|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 15, 2022 9:35:39 GMT
My money is 100% on Cummings a bitter,twisted excuse of a man These p1ss ups had to have been widely known about, there's no way on earth the police, journalists, families of those attending etc weren't aware of the extent and frequency of the breaches. The information is just being strategically drip fed now as during a hardcore lockdown it would have been pure chaos. Should any further restrictions be necessary now there will be almost blanket disobedience all thanks to the tories disregard for any of us. They're a *ing disgrace as are our media and those corrupt in the police force. In other times we'd be taking to the streets to overthrow this shambles but we're too privileged, bigoted and self entitled to care enough. Still, could be worse, could have been Corbyn yeah? You are absolutely right. A government that does what they want and have the police and media in their pocket. On top of which, regarding your point about taking to the streets, I think you'll find that next week the government is going to take away your right to protest too. A dictatorship in the making and cheered on by many on the basis that they don't like the leader of the opposition. Pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 15, 2022 1:00:55 GMT
Starmer has done something wrong. He had a social gathering of food and beer at a time when socialising in doors was prohibited . Or is just a case of because it's Starmer it's all OK. Surely you can understand that. Can you show me the government guidelines please at the time of his party? Yatton has shown that he did nothing wrong.. If he is shown to have broken lockdown laws then yes potentially he should resign. But I don’t see anything to say he has, unless you’d like to show us? No surprise the right wing tabloids are desperately trying to save Boris all of a sudden Especially the Sun whos chief editor was... you guessed it.. at the party. I cant stand all this what about Starmer tripe tbh. He's not the PM and he didn't make the rules. If you can't see the difference there's no hope for you. Mind you, if you can still support this arrogant buffoon then that says a lot on its own.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 14, 2022 18:28:42 GMT
No it’s not . It’s two people socially distanced in a room . Pathetic attempt at trying to say it’s hypocrisy. 🙄 It's more than two people. Read the article and watch the video. Its beer and food that constitutes a party and you know it. It was also taken on a date where we weren't in lockdown wasn't it or did you check the date? Regardless, I'd like to hear what you think about 'operation save big dog' - I'm actually embarrassed for you lot.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 14, 2022 1:09:36 GMT
The beauty of it is that whichever way the inquiry goes, its going to look horrendous for him. If it confirms what we know, then bad for him, if they try to excuse it, bad for him. Everyone knows the truth, it's like watching a maggot on a hook. Absolute Dam poetry. The story has moved on after the Telegraph article anyway I suspect and yes, things will be bad for him either way. Maybe it's just him wanting to be exonerated officially before he leaves. Andrew Bridgen confirmed on Newsnight he's written his letter to the 1922 Committee. Many see him as a barometer of backbench opinion. Rumours in the press Rishi Sunak will announce energy price reductions shortly, must be an election happening soon. What I'm not quite getting is why so many of the Cabinet are being so open in their support, Sunak aside. Probably because they were there too I imagine. It serves them to try and get him off the hook and know its over for them anyway if they can't.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 14, 2022 0:25:49 GMT
The beauty of it is that whichever way the inquiry goes, its going to look horrendous for him. If it confirms what we know, then bad for him, if they try to excuse it, bad for him. Everyone knows the truth, it's like watching a maggot on a hook. Absolute Dam poetry.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 13, 2022 10:30:59 GMT
Sort of think that having Boris in situ is much better for Labour than a brand new shiny PM who has learnt from the current debacle I agree, but for the sake of the country we can't have him 'in charge' for another 2 years. Those on air today are embarrassing themselves, the Conservative Party and Parliament. It's so funny it's becoming a parody and actually offensive. Delicious isn't it. Its everything I thought it would be.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 11, 2022 23:05:36 GMT
Blairs a war criminal. I think we are pretty unanimously agreed on that here from previous discussions. Heck, even Stu got off the fence for that one I think!
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 11, 2022 19:38:58 GMT
British public love having their bellies tickled by upper class water takers. They will vote for more more MORE!
