Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2017 0:57:27 GMT
Saw matty in sainsburys emersons green.
He's dead to me.
|
|
|
Post by Dr Gas on Jan 25, 2017 1:36:10 GMT
I would expect a bid from Brentford who will have cash to burn if the get £15m they are asking for Hogan...hopeful DC has some targets just in case. West Ham are reported to be in for Hogan but will not meet the asking price. It seems that they are testing Brentford's resolution but if they hang it out (as SuGo usually do) then it would not leave much time for Brentford to sign anyone and for the selling team to replace their striker.
|
|
|
Post by Dr Gas on Jan 25, 2017 1:44:01 GMT
The only hope we got to get a better price is if there's a bidding war between clubs. Wouldn't make a difference if there was a clause. They could all bid £300,000, then it would be up to him. They wouldn't need to bid more to us. True in some respects but clubs would look at the overall cost: For instance, if they could get him for a signing on fee of £x, compared to wages of £y over, say 3 seasons, which could result in a long winded to and fro situation between interested clubs, it might be better to bite the bullet and offer more as a transfer fee, which would mean that Rovers would let him speak with the highest bidder.
|
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,129
|
Post by Marshy on Jan 25, 2017 7:38:43 GMT
Saw matty in sainsburys emersons green. He's dead to me. What were you doing in Sainsbury's Boldersgas? Your dead to me now.
|
|
|
Post by nailseagas on Jan 25, 2017 8:09:30 GMT
Matty will not be going to any of the teams linked with him, Why? because none of them have a cup big enough for him to keep his c*ck in,
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 25, 2017 8:27:53 GMT
Wouldn't make a difference if there was a clause. They could all bid £300,000, then it would be up to him. They wouldn't need to bid more to us. True in some respects but clubs would look at the overall cost: For instance, if they could get him for a signing on fee of £x, compared to wages of £y over, say 3 seasons, which could result in a long winded to and fro situation between interested clubs, it might be better to bite the bullet and offer more as a transfer fee, which would mean that Rovers would let him speak with the highest bidder. We'd have to let him speak to anybody how meets the buy out clause?
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jan 25, 2017 8:33:52 GMT
Easy way out of the £300,000 level.
Hold out until 5 minutes before deadline closes then accept all the bids - big bids come in and Matty can go do one in the Championship
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2017 8:43:04 GMT
Saw matty in sainsburys emersons green. He's dead to me. What were you doing in Sainsbury's Boldersgas? Your dead to me now. Farting on the ham of course.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jan 25, 2017 8:47:15 GMT
What were you doing in Sainsbury's Boldersgas? Your dead to me now. Farting on the ham of course. So you have stopped "jerking" over the chicken then ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2017 8:53:17 GMT
Farting on the ham of course. So you have stopped "jerking" over the chicken then ? To spicy on my eye.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2017 9:24:05 GMT
I hear many people saying they isn't anyone decent available in January, yet Matty may well be available for £300k.
Would fans expect Rovers to go for players of his calibre for £300k? I'm sure there are shedloads of players with this kind of clause, although you have to question their commitment to have one in the first place imo.
|
|
|
Post by Jon the Stripe on Jan 25, 2017 9:41:22 GMT
I hear many people saying they isn't anyone decent available in January, yet Matty may well be available for £300k. Would fans expect Rovers to go for players of his calibre for £300k? I'm sure there are shedloads of players with this kind of clause, although you have to question their commitment to have one in the first place imo. In fairness it's not about commitment, it's about securing a financial future/security for your family which is becoming increasingly tough these days.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2017 10:06:34 GMT
I hear many people saying they isn't anyone decent available in January, yet Matty may well be available for £300k. Would fans expect Rovers to go for players of his calibre for £300k? I'm sure there are shedloads of players with this kind of clause, although you have to question their commitment to have one in the first place imo. In fairness it's not about commitment, it's about securing a financial future/security for your family which is becoming increasingly tough these days.
That's one way to look at it, but then the contract itself should be security enough without a release clause?
I would always question a player signing a tidy contract already thinking about their next move, than again I am a suspicious barsteward.
I'm sure agents play their part as well to some extent.
|
|
|
Post by Gas_Quarters on Jan 25, 2017 10:12:48 GMT
I'm surprised Barnsley aren't one of the teams linked with him (unless if they are and I just haven't seen it). They have recently lost their top scorer, Sam Winnall, to Sheff Wed and they are apparently close to selling two players to Villa for a combined fee of £6m. That's exactly the sort of side I'd expect to be in the hunt considering they are also going pretty well in the Championship.
If I were to read that, I'd probably believe it.
|
|
|
Post by waelsdinosaur on Jan 25, 2017 10:45:52 GMT
Wouldn't be here if he was that cheap,with the amount of clubs who've been rumoured with him he would've gone,probably off to China
|
|
|
Post by Dr Gas on Jan 25, 2017 12:14:09 GMT
True in some respects but clubs would look at the overall cost: For instance, if they could get him for a signing on fee of £x, compared to wages of £y over, say 3 seasons, which could result in a long winded to and fro situation between interested clubs, it might be better to bite the bullet and offer more as a transfer fee, which would mean that Rovers would let him speak with the highest bidder. We'd have to let him speak to anybody how meets the buy out clause? The report alleges a clause, it does not state a buy out clause. A buy out clause would effectively mean that the player can pay his club an amount and no longer have a contract. I was referring to a release clause whereby the minimum amount that the club would accept is £x. If only the minimum amount is met then yes the club would need to let the player speak to the other team(s). However, if the offer was above that then the club would be entitled to do the best business for themselves.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 25, 2017 13:32:23 GMT
Was Everton's youngest ever scorer or even player at 16 or 17. Younger than Rooney I think. Close he was the second youngest beaten by Jose Baxter, but you are right he was younger than Rooney by 27 days But he was their youngest scorer, I think.
|
|
|
Post by countygroundhotel on Jan 25, 2017 13:42:09 GMT
We'd have to let him speak to anybody how meets the buy out clause? The report alleges a clause, it does not state a buy out clause. A buy out clause would effectively mean that the player can pay his club an amount and no longer have a contract. I was referring to a release clause whereby the minimum amount that the club would accept is £x. If only the minimum amount is met then yes the club would need to let the player speak to the other team(s). However, if the offer was above that then the club would be entitled to do the best business for themselves. If the player agrees a contract with the highest bidder. In effect anything we get will be less to Matty Taylor (& his agent). They might be offered a better deal by s lower bidder.
|
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,129
|
Post by Marshy on Jan 25, 2017 13:59:23 GMT
If Matty does go in this transfer window (I really hope he doesn't) We will be none the wiser as to what the transfer fee was as they will announce it as undisclosed! So all this speculation of somewhere between 300k & 10 million won't matter anyway so what's the Dam point!
|
|
|
Post by oddsongas on Jan 25, 2017 15:32:05 GMT
I haven't read this thread, but from my understanding, other clubs aren't meant to know the buyout clause. So they can't just offer the minimum and that's that. They give an offer, if it's above the buy out clause, we have to accept. If it's below we can decline. I've always thought that was the case. If I'm wrong I apologise
|
|