44:00 GMT
The present design allows for a second tier taking capacity to about 26,000. It also is capable of having the roof raised to fit in more seating with capacity reaching 35,000. I would have thought that's more than enough for the foreseeable future. From the plans (and the same designers?) I got the impression that the UWE plans are the same as MK Dons lower tier and any increase would be the same as their 2nd tier...? Looks nice but not sure why the roof is so high... EDIT: Their bottom tier is 22,000, which would make that part the same size as UWE. The reason for the high roof is for a 3rd tier to take the capacity to 45,000. Yeah, and the UWE will have a high-looking roof to fit the second tier in. The UWE is so similar to the MKBowl that the artist's impression is virtually lifted straight from a photo of that stadium:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2016 23:21:21 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting:
1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total).
2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK.
|
|
|
Post by Gastroenteritis on Mar 2, 2016 23:44:06 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. i definitely smell a sh** head.
|
|
|
Post by gheadray on Mar 2, 2016 23:44:55 GMT
We are not building a Wembley stadium
|
|
|
Post by Gastroenteritis on Mar 2, 2016 23:47:50 GMT
It might be worth reading gasinsiders comments on the UWE stadium thread, he said he spoke to Wael. Maybe we should keep our feet on the ground for now at there seems to be some unresolved issues. I think we can all agree gasinsider has some credibility now.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 3, 2016 8:31:49 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. I guess they've just moved on to different roles which don;t require them to be authoirsed, unless you've evidence they've been caught doing something they shouldn't have been doing and so been struck off?
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 3, 2016 8:38:06 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. I guess they've just moved on to different roles which don;t require them to be authoirsed, unless you've evidence they've been caught doing something they shouldn't have been doing and so been struck off? Yeah, it's just a register. Bit of a red herring, and a strange thing to post, imo.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Jayho on Mar 3, 2016 10:22:38 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. Rovers aren't our rivals but we spend our spare time trawling through the financial services register in a desperate attempt to try and discredit them. Embarrassing really.
|
|
|
Post by simon1883 on Mar 3, 2016 10:46:30 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. fishing Shee'd
|
|
|
Post by Okebournegas on Mar 3, 2016 10:56:04 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK. Utter, utter, dross I think bottoms may be starting to twitch and the phrase grasping at straws comes to mind !!!!!
|
|
|
Post by knowall on Mar 3, 2016 10:56:10 GMT
At last - people in for their expertice - not because they put £100,000 in to be a Director - the way a company should be run
|
|
|
Post by mayfairgas on Mar 3, 2016 11:06:13 GMT
I'm sure these appointments are good news for the club, but a couple of facts worth noting: 1. Wembley finished £300m over budget (to put into context, the Emirates stadium cost £400m in total). 2. According to the Financial Services register, both Lee Atkins and Hamilton Lunn are no longer authorised to conduct financial advice in the UK.
The first point hopefully means he's learnt some lessons and our build will be much smoother
The second point as has been pointed out already is irrelevant. Being inactive on the FCA register has little relevance to their ability to perform the roles they have now, likely means the roles they will be performing for us are not controlled functions.
|
|
|
Post by aforce on Jun 25, 2018 20:45:40 GMT
Where’s Michael cunnah?
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,764
|
Post by pirate on Jun 25, 2018 20:49:29 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2018 21:00:14 GMT
Interesting that they left a full six months before the UWE collapse was made public. Did they know something?
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,764
|
Post by pirate on Jun 25, 2018 21:15:06 GMT
Interesting that they left a full six months before the UWE collapse was made public. Did they know something? It does make you wonder.
|
|
|
Post by aforce on Jun 25, 2018 21:48:04 GMT
Interesting that they left a full six months before the UWE collapse was made public. Did they know something? It does make you wonder. Seems they left via the back door, something definitely doesn’t sit right with this whole scenario
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Jun 25, 2018 22:44:09 GMT
And the new CEO has not even started yet.
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jun 25, 2018 22:50:52 GMT
They left as it was said we were not happy how the negotiations were going. Obviously they still didn't go to plan. The new chief executive worked on planning plymouths new stand and facilities. Plus I think Tom Gorringe used to work for a stadium company. So think we are still planning on doing something, what that is, I don't have a clue though LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Wembley_Gas on Jun 26, 2018 1:14:26 GMT
It's an alternative plot to the old field of dreams movie..."if you won't build it, they will go"
|
|