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Jan 1, 2022 20:19:11 GMT
Happy new year all! Any new year resolutions or goals set? Retire.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 29, 2021 18:43:45 GMT
No LFT’s and no PCR tests unless you’re really lucky . This should help the covid numbers reduce 😂 Go Boris 🇬🇧 ! Suspect they are going for it. With Omicron confirmed in vast majority of community transmission and some good evidence its milder (with vaccines on board), let it go free. My advice, dont get sick for 6 months. Field hospitals for months.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 28, 2021 14:42:18 GMT
My only regret is that I didn't get to Dr Quinn; Medicine Woman.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 28, 2021 12:20:47 GMT
Fair enough. One of their jobs should surely be to protect the platform though because as I say proboards will just shut this place down without a second thought. So regardless of their deliberation about whether allowing our platform to be used to potentially put people at risk or not is appropriate (hard decision that), there's surely good reason to act anyway. He doesn't need to be banned, he needs to stop posting sh**e and ruining the discussion for the rest of us. I raised this and posted a thread from Proboards support forum to the other mods where the creator of Proboards said in no uncertain terms that he would not tolerate any COVID misinformation on his platform. There was even a link on there where you could report forums/threads/posters that were guilty of this and a link to what Proboards considers trusted sources. With that in mind, I felt extremely uncomfortable with some of the nonsense being sprouted. Especially with the post that Hugo raised to us mods of Topper falling for the efficacy of masks that Pirate had posted. It’s a shame on two fronts really because I enjoy reading Pirates football related posts and I think that Hugo was an excellent moderator. So to lose them both over this is a bit of a blow, but we’ve come to right decision RE pirate eventually and I’m sure Hugo still has lots to contribute to this place as a poster. I'm glad you have acted now and I think that it is the right decision for all users (even if just to keep the platform from being shut down). I dont want to appear sanctimonious but maybe for reflection consider some interim actions whilst you discuss and decide. He has been posting like this on and off for well over a year. You may know something about him (as I do) which makes you more lenient towards his behaviour but please bear in mind that the vast majority of readers will not. This makes them more likely to believe it (eg Topper) but worse still, the inaction of the moderators gives validity to the information. It will be seen by other readers either consciously or unconsciously as if his posts are "evidence" as valid as any other, which they are not. No offence, but us on this thread have done an awful lot more to moderate and combat covid misinformation on this forum than the mod team saw fit to do for an entire year. I might just suggest that maybe that warrants a review. I'll just add that losing Hugo as a moderator is vastly more damaging to this forum than losing someone who posts covid misinformation. You'd have done well perhaps to have better recognised how long Hugo had been mod and the respect he has here with all users. He's usually very balanced and correct. All the best.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 28, 2021 11:00:50 GMT
Fair enough. One of their jobs should surely be to protect the platform though because as I say proboards will just shut this place down without a second thought. So regardless of their deliberation about whether allowing our platform to be used to potentially put people at risk or not is appropriate (hard decision that), there's surely good reason to act anyway. He doesn't need to be banned, he needs to stop posting sh**e and ruining the discussion for the rest of us. Those of Us who post on this section know he spouts absolute dangerous rubbish but it’s those that just read and don’t comment that concern me . If he influences just one person not to take the vaccine it could have consequences. Personally I’m amazed he’s been allowed to churn out his nonsense for so long . Roverdrive would have had none of this nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 28, 2021 10:53:38 GMT
Looks like they have made their decision and also looks like you may have been forced to make one of your own (as a result?). If so, credit to you. Allowing the spread of covid misinformation is a shame on them in my opinion. Fairly sure proboards will take a different opinion when it hits them. support.proboards.com/thread/661355/covid-19-global-health-emergencyI fully endorse the Moderation team to do what they feel is correct. I deliberately stayed out of the discussion in order for the others to make a decision. This has been the standard we set for ourselves a long time ago to avoid us having to moderate a dispute we are too close to. The team have made their decision and have taken what action they felt necessary, as have I. Fair enough. One of their jobs should surely be to protect the platform though because as I say proboards will just shut this place down without a second thought. So regardless of their deliberation about whether allowing our platform to be used to potentially put people at risk or not is appropriate (hard decision that), there's surely good reason to act anyway. He doesn't need to be banned, he needs to stop posting sh**e and ruining the discussion for the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 28, 2021 10:22:09 GMT
