|
Post by gretschgas on Mar 17, 2016 8:54:37 GMT
Amazing how things change so quickly in football both on and off the pitch. Without the extraordinary takeover a few weeks ago we'd all be glued to this and the 0.1% chance we have of winning.
What a luxury to just shrug off the inevitable defeat here and, if anything, be glad that the whole debacle is over.
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Mar 17, 2016 8:59:35 GMT
Hoping against hope that we get a result, but if not time to draw a line under this and move on.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Mar 17, 2016 9:16:28 GMT
What would be nice if we fail, is the judges to slam Shamesbury for their poor business ethics
|
|
|
Post by lympstonegas on Mar 17, 2016 9:23:20 GMT
What would be nice if we fail, is the judges to slam Shamesbury for their poor business ethics I'm hoping for this either way - whether we win or lose - the national headlines today is that Sainsburys name ethics and values is shamed for all to see
|
|
|
Post by phillistine on Mar 17, 2016 9:27:20 GMT
Let's be real guys - the result matters as it means that we will need to raise less money on finance. The new owners have said that the stadium will definitely go ahead - which is not the same as today's result doesn't matter
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Mar 17, 2016 9:28:31 GMT
What would be nice if we fail, is the judges to slam Shamesbury for their poor business ethics True, but they'll just spin it. After the last ruling Justice Proudman slated Sainsbury's for acting in bad faith but she ruled that the letter of the contract took precedent. But it was buried in the judgment so Sainsbury's just came straight out with their press release 'we always acted in good faith.' Which was bollocks but who's going to wade through a 20 page judgment? (apart from us)
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Mar 17, 2016 9:45:59 GMT
What would be nice if we fail, is the judges to slam Shamesbury for their poor business ethics True, but they'll just spin it. After the last ruling Justice Proudman slated Sainsbury's for acting in bad faith but she ruled that the letter of the contract took precedent. But it was buried in the judgment so Sainsbury's just came straight out with their press release 'we always acted in good faith.' Which was bollocks but who's going to wade through a 20 page judgment? (apart from us) The thing is apart from our side of Bristol who actually gives a stuff if we get screwed over.
|
|