My only suggestion would be to ignore what he posts when it's opinion and report anything that is obviously misleading or dangerous to the Mod team. Looks like they have made their decision and also looks like you may have been forced to make one of your own (as a result?). If so, credit to you. Allowing the spread of covid misinformation is a shame on them in my opinion. Fairly sure proboards will take a different opinion when it hits them. support.proboards.com/thread/661355/covid-19-global-health-emergency
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 27, 2021 20:12:45 GMT
I don't know, but I have seen have the recent University of Oxford study that showed heart inflammation risk was higher from the Moderna mRNA injection than COVID-19 for those aged under 40. I'd rather not take that risk. Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark also previously suspended their use of the Moderna mRNA injection for certain age demographics because of concerns about side effects. As for other vaccines, adults under 40 here were to be offered alternative vaccines to the (non mRNA) AstraZeneca-Oxford one over blood clot concerns and several other countries have banned it altogether. Dr. Robert Malone, one of the inventors of the mRNA Technology, has said - "This novel technology has not been adequately tested. We need at least 5 years of testing and research before we can really understand the risks associated with this new technology. The harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later." To quote the Bayer President of Pharmaceuticals, Stefan Oelrich: “….The mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. If we had surveyed 2 years ago in the public 'would you be willing to take a gene/cell therapy and inject It into your body?’, we would have had a 95% refusal rate.” "but I have seen have the recent University of Oxford study that showed heart inflammation risk was higher from the Moderna mRNA injection than COVID-19 for those aged under 40. So, we are nearly a year in. How many cases of inflammation of the heart due to Moderna or Pfizer were quoted in that study? Given that actual number how is that expressed as a % of actual vaccinations? Deaths from that vaccine (MHRA) = 0.0002% and with no confirmed causal link. Until the National Union of Hairdressers releases their data IN FULL we may never know the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 27, 2021 15:46:06 GMT
Couldn't help myself but have a peek. Thought you guys would love this. Re pirates last post Dr Roger malone - his twitter feed says 'I literally created mRNA vaccines when I was 28'. Hes now 61.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 25, 2021 19:59:59 GMT
Especially when they use backing tracks. Never mind their social care policy, health policy, education policy, human rights policy, or any other policy for that matter. Never mind the tirade of actual, provable lies they feed us. Never mind Bernard Castle, HS2, breaking lockdown, oven ready deals and all that. The REAL phoneys are the ones that use backing tracks. Totally agree. I would'nt say "nevermind" to that list,but you can bet your last quid the Conservatives will have their own lists/cards to play against Labour,with an ace or two amongst them. Unless they can somehow prove that it was Labour in government all along for the last decade, I think I'll go with the actual track record when casting my vote. Pun intended.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 25, 2021 19:24:15 GMT
I agree, the British public are generally predictable in that they would almost certainly care more about a backing track than the governmental policy disasters of the last 14 years. I'm not being sarcastic, I actually agree with you. But, that's why we are where we are. I dislike the backing track.What next,when out canvassing will Sir Kier only speak to the public once one of his team have turned on the 'music machine and suited backing track' and got the lighting right,for full on pathos effect.Phoney. Whatever fine mess this Government may of got us in,I don't think those that vote Left or Right are ready to go to,or go back to,the Left. Yet.At least not enough of them. Especially when they use backing tracks. Never mind their social care policy, health policy, education policy, human rights policy, or any other policy for that matter. Never mind the tirade of actual, provable lies they feed us. Never mind Bernard Castle, HS2, breaking lockdown, oven ready deals and all that. The REAL phoneys are the ones that use backing tracks. Totally agree.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 25, 2021 18:29:44 GMT
In my opinion Boris Johnson will survive 2022. His team will be working on his public image. He's good at elections and Labour are still too divided.Having the Labour leader speak accompanied by a backing track, won't improve his image in the UK,USA maybe,but not here. I agree, the British public are generally predictable in that they would almost certainly care more about a backing track than the governmental policy disasters of the last 14 years. I'm not being sarcastic, I actually agree with you. But, that's why we are where we are.
|